Fetish Friendly
- Thread starter Cuntree
- Start date
- Status
There is a fetish for everything. Human sexual deviancy is extensive. The Fetish realm is not standardized, that’s the beauty of it IMO.
It’s not like asking what does GFE include...but even in the case of GFE it’s up to the provider to customize her services the way she feels fit.
It’s not like asking what does GFE include...but even in the case of GFE it’s up to the provider to customize her services the way she feels fit.
Using the term "fetish friendly" in an ad generally means the SP is open to accommodating certain fetishes. It's up to the prospective client to ask her if she accommodates his specific fetish.
And if anyone who advertises as "fetish friendly" responds by saying they're into "anything and everything" they're either full of shit, insane or naive. There's plenty of paraphilias that are very dangerous and or/illegal.
And if anyone who advertises as "fetish friendly" responds by saying they're into "anything and everything" they're either full of shit, insane or naive. There's plenty of paraphilias that are very dangerous and or/illegal.
So if I text the SP and ask if she can accomodate me with DFK and she tells me that is a question for behind closed doors .....what am I to do ? I'm not paying $300 to find out the answer is no ?
She was offended that I would ask !
Would you want to make promises to random strangers to let them come over to stick their tongues in your mouth? Let me tell you, I used to have nightmares about my escort days. The way some men kiss is absolutely terrifying. And revolting. Whoever she is, at least she's smart enough to not make promises she doesn't feel comfortable keeping once the session begins.
So you are missing my point. I texted the SP to clarify if she is okay with kissing with some tongue actikn which I assume to be DFK. She was offended that I would ask and wouldn't give me an answer.....we have no previos history with each other. A gentleman reviewed her and indicated " no kissing".
I 'm not about to pay the $300 fee to find out she is contrary to kissing !
I 'm not about to pay the $300 fee to find out she is contrary to kissing !
Ask a used car sales man if a car has a service history. If it doesn't, the answers are:
"Maybe."
"It's around here... somewhere."
"I think it should but I am not certain."
Learn the tactics of sales.
You can't compare selling cars with selling intimacy or any sort of sexual service.
Although there is such a thing as a car fetish. But cars don't need to give consent... unless we start talking about the future in regards to advanced technology, artificial intelligence, sex robots and consent. Or even robots not designed for sex. I'll bet there's men out there who would try to bone Rosie from The Jetsons. This will be an ethical concern one day.
but I'm running way off topic here... and this topic in regards to artificial intelligence and consent is worthy of it's own thread. Or even regarding advanced technology, philosophy and human consciousness. What does it truly mean to be human?
but I'm running way off topic here... and this topic in regards to artificial intelligence and consent is worthy of it's own thread. Or even regarding advanced technology, philosophy and human consciousness. What does it truly mean to be human?
There's no difference between selling one thing or another. Selling is selling regardless of medium. It's a tactic, not an expression of respect, to which you are alluding.
The problem is the tactics. YOU are a reputable provider who tells people you don't offer any DFK. Your clients come to you expecting no such thing, they pay you, you do your business, and everyone's happy.
But when someone doesn't answer, it means they have pre-conditions to that sale (DFK) or they don't want to do it but want you to pay first, at which point you have no recourse for a refund.
If a buyer comes to you and says "Maybe I'll pay you, but we have to discuss behind closed doors", how would you feel?
My job as a dominatrix is somewhat different from that of an escort. Some reputable and very successful escorts do well by not making promises and operating on ymmv. Some pooners care more about the quality of the companionship and conversation than a list of acronyms.
But even I have a right to not do everything my subs book for. Most kinksters are ok with that. What's important is that I respect my clients hard limits. But if someone comes to me with just a foot fetish, or bondage and edging I'm obviously not going to try to pull him into the deep end with humiliation and degradation even if he didn't explicitly state it as a hard limit. Common sense prevails.
I don't understand why some men put the value of an intimate sexual encounter on a list of acronyms or number of orgasms :noidea:
Do some of you men do this on civilian dates as well? Are you busy calculating cost of dinner, or the cost of however many dinners it took before she put out compared to number of acronyms you're getting from her while you're in the sack?
Do some of you men do this on civilian dates as well? Are you busy calculating cost of dinner, or the cost of however many dinners it took before she put out compared to number of acronyms you're getting from her while you're in the sack?
You and I are in agreement but we are discussing different points of the same problem.
I asked because one review ....and there was only one....is not enough information. Perhaps the gentleman reviewing her had a axe to grind....who knows ? A yes or no answer from her would have clarified it !
I agree that kissing is not a fetish but she treats it as one by not being willing to speak to it......thus the reason for the title of tis post.....is DFK a fetish ...
I'm not that man. I'm very passionate and I firmly believe kissing is an important part of love making. I have experienced SP's who are poor at at kissing or simply refuse to.There are also those who enjoy kissing and that is where I'll shop.I don't understand why some men put the value of an intimate sexual encounter on a list of acronyms or number of orgasms :noidea:
Do some of you men do this on civilian dates as well? Are you busy calculating cost of dinner, or the cost of however many dinners it took before she put out compared to number of acronyms you're getting from her while you're in the sack?
Oh I have moved on long ago.You are making a lot of assumptions about me, my ability to properly research a SP, and also about her and the type of her personality.
She made no indication in her bio what she favored. She indicated she was fetish friendly but please discuss those with her in person. Thinking that kissing is not a fetish I simply asked about it in a text. Likely I hit a sore point with her. I think she could have simply clarified it by giving an honest answer.
Enough said.
She made no indication in her bio what she favored. She indicated she was fetish friendly but please discuss those with her in person. Thinking that kissing is not a fetish I simply asked about it in a text. Likely I hit a sore point with her. I think she could have simply clarified it by giving an honest answer.
Enough said.
huh? I understand an sp not wanting to promise dfk, but not elaborating on a fetish activity before the appointment is odd. No really my business to tell other ladies how to do their business but I find that strange.
- Status
