I apologize in advance for any stress this might cause. This thread coming hot off the heals from one the most active threads I've seen. Keep in mind, I'm not trying to rationalize an SPs actions here but after personally knowing and seeing some the demented emails the reviewer had sent to many providers in the city, it just surprises me that this was not revealed from those victimized providers.
-After reading TTT defense I noticed she had charged him a reduced rate, I believe half of what she normally would for a session Sunset had requested. If a client requests a 12-24 hour session, is there room for rest?
-The client preordered a meal. While that is galant approach but what if the meal had an allergen sparking a reaction with the provider? Ask first about allergies and likes and dislikes of food.
-Sunset, if she had a smelly pussy, why didn't you grab her hand and take her into the shower with her? Accompanied showers are sexy even with shower caps.
Anyways, it looks to be a key point wasn't picked up on by any naysayers. Sunset blackmailed Tiffany by email. "You will go to Victoria, or I will post a negative review". I think she mentioned that she has that email. Would be neat if she could post it without the incriminating evidence (name, address, etc).
Now just because a member has a ludicriously high post factor it doesn't guarantee accuracy or trust for that matter. I've seen senior members bad-mouth seemingly good-natured and humoured smaller members and others jump right on in not having even checked that the senior member only posted in the lounge.
We've already witnessed the drama regarding a senior member, who at one point was a MOD, stalk a provider. We're just beginning to see that "senior members" can't always be trusted.
I don't know. This is all too sad. It's always a power struggle. Can't we all just get along?
-After reading TTT defense I noticed she had charged him a reduced rate, I believe half of what she normally would for a session Sunset had requested. If a client requests a 12-24 hour session, is there room for rest?
-The client preordered a meal. While that is galant approach but what if the meal had an allergen sparking a reaction with the provider? Ask first about allergies and likes and dislikes of food.
-Sunset, if she had a smelly pussy, why didn't you grab her hand and take her into the shower with her? Accompanied showers are sexy even with shower caps.
Anyways, it looks to be a key point wasn't picked up on by any naysayers. Sunset blackmailed Tiffany by email. "You will go to Victoria, or I will post a negative review". I think she mentioned that she has that email. Would be neat if she could post it without the incriminating evidence (name, address, etc).
Now just because a member has a ludicriously high post factor it doesn't guarantee accuracy or trust for that matter. I've seen senior members bad-mouth seemingly good-natured and humoured smaller members and others jump right on in not having even checked that the senior member only posted in the lounge.
We've already witnessed the drama regarding a senior member, who at one point was a MOD, stalk a provider. We're just beginning to see that "senior members" can't always be trusted.
I don't know. This is all too sad. It's always a power struggle. Can't we all just get along?
