It was a coup de'tat done by what they call Military Triangulation ( three snipers ready to shoot in a triangle), but only one patsy is blamed(Oswald). Anyone who still believes Oswald was the lone gunman are the same people that believe Bin Laden brought down the twin towers.
For ONCE you say something that sane people can agree with.Anyone who still believes Oswald was the lone gunman are the same people that believe Bin Laden brought down the twin towers.
Good one. There is also a whole bunch of loonies who think the moon landing was fake.You could also say that those people are also the people who don't believe that wearing tinfoil hats is important to prevent aliens from reading their minds.
Yet the Warren Commission findings were that Oswald acted alone. So what you are saying is that they should re-open the investigation to look at the Russian connection to the murder. That's fair enough. My guess is that there would have been no hesistation on the part of the U.S. government to re-open the investigation if they thought it was the Russians who were involved. Why would you not want to find out the real reason your president was assassinated?I've always rejected the idea that the assassination of John F Kennedy was planned and executed by Americans, be it the Mafia, the CIA or the Unions. Kennedy had just held the Russians out of Cuba and the Russians were still into using assassination as a tool of diplomacy. They also had the perfect goat in Oswald who willingly went over to and received training in Russia. I agree that it's unlikely that Oswald made the killing shot, in fact, it's almost impossible. However, I thought then, and continue to think that Russia had inserted a team for the job.
oswald was the patsy, agree 100% (and ruby too), who for though? russians, cubans, mobsters (ties to ruby), republicans, military industry (rumor had it kennedy wanted to pull out)It was a coup de'tat done by what they call Military Triangulation ( three snipers ready to shoot in a triangle), but only one patsy is blamed(Oswald). Anyone who still believes Oswald was the lone gunman are the same people that believe Bin Laden brought down the twin towers.
That's an interesting theory. So what you are essentially saying is that it was carried out by Russian intelligence, and the reason it has not been investigated thoroughly is because if the America public would have found out that the Russians were behind it, it would have exposed the potential benefits that were going to be gained by the bankers who were going to cash in enormously from both sides in future proxy wars over the coming decades.Actually, I'm not the only person that thinks that the Russians had something to do with it. And, the Russians didn't get the result they wanted. Before Kennedy died, Vietnam was a sideshow. The Americans were hesitant to commit more than some "advisers" that were non-combat and were not providing the South Vietnamese government with arms and ammunition. Then Johnson became President. The "advisers" were increased to 150,000 in months and became combatants. A year later, all pretense was dropped and American military assets were fully involved. Just as with Iraq, officials appeared before Congress and lied in order to obtain approval for funding levels and troop levels.
The Americans didn't want to confront Russia directly after Cuba. The thought of provoking a nuclear war with a country that would assassinate a head of state was too easy to contemplate.
Instead, the Americans and Russians fought through proxies. Vietnam, South America, Africa, the Mid East. The only direct confrontations were naval and were hidden and denied.
Just as with Afghanistan, Vietnam offered very little to the Americans other than a chance to bloody their noses. In Afghanistan, the Americans funded and armed the Afghan resistance to Russian occupation. There were even American television shows that wrote scripts glorifying the "brave Afghan resistance fighters. That didn't come back to bite, did it?
Inevitability, the Americans will leave Afghanistan and Iraq. Just as they left countries in Africa and South America. The only country that they will not abandon is Israel.
Just as inevitability, Iraq and Afghanistan will become the hosts for armed groups to train for their battle against America and the Western Nations.
The Warren Commission was as cowardly as Jimmy Carter was when he abandoned Iran. The answer scared them, so they lied about the facts and then skulked away.
Oh , but they have managed to keep the Kennedy assassination quiet for 47 years. Go figure!oswald was the patsy, agree 100% (and ruby too), who for though? russians, cubans, mobsters (ties to ruby), republicans, military industry (rumor had it kennedy wanted to pull out)
warren commission, what a pos wot report, totally unbeliveable
as for you twin towers theory, sorry bullshit, too many people involved to keep it secret, even gore can't get a rub and tug without being outted
how about UFO's, yes/no/other?
BTW my friend, not being one of your sheeple does NOT make me one of theirs
I agree with most of what you are saying. If the Russians were involved it still would of been with American intelligence support. Why else would they have left him exposed like a sitting duck? It has never been about American's making money off of war. The people who make money are the Rothchilds and Rockerfellers of the world. There is a good documentary from 1995 called 'The Money Masters'. Just Google the title or producer Bill Still. It explains how corrupt the U.S. banking system is, and goes back as far as the Roman Empire to talk about how people like Ron Paul have tried to resist the takeover of the corrupt banking system throughout history, and with some pockets of success I might add.If you watch Fadden of CSIS in his testimony before Parliament, you'll see why the Warren Commission pretended that the Russian connection didn't exist. People that tell truths that the politicians don't want to hear get fired and unable to do any good in the background. Richard Fadden was quite correct about the influence of other nations in Canadian politics. When I heard the CBC interview, I knew he was a man that was shortly going to be unemployed.
American politicians didn't want a document on the official record that said the Russians had assassinated their President. The only possible response to that would have been war. That war would have meant that civilization as we know it would have ceased to exist.
The 9-11 commission was constrained in a similar manner. Everyone knows that the Saudis were involved in the funding and the logistics of the attacks on September 11, 2001. Following the trail of the Saudis who had shorted Airline stocks and documenting the Saudi involvement would have turned off the taps on the oil America needs and caused a financial collapse worse than what happened in 2008. Back in 2001, the Saudis were the largest holder of American debt. Instead, when the Americans "restored" the servers that underlie the financial system, they rolled it back and made the Saudi short selling cease to exist.
The reason the Americans act in this manner is not to make money off of war. It's because that even in the 1960s, the Americans were a debtor nation. In order to enjoy being the premier consumer nation with the largest number of people who are on government assistance, the Americans carry debt that they don't intend to ever repay. The cost is that the American government doesn't permit the truth about the debt to be talked about and they don't permit "insult" of the people that they owe the money to.






