Full Service and your SP
- Thread starter Mr.
- Start date
The results of HIV testing are not a 100% guarantee of being clean even without that occuring.
No safe sex measure is a 100% guarantee of safety, including condoms.
HIV testing (with negative results), though, like condoms, provides a high degree of likelihood you won't catch HIV during sex.
This is especially the case if you use both the antibody and antigen HIV tests, which are covered by BC healthcare.
Last edited:
use a dental dam (latex) or plastic wrap
was in Hawaii on holiday once and found this to be quite common, perhaps because of the range of foreign visitors.... who knows
declined so could not comment as to level of enjoyment
was in Hawaii on holiday once and found this to be quite common, perhaps because of the range of foreign visitors.... who knows
declined so could not comment as to level of enjoyment
L
LADY-VIA
you are not the only one whos had their eye on her..just dont be cheap and go see a girl like miss mariposa above here^ I mean do you think she doesn't get tested? Suffice to say that if you think you are scared , the SP is probably also. Just wrap it up, thats what condoms are for
BTW missy I have to come see ya soon, i've had my eye on you
serious girl crush maybe you can sneak me in too !!!as for you Mr... just do what you are comfortable with.. we all have our own limits.... stay protected--- relax and enjoy the ride
i just want to say that mandatory sti checks are against our human rights and single sex workers out as the vector of disease. where does the sp get the disease? from the pooner....who got it from his wife....who got it from the milkman....
those of us working towards decrim in canada are completely opposed to mandatory health checks, it didn't work in 1901 and it won't work now.
the only way mandatory health checks will have any impact on public health and safety is if everyone in the entire population are tested. then we could single out and isolate those who are infected for treatment....doesn't sound very good does it? that's because its not. it violates our right to privacy and choice over our bodies.
the same goes for licensing single or indy workers or employees in a massage parlour. never. we do npot support that.
ask yourself, should an employee of a restaurant let's say have to have a license to work in the restaurant? or how about in a bank? do you need a license for that?
yes, massage parlours and agnecies will need to be licensed as are all businesses inside the city of vancouver but workers will not, whether indy or working for a business.
love susie
those of us working towards decrim in canada are completely opposed to mandatory health checks, it didn't work in 1901 and it won't work now.
the only way mandatory health checks will have any impact on public health and safety is if everyone in the entire population are tested. then we could single out and isolate those who are infected for treatment....doesn't sound very good does it? that's because its not. it violates our right to privacy and choice over our bodies.
the same goes for licensing single or indy workers or employees in a massage parlour. never. we do npot support that.
ask yourself, should an employee of a restaurant let's say have to have a license to work in the restaurant? or how about in a bank? do you need a license for that?
yes, massage parlours and agnecies will need to be licensed as are all businesses inside the city of vancouver but workers will not, whether indy or working for a business.
love susie
