Asian Fever

Federal health minister grants extension to safe injection site

ThighMan

It's in the name
Jan 19, 2005
345
0
0
Everywhere

Yman

Lord Lickworthy
Jul 10, 2002
977
2
0
Vancouver
The safe injection site is to prevent the spread of HIV and Hepatitis and death by overdose. That's all !!!

It is not meant to substitute as a treatment facility.

And sadly there are not enough resources put towards prevention and treatment which are considered elements of the four pillars approach.

And we have huge budget surpluses at the Provincial and Federal levels.....

I don't get it
 

Pantherdash

Panther
Apr 2, 2007
2,553
220
63
Downtown Vancouver
One thing people have to understand is that officials are not condoning the practice of injecting heroin. It is harm reduction. Would you rather see needles strewn all over Hastings street? If you have a place where they can inject and dispose their needles, the cleanup job is MUCH easier and the risk to the public is virtually eliminated.

Panther
 

mercyshooter

Ladies' Lover
Aug 5, 2007
2,164
18
38
Vancouver
How old are these people who do needles? Honestly speaking, we have the resources!! :eek: It's just that they don't know how to use it or develop on it!! Do you know the outcome of these diseases? You are either dead at a very very young age or fucking handicapped!!!! And part of your tax money goes to this. :mad: Do you really wanna waste your fucking money on these fucking lazy people? We should shut down these facilities and let these people die all they want!! Just don't be a parasite!! Find a fucking job!!!
 

Creole Lady Marmalade

No more reviews, please.
Dec 20, 2004
1,467
2
0
How old are these people who do needles? Honestly speaking, we have the resources!! :eek: It's just that they don't know how to use it or develop on it!! Do you know the outcome of these diseases? You are either dead at a very very young age or fucking handicapped!!!! And part of your tax money goes to this. :mad: Do you really wanna waste your fucking money on these fucking lazy people? We should shut down these facilities and let these people die all they want!! Just don't be a parasite!! Find a fucking job!!!
And what happens to those that live and continue to use and spread a blood borne illness?

A lot of those who use Insite have jobs.
 

Walk Softly

Member
Sep 13, 2005
713
2
18
Victoria area
As Yman said, the safe injection site is strictly a "harm reduction" strategy: It needs to be used in conjunction with other measures such as addiction counseling, social housing and help for the many street people who are suffering with mental illness and other challenges which are not readily noticeable.

It's not like these people woke up one morning and said "I think I'll become a junkie today"...most of them had issues to begin with and the drug addiction compounds them.

It seems to me that many of them would like to change their lives but don't know how to begin and don't really believe it to be possible .

At a time when police forces all over the country are struggling to recruit enough new members to replace the wave of retirees, it seems really stupid to embark on an American style "War on drugs" when it can be plainly seen that that isn't working for them and never has. As long as there are people out there wanting these substances, there will be others willing to take the risk of providing them for an obscene profit. We learned that in the prohibition era. The only way to end the problem is to convince the people to find healthier sources of recreation. Market dries up = dealers go away!

just my $.02 WS.
 

Sir_frixalot

Big Pink Steel
Nov 15, 2006
227
1
0
Calgs
Why go half way? The Gov'ts of the world should buy an island - name it - Oh, I dunno... Hell...? Anybody caught Using is sent there and dealt with. Courts are there, Rehab is there, supply planes freely come in from Columbia, burials take place there. Seroius addicts wouldn't even try to escape if that's where the supply was... Recreational users stupid enough to get caught and first-timers might be scared shitless and be veeeeewy careful in future.

Out of sight, out of mind. Show the kids the video in Grade 6 and it will be in the back of their mind forever...

Now - about us habitual sex-addidicts. We could be sent to a different tropical island called "paradise" ... Real-time video feeds could pay all the expenses.
 

littlejimbigher

New member
Jun 21, 2006
1,441
4
0
surrey
If they would put some serious money into rehabs and mental health problems, alot of the addicts could be got off the streets. Then I wouldn't mind this injection joint as much.
 

mercyshooter

Ladies' Lover
Aug 5, 2007
2,164
18
38
Vancouver
Why go half way? The Gov'ts of the world should buy an island - name it - Oh, I dunno... Hell...? Anybody caught Using is sent there and dealt with. Courts are there, Rehab is there, supply planes freely come in from Columbia, burials take place there. Seroius addicts wouldn't even try to escape if that's where the supply was... Recreational users stupid enough to get caught and first-timers might be scared shitless and be veeeeewy careful in future.

Out of sight, out of mind. Show the kids the video in Grade 6 and it will be in the back of their mind forever...
Exactly!! :mad:
 

Aerts

Member
Sep 18, 2007
397
4
18
I used to be addicted to morphine, but I got help at at early age and have been clean for years. Injection sites won't help anyone get clean or into treatment, they just legitimize the self destructive behavior they claim to curb...
 

Pantherdash

Panther
Apr 2, 2007
2,553
220
63
Downtown Vancouver
I used to be addicted to morphine, but I got help at at early age and have been clean for years. Injection sites won't help anyone get clean or into treatment, they just legitimize the self destructive behavior they claim to curb...
If addicts want treatment for their problems they have the option of consulting one of the staff, but it is not the sole purpose nor the intended purpose of insite. It is to reduce the amount of discarded needles on the streets, in the alleys, and on school grounds. There are only so many needles the volunteers are able to pick up every morning. If the users have a safe, clean place to shoot up they have no excuse to shoot up on the street.

I don't see it as legitimizing a self destructive behaviour. I think what happened is citizens became so fed up with the amount of needles being strewn on the streets and realized that the drug problem is not going away, so it's better to regulate it with a safe injection site rather than the pre-2003 situation of not doing anything. At least you have some measure of control with Insite.

There is no word from Ottawa in decriminilizing hard drugs, not even soft ones like marijuana (the Bill died when an election was called in 2006), so how can this be legitimizing hard drug use? It's a better alternative, and that's all it is. But I've never used hard drugs so I can only sympathize, not empathize.

Panther
 

ThighMan

It's in the name
Jan 19, 2005
345
0
0
Everywhere
It's not like these people woke up one morning and said "I think I'll become a junkie today".
I have to disagree with you here. For most of them it is a case of "I think I'll become a junkie today".

No one forced them to take drugs, they did so on there own accord. If addiction is a desease (something I do not buy) then it is a self inflicted desease brought on by individual choice. Whether the person had other issues is irrellevent. They made a choice to use drugs and therefore they and not society should have to pay for the concenquences.
 

Lesbian Hunter

Throw Me to the Lesbians
Aug 17, 2006
474
4
0
Victoria
Always love reading the comments in these threads. Ignorance is bliss, eh? :)
Dr. Troy. If you are indeed a member of the medical community, I would think ignorance is not restricted to those outside of your profession.


Death by Medicine

by Gary Null, Ph.D.; Carolyn Dean MD, ND; Martin Feldman, MD; Debora Rasio, MD; and Dorothy Smith, PhD

Something is wrong when regulatory agencies pretend that vitamins are dangerous, yet ignore published statistics showing that government-sanctioned medicine is the real hazard.

Until now, Life Extension could cite only isolated statistics to make its case about the dangers of conventional medicine. No one had ever analyzed and combined ALL of the published literature dealing with injuries and deaths caused by government-protected medicine. That has now changed.

A group of researchers meticulously reviewed the statistical evidence and their findings are absolutely shocking.4 These researchers have authored a paper titled “Death by Medicine” that presents compelling evidence that today’s system frequently causes more harm than good.

This fully referenced report shows the number of people having in-hospital, adverse reactions to prescribed drugs to be 2.2 million per year. The number of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed annually for viral infections is 20 million per year. The number of unnecessary medical and surgical procedures performed annually is 7.5 million per year. The number of people exposed to unnecessary hospitalization annually is 8.9 million per year.

The most stunning statistic, however, is that the total number of deaths caused by conventional medicine is an astounding 783,936 per year. It is now evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the US. (By contrast, the number of deaths attributable to heart disease in 2001 was 699,697, while the number of deaths attributable to cancer was 553,251.5)

We placed this article on our website to memorialize the failure of the American medical system. By exposing these gruesome statistics in painstaking detail, we provide a basis for competent and compassionate medical professionals to recognize the inadequacies of today’s system and at least attempt to institute meaningful reforms.

Natural medicine is under siege, as pharmaceutical company lobbyists urge lawmakers to deprive Americans of the benefits of dietary supplements. Drug-company front groups have launched slanderous media campaigns to discredit the value of healthy lifestyles. The FDA continues to interfere with those who offer natural products that compete with prescription drugs.

These attacks against natural medicine obscure a lethal problem that until now was buried in thousands of pages of scientific text. In response to these baseless challenges to natural medicine, the Nutrition Institute of America commissioned an independent review of the quality of “government-approved” medicine. The startling findings from this meticulous study indicate that conventional medicine is “the leading cause of death” in the United States .

The Nutrition Institute of America is a nonprofit organization that has sponsored independent research for the past 30 years. To support its bold claim that conventional medicine is America 's number-one killer, the Nutritional Institute of America mandated that every “count” in this “indictment” of US medicine be validated by published, peer-reviewed scientific studies.

What you are about to read is a stunning compilation of facts that documents that those who seek to abolish consumer access to natural therapies are misleading the public. Over 700,000 Americans die each year at the hands of government-sanctioned medicine, while the FDA and other government agencies pretend to protect the public by harassing those who offer safe alternatives.

A definitive review of medical peer-reviewed journals and government health statistics shows that American medicine frequently causes more harm than good.

Each year approximately 2.2 million US hospital patients experience adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to prescribed medications.(1) In 1995, Dr. Richard Besser of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimated the number of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed annually for viral infections to be 20 million; in 2003, Dr. Besser spoke in terms of tens of millions of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed annually.(2, 2a) Approximately 7.5 million unnecessary medical and surgical procedures are performed annually in the US,(3) while approximately 8.9 million Americans are hospitalized unnecessarily.(4)

As shown in the following table, the estimated total number of iatrogenic deaths—that is, deaths induced inadvertently by a physician or surgeon or by medical treatment or diagnostic procedures— in the US annually is 783,936. It is evident that the American medical system is itself the leading cause of death and injury in the US . By comparison, approximately 699,697 Americans died of heart in 2001, while 553,251 died of cancer.(5)

The balance of this lengthy article can be found at:

http://http://www.garynull.com/articles/whichArticle.php?article=26
 

Aerts

Member
Sep 18, 2007
397
4
18
I have to disagree with you here. For most of them it is a case of "I think I'll become a junkie today".

No one forced them to take drugs, they did so on there own accord. If addiction is a desease (something I do not buy) then it is a self inflicted desease brought on by individual choice. Whether the person had other issues is irrellevent. They made a choice to use drugs and therefore they and not society should have to pay for the concenquences.
The medical community proved that addiction was a disease a long time ago. Also society is filled with people who are addicted to different drugs, substances, and other things in life. Ergo, a community always bears the burden of the behavior of it's members. So what if someone chose to try something (be it a beer, a joint, a cigarette, narcotics, gambling, pornography, sex for money) that they get addicted to? It doesn't make it their fault that they actually became addicted to it. You could be addicted to something from the first time you try it (which many people with an addictive personality find themselves doing).
 

Lesbian Hunter

Throw Me to the Lesbians
Aug 17, 2006
474
4
0
Victoria
The medical community proved that addiction was a disease a long time ago.
Addiction is not a disease. TB is a disease. Cancer is a disease.

The definition of an addiction: the state of being enslaved to a habit or practice or to something that is psychologically or physically habit-forming, as narcotics, to such an extent that its cessation causes severe trauma.
 

metoo113

Member
Aug 2, 2002
407
0
16
Somewhere Down The Crazy River
I have to disagree with you here. For most of them it is a case of "I think I'll become a junkie today".

No one forced them to take drugs, they did so on there own accord. If addiction is a desease (something I do not buy) then it is a self inflicted desease brought on by individual choice. Whether the person had other issues is irrellevent. They made a choice to use drugs and therefore they and not society should have to pay for the concenquences.
People make the choice to smoke, eat fast food, drink, have unprotected sex, etc. These can all cause self inflicted disease's brought on by individual choice. So why are we as tax payers paying for the treatment that all these addictions create? :D
 

Pantherdash

Panther
Apr 2, 2007
2,553
220
63
Downtown Vancouver
I have to disagree with you here. For most of them it is a case of "I think I'll become a junkie today".

No one forced them to take drugs, they did so on there own accord. If addiction is a desease (something I do not buy) then it is a self inflicted desease brought on by individual choice. Whether the person had other issues is irrellevent. They made a choice to use drugs and therefore they and not society should have to pay for the concenquences.
We're talking about people whose addictions are compounded BECAUSE of disease...mostly mental diseases like schizophrenia, bi-polar, serious diseases of the mind. They are also further complicated by sexual, emotional and physical abuse issues from their childhood.

I know, some people should just say enough of me being the victim, and move on with their lives but we're talking about some SERIOUS life problems. It's just easier for them in the short term to continue with drugs. To say that they one day decided to become a junky is oversimplifying the problem...it's also not realistic.

Panther
 
Vancouver Escorts