Emily at DejaVu

[prairie_boy]

Well, I finally broke down last Sunday and ventured into the Edmonton MP scene with Emily...and was very happy. Her picture on the website is accurate....she is a sweet girl of about 19-20.

Even though she told me that she was tired (having worked ALL day long), she made an awesome effort to make sure that I was pleased when I left. We went through cbj, CG, mish, doggie, etc several times during the hour. She kept at it for the ENTIRE hour too...I must have been tired or something or I would never have lasted that long.

Over-all I was seriously impressed. I had high expectations and she more than met them. I'll leave it at that, since adding number ratings won't really give you guys any extra information (me not having the experience to provide valid comparisons). Very nice girl. Thanks Emily.

 

[rafterman]

Are you sure that picture of Emily is genuine. Looks like it was downloaded off the net somewhere. I question the pictures of Jade and Diamond as well. They just look too good i.e. too professional. Other ladies photos on the deja vu site just have that look that they are real. i.e shot in the studio not pulled off some other website.

Just my .02 cents

 

[trawler]

Authentic

All pictures on the website are accurate. I have met all the girls.

 

[BigDDD]

I've not met Diamond, but the picture of Jade on the website is indeed the real Jade.

 

[wolverine]

I found this lovely picture of Playboy Playmate Avis Miller aka Miss November 1970.

 

[trawler]

Emily's Picture

Had me fooled!!

 

[wolverine]

Now before things get outta hand, I would like to say a couple of things:

1. Just because we pooners do most of our thinking with our purple helmets doesn't necessarily mean that we are gullible idiots. All SPs would do well to remember this. Do not insult our intelligence.

2. I hope this revelation doesn't discourage Emily from quitting the business. In fact, if Deja Vu posts a true pic of her then all is forgiven as far as I'm concerned. Learn from your mistakes and forge ahead.

 

[daddy o]

The picture really did look like you when I seen you. I don't think it is any worse of a crime than posting a picture with alot of airbrushing done. I had one of the best times with you so it doesn't even matter to me, I'll be back. Us little "detectives" were bound to find out though.

 

[Mikey]

hehe, just thought that i'd also agree with emily that the picture linked here could damn near be her twin sister as she looks almost identical and same physique.

 

[wolverine]

I dunno about this, Emily. I really don't. If you are worried about revealing your identity to family and friends, you can always hide or cover up the face. Reasonable facimile or not, I'm just wary of those who post false pictures of themselves, that's all. I understand your reasoning behind it. But I think there's better ways of doing it.

And finally, keep in mind that I don't peruse the SP websites for masturbationary material. I look at the pics and profiles to see who may be worthy of my time and money without having to drive from one end of the city to the other to "circle-jerk" at each MP...I simply don't have the time for that. Only when I see an SP who attracts me will I pay a visit for a personal first impression. I'll never understand this misguided mindset amongst some SPs that their web pics are nothing more than free jerk-off material. Especially since there's far superior jerk-off material to be found on the internet if that's what I want. Those pics are important marketing tools...nothing more.

 

[jim]

Well said Wolverine.

I agree, Emily I think you had 2 other choices that are more palatable. Either hide your face or blur it out as Wolverine said or don't include one at all.

If you want a third choice, then identify your pic as a facisimile and not really you.

My 2 cents.

 

[daddy o]

Just thinking... duo, Emily and Avis Miller. Too much to handle?

 

[Bueller]

I have to wonder, does it really matter? How many guys go in for a massage based exclusively on the looks of an SP and the quality of her picture on a website? How many guys honestly believe that most of the pictures on the various websites are actually of the SP's themselves?
Dunno about you guys, but I find the L/A/S scale is done in reverse order. Emily has shown outstanding A in actually coming on to this board during her off time and talking and flirting with us.
I personally find any picture on a website is preferable to an animated gif saying Hello! Let's party!

 

[littlejonny]

As far as a duo with Emily and Avis Miller, I would say no. Chances are Avis doesn't quite look like her picture anymore. If it was a duo with her and some of the other girls at Deja Vu though, I would probably say yes, even if chances of heart failure go up. Also, I agree with Bueller. Emily's attitude has been A1 so far on this board and I hope she continues to contribute. As long as she bears a strong resemblance to the picture, I say no harm done. I've noticed in the past that sometimes the girls don't quite look like their picture on the web even if the the picture actually is of them anyways. Tricks like stretching the picture and air brushing are very easy to do.

 

[kneel2]

How many guys go in for a massage based exclusively on the looks of an SP and the quality of her picture on a website? How many guys honestly believe that most of the pictures on the various websites are actually of the SP's themselves?

I for one do. I expect pics on the website to be of the SP and have gone in to visit many a girl based STRICTLY on the pictures I've seen. And yes, more often than not the girls do look a little different in real life. Of course they're going to post their best picture, that's to be expected.

To say that I'm being naive or gullible is a disservice to the many SP's that post real pics of themselves (most of them which is truly appreciated). And while Emily's attitude may be great, I congratulate wolverine for exposing the truth. Hmm, TheSmokingGunforEdmontonSPs.com?

 

[BigDDD]

The look of a sp is not the most important factor in my book, I will pick a sp with a resonable high rating on attitide, cause I got burned way too many times. I look at the pic in the web more for the body type.

 

[Dr Phibes]

Hey come on Helga's not that bad. You're just stereotyping her because of her name man.

That's nameism

 

[pargolfer]

An untouched original picture $200.00
An airbrushed original picture $100.00

A SP with the right attitude PRICELESS

There isn't ONE picture posted on an MP website that's 100% the same in person. Get over it !

 

[prairie_boy]

As has been said, the pic is so close to what she really looks like that it is ridiculous to worry about it.

Anyone who chooses to visit Emily based on that pic is NOT being deceived or tricked at all. If you are all concerned about it not being her, you must be enjoying a nice (overly) sheltered life and really be struggling to find an "issue" to be concerned about...

 

[bigdaddy]

This goes to all SP&members of this forum........." Please keep it real" for this is what we go by when we want to see a SP.I think you are doing more bad than good when fake pics are put on the web-site.The money that is spent in this hobby can add up to be a lot by one person ,so that is why we need the posts and pics to be the real thing.The only person you are hurting is yourself{SP} if this continues.You might get them to the door but after the hobbiest takes one look he will probobly go.The pic will not do the selling ,it will be how the session went.Hopefully this will keep everyone happy.