Yes, boomers are past their peak spending years. Its another factor effecting the economy in the western countries.
The spending power of the boomers is palpable. That is for sure. What we see is a widening gap in products being offered too. There's higher end, and more expensive items for the more affluent boomers, and more economic choices for the Millennial crowd. Auto manufacturers have embraced that, and I am saving my nickels for the latest Bentley...
Best Buy have been very aggressive with their online fulfillment capability to boost their internet business. Their online sales of a few categories are now more margin than their store inventory product sales in several jurisdictions.
I'm sure they have. As Yoda says, "Do, or do not. There is no try."
Would not say the letting FS go was caused by bad management as much as it was adjusting to the shifting competitive pressures. Second factor is that they would likely shut down FS and focus on their main retail brand Best Buy than shut down locations of both chains.
On this I have to respectfully disagree. Dropping the FShop banner was not "caused" by mis-management, it was a reaction to the situation. Of course it is an adjustment in regards to the shifting competitive pressures, but that sort of obfuscates the reality of how the competition has been winning. If your competitor has been taking market share (when you drop your outlet count by 25% in two years there has to be component of that happening when the market demand has not dropped nearly as much), then you are losing. That's the bottom line.
When a company grows, people on top love to take credit even if the growth is just reflective of the demand growth. When it falls, the focus becomes everything
but the guys (or gals) at the helm (at least that's what they will tell you). Canadian Tire didn't stay in Automotive products and services. They evolved with the market. So has places like Superstore. Blockbuster didn't... and where are they now?
The second factor doesn't mitigate the cause, it only describes a course of action. In the end Corporation "A" owns and operates Chain "X" and Chain "Y". The shareholders and the bank look at the bottom line of Corporation "A". How a company achieves a reduction in costs OPEX/CAPEX to stay solvent does not explain away how they got into the predicament in the first place.
Too bad, the FS folks worked hard over the years to build that store brand in Canada. Lot of jobs lost.
Yes. It's always a drag to see hard workers pay the price. Hopefully their skills are transferable to another market. As bad as it seems, this is still conservative Canada, so we do try to take care of each other.