Ex-Swedish Touch "Masseuse" Files for Divorce

tyc

New member
Sep 16, 2004
26
0
1
45
Great story. A warning to all Perbs.

http://www.theprovince.com/life/fas...ce+finds+they+were+racking/8213459/story.html




He met her when she worked at a Vancouver massage parlour but their marriage didn’t have a happy ending


BY KEITH FRASER, THE PROVINCEAPRIL 8, 2013




A Surrey couple’s relationship ended only a month after they married with both sides accusing each other vandalism, privacy breaches and abuse.
Photograph by: Handout, Vancouver Sun
Their lavish lifestyle resulted in them racking up $4 million in debt, on annual living expenses in excess of $1 million.

Details of the Surrey couple’s finances and their vitriolic relationship were outlined in an interim divorce ruling that was issued Monday.

The couple, who are only identified by initials, own two properties in South Surrey each valued at between $1.5 million and $2.5 million or more.

Their “stable” of expensive vehicles includes an Audi R8, a Porsche Panamera and a Maserati GT. They also own two boats — an $800,000 yacht and a $100,000 ski boat.

The wife met her husband about 10 years ago and they began living together several years later before marrying on June 16, 2012. They separated in July that year.

She had a son from a prior relationship and he had two children from a previous relationship, both of whom lived with their mom.

They had a child together, a son now eight years old.

The wife alleges that after they separated, he cut off her access to cash and credit cards and therefore her previous lifestyle, as well as denying her access to her cars.

The woman, who worked at the Swedish Touch Massage Parlour in Vancouver at the time they met but no longer is employed, claims that he favours the son they had together and has physically assaulted the son she had previously.

She says that her husband, a self-employed architect, bugged her Porsche in order to listen to her private conversations and had experts uncover intimate photos of her communicating with a person in Florida with whom she now has a relationship.

For his part, the husband denied the alleged physical abuse and claims that she is a “self-absorbed” gaming addict who does little if any proper parenting. He accuses her of name-calling aimed at him and the kids, infidelity and damage to or destruction of property.

He also accuses her of petty acts of vandalism including pouring liquid on his bed, spreading cat litter on his desk and depositing broken eggs and dog feces on his Audi R8.

She in turned denied his allegations.

“In particular,she denies any knowledge regarding the acts of vandalism and she denies having taken various items of the respondent’s personal belongings including a Piaget watch, his personal jewelry and a white gold wedding band,” said B.C. Supreme Court Master Ian Caldwell in the ruling released Monday.

Caldwell was asked to deal with a number of pre-trial issues, including occupancy of the two large homes, parenting arrangements and interim support for the claimant and the children.

He noted that one thing the couple had agreed to was sharing joint custody of the children. He ordered that the residence of the children be shared equally and that the parents remain guardians of the kids.

The wife will remain in the matrimonial home and the husband will have the other home. Interim child support was set at $4,500 a month and spousal support at $11,000 a month.

kfraser@theprovince.com

twitter.com/keithrfraser

© Copyright (c) The Province
 

Alix Turner

Member
Apr 27, 2011
433
0
16
Why is it a warning? let's see. She was an MP attendant. He was obviously wealthy, with a high income. Now she is living in his house, with an annual income of of 132K per year on the spousal support, plus another 54K in child support, driving a car he paid for, just because she had his kid. She's clearly batshit crazy and has major issues. While he is no boy scout, it seems pretty damn clear she was waiting for her meal ticket and she found it. Total cost to him will be in the millions.

If that's not a warning to you Badger, you might want to stop seeing SP's. The warning is - you pay them to leave, not just to fuck you. Dating a provider is problematic. Marrying one can be more trouble. Knocking one up can be financial ruin. Especially one who is clearly a blood sucker like this one. How's that for a warning?
You pay us to leave, others decide to hire for their own reasons. I believe you yourself have talked about the trouble you experienced financially after divorcing someone who was not a service provider. Divorce can be very expensive and messy, even more so when you have a child together. It's not like that's a sexworker specific problem.
 

Master69

Banned
Jan 23, 2011
954
3
0
Lower Slobbovia
The fact she is a SP is immaterial.

As a wise man once told me: "M69, my young man, if it flies, floats or fucks, rent it, don't buy it".

This pooner got into a "rent-to-own" program. The problem was the "own" part, not the "rent".
 

Bobo The Rabbit

Senior Member
May 10, 2002
1,557
9
38
51
Edmonton
A lot of SPs have "issues", there's a few who are nice and normal, however very very few.
I'm amazed they were together for so long and then married. If she is legit crazy then he should of noticed earlier and never married her.

I think this whole "in the life style she is accustomed to" is retarded.
Spousal and child support should not be 160k a year... That's insane.

There is something very wrong with our society.
 

scene-itb4

New member
Oct 29, 2004
9
0
1
Edmonton
One of those perhaps marriage will save us syndromes. More like marriage will solidify us a couple and aid in the divorce proceedings. Worst of all, an eight year old is caught in the middle and debt levels are so high, you know the lifestyle will change and both parties will have to give up a lot. As said above, "rent it, don't buy it".
 

kauffman

person impersonator
May 8, 2011
215
0
0
Something one can never pinpoint
Why is it a warning? let's see. She was an MP attendant. He was obviously wealthy, with a high income. Now she is living in his house, with an annual income of of 132K per year on the spousal support, plus another 54K in child support, driving a car he paid for, just because she had his kid. She's clearly batshit crazy and has major issues. While he is no boy scout, it seems pretty damn clear she was waiting for her meal ticket and she found it. Total cost to him will be in the millions.

If that's not a warning to you Badger, you might want to stop seeing SP's. The warning is - you pay them to leave, not just to fuck you. Dating a provider is problematic. Marrying one can be more trouble. Knocking one up can be financial ruin. Especially one who is clearly a blood sucker like this one. How's that for a warning?
and the man had no choices in this relationship? come on! If she was working at the swedish touch she was likely making tons of her own money. Problem is a "date" is a fantasy and not a realistic interaction to base "falling in love" on. Men are not stupid beings. They are often looking for the shortest route to good sex and a hot wife by dating escorts sometimes. most women erquire a long process of dating dinners getting to know one another.... etc etc before there is sex at all and by then after all time and money spent it may not be that good or she might not look as good naked as he was hoping. Few women dress up in lingerie lookk perfect are great in the sack on the first date and put all their effort into pleasing the man. Men who date escorts are just hoping that skipping all the usual first steps might still get them what they want . they'll get to know her later but be assured she's hot and good in bed. So come on.... both parties were looking for something and going about it in a generally backwards way. SHe wanted a guy with money and hoped she'd like him too. So lets not place all the blame on her. He choose his priorities too.
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts