Thanks very much, and from the little research I've done too, she looks like she just started posting as 27, and was posting as 26 before, so she seems like she is posting her real age. She obviously looks youthful in her pictures, it's not like she would be a TOFTT, what with all her good reviews. The fear is that she may not be as down to earth as she once was, that years of service may have jaded her, and that she is fairly famous in these circles, and making decent money, may go to her head. I have yet to meet her so I will never make any judgements, but she sounds like a very kind girl from the reviews I have read.
Emmy St. Claire
- Thread starter naknek
- Start date
I freaking love you Dawgspeed, your amusing and well written posts are one of the reasons I finally started reviewing and posting around the forum. Classic.
Buddy.
Not sure how I could have been any clearer here.
My comments, tongue in cheek, were directed at the OP. Nowhere have I bashed Emmy.
No "raising a stink....", and no ulterior motives. Simply my opinion an naknek's "review".
Enough riding to his defense- he's been on the boards as a member a hell of a lot longer than you, and I'm sure he's not too offended by my post. If the term "useless" is that offensive, then take your own advice and grow a thicker skin.
If or when I ever respond to a thread of yours, feel free to open up on me with both barrels as you see fit. I DO have a thick skin.
Let's just put this one to bed.
Happy pooning bro.
I also don't like to see first time posters take flak. I've been quite vocal on this in the past when "senior members" call 'Shill' everytime a noobie posts favourable comments on their first experience- really pisses me off. My first post was also a glowing review- I didn't feel the need to start off trashing just to gain the respect of others.Nothing personal, you're entitled to your opinion as is everyone else. I like details too, but I'm not too worried about that when the review is for a lady that has already been reviewed literally dozens of times.
Honestly, I'm just tired of seeing new reviewers take flak from the members here and never post another review again. Maybe if we were all a bit nicer about a guy's first attempt at sharing, we'd get more than the 5-10 reviews a month we've seen in this forum for the past year or so. Let's see if we can keep the new blood posting instead of always scaring them away.
In naknek's case I looked at the tenure of his membership and felt that a tongue in cheek comment was a healthy way to point something out. There was no intent to scare naknek away from further contributions, although some have taken this as a full-on assault. Nothing could be further from the truth.
These threads can take on a life of their own- this one has been hijacked long enough.
I'll step out now and let the thread move forward as it was intended- one member's recounting of his memorable experience for the edification of the rest of us.
Happy pooning bro.
Last edited:
Ddcanz - you're not the only one who called the OP out so please don't think all of this was directed solely at you.
And while you first post on this thread can easily be read as tongue in cheek, you might want to re-read your following posts and see if comments like the ones below carry the same tone.
And while you first post on this thread can easily be read as tongue in cheek, you might want to re-read your following posts and see if comments like the ones below carry the same tone.
ddcanz said:
Now ask yourself if it's possible that a nervous first time reviewer might read those comments along with some of the other critical ones and say "screw these guys" and stop posting?
Again, I stand by my comments. Some of them were made in response to other replies. How others choose to interpret them is on them, as it's on me how I interpreted naknek's OP.
And yes, it IS possible that these comments could be taken as extremely critical. Whether naknek is a "nervous first time reviewer" or a seasoned vet in sheep's clothing- he has never posted a single review in 7+ years of membership, but merely lurked and gleaned info from other member's posts, including yourself- is not the point here. If he says "screw those guys" and stops posting, well, are we losing out? He's never posted anything since signing up. Zip, zilch, nada, bupkiss. But that doesn't mean he isn't enjoying himself all the same.
This is not meant to deter him or other noobs from posting reviews, merely my two-cents worth on the subject. Agree or disagree.
And I don't take ANY of this personally (well, maybe the "fuckin' head up my ass" remark was a bit offside!
ound: ). We all have our writing styles, and with the written word there is inherently room for misinterpretation.Some will continue to flame me regardless, but whatevs. As noted to another, I DO have a thick skin
So, can we put this one to bed at last?
Cheers mate!
...... (and BTW, he's not a new guy- just a first time poster- there's a big diff) :nod:Lol this thread has lost control and I am certain Emmy is watching this thread with great amusement! I do have to say though, your first post in 7 years? Really? That is a long time I'm sure numerous ladies have come and gone in that time, you must have had at least 4 or 5 sessions that you could review from the past 7 years. I thought I was bad enough going several months with a different handle I didn't feel comfortable posting under, I just used my standard user name so that I could at least log in and use the search function, that was the initial reason I signed up, was to search lol. I have changed it now and I'm at least willing to start sharing some of my experiences, several of them with current agency girls. I have just recently branched out into the Indy scene, hence my interest in this thread, and will continue to share my experiences as I did with Tracy and Amisha.
Yeah, I think we can agree to disagree here. We definitely have different philosophies on personal accountability for our words.
I firmly believe that we are each responsible for the impact our communication has on our audience, while your statement above suggests that you feel it's your audience that is responsible for gleaning the correct interpretation, meaning, and intent of your words.
If the objective of communication is to convey information and understanding, leaving it all up to your audience to figure out what you really mean seems like a pretty risky strategy, but to each their own.
I met with Emmy a few days ago she is beautiful, sensuous, attentive and a joy to be with. Clearly she has no shortage of well deserved good reviews need I go on... I will book with her again in the future. Prior to this I sourced most of the reviews about her from this very thread and I found that Naknek's, grizzly5, D12 & JakeC28 posts were very influential:thumb:
Cheers
Cheers
