...a panicked population WITH THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS!!!They need to stop it before people do panic.
And I bet you a lot of people are worried about the same thing, the disease and a panicked population on top of it.
Ebola is quite a few levels higher than SARS in terms of risk.Yep. You're right there. Remember how western civilization collapsed and there were millions dead in the streets when there was that SARS outbreak a few years back. It will all happen again in exactly the same way if a few people with ebola are not caught within hours of entering a western country.
It isn't the only experimental treatment, there are a number of others as well. In fact, one of them is being developed right here in Burnaby.Interesting to note, the only known treatment for Ebola??????
Comes from Winnipeg a doctor there working in the High Level disease lab there has isolated anti- bodies from monkeys.
Which are then grown in tobacco plants in a lab in
Arizona I believe.
Has produced a drug called z-ma???? which is in very limited supply, it is what has believed to have saved the aid workers to this point,
My opinion is simply that my opinion,
But I wish people that threw out facts and figures, would actually know of what they speak,
I disagree with your statement that "no one gave a shit". They did, but there is not much they can do.Ok. I believe I covered that pig/monkey study earlier. Again, my friend knows about the study (he told me about it long before it was in the news). I believe I quoted him earlier, perhaps you should read it.
The vaccine/treatment that was used on the cases in Georgia this summer (with great success!) is the one that was developed in Winnipeg 10 years ago.
Catching it from a door knob IS physical contact, isn't it? It sure isn't airborne
We needed to do more earlier, it's too little too late now. Unfortunately at this point I think more people will get sick before this goes away. A lot more.
My friend knew about this from when the first few cases were diagnosed, he knew they were asking for help and not receiving it. Suddenly it's a white man problem and everyone is screaming for action. It's pretty shitty. Until the first public cases hit the USA, no one here even gave a shit (except my friend and some of his colleagues and a few people).
Maybe next time people will pay more attention.
I hope the governments who didn't heed the calls for aid get some public recognition in their role in this.
He and I have been watching this from the start, he predicted it would get this big. He's been upset about it for a long time. He's requested leave from the uni so he can go help, he's awaiting word back about that.
You are wrong. It just takes one irresponsible person to seed infection all over the place. Any infected person who gets into our country uncontrolled is potentially a big problem. And basic hygiene is not enough.Fortunately our system will handle any cases that show up, so the chances of a large scale outbreak is basically zero for that exact reason. It won't have the chance to get out of control, unless MASSES OF PEOPLE flood our country and don't report their illness and everyone stops washing their hands/basic hygiene.
We will have a handle on it from the beginning, the way they would have in Africa if their calls for aid hadn't been ignored.
I also suspect that aids is hosted in fruity bats........We know that it is hosted in fruit bats.....
Risk is a function of ease of infection and the outcome of infection. In SARS a negative outcome happened in 5-10% of known infections, so even if everyone got infected a lot of people would die but society would not collapse. Prior immunisation against flu provides some protection, so the number of unrecorded (and non-fatal) infections is likely quite a bit higher than the known infection, which means that the real mortality rate is quite a bit lower. Ebola has a 60-90% negative outcome rate, depending on the level of treatment the infected person receives. There is no immunity derived from exposure to other virus, so a successful infection is going to be a known infection. The mortality rate from ebola is at least an order of magnitude higher than that for SARS, and probably more than that.No, it wasn't. When SARS came at us we didn't know what bacterium or virus caused it (a corona virus). We didn't didn't know what animal(s) hosted it (civets). We didn't know its incubation period or if it was infectious before symptoms showed. We quickly learned that it was an airborne pathogen and victims often needed mechanical assistance to support respiration & there were a limited number of such equipment available even of first world countries.
Ebola we know. We know of various strains of the virus. We know that it isn't airborne. We know that it isn't infectious until the infected person is symptomatic. We know that it is hosted in fruit bats and a number of other animals. We have some treatments that show promise. The most basic treatment of the disease does not require equipment that is in short supply in first world countries. And we've had months and months to get our ducks in a row to prepare for it's eventual arrival.
The problem at the beginning of the epidemic was not treatment or control of those who were sick, it was controlling those who didn't know or believe they were sick. Lack of supplies might have meant people were more likely to die, but it was not responsible for the spread of the disease. That is a management issue that properly belongs to the governments of those countries and societies. Or more accurately, a lack of functional management. It is not something outsiders realistically could have done anything about since they don't run those governments.Well my friend knows people who were on the ground when the first cases were discovered. They were asking for help, and were not given nearly enough. Help can be in the form of supplies, you know! And I'm well aware of the distrust, again my friend has studied infectious disease in Africa and told me first hand what he experienced. The local witch doctors want to keep control so they tell their people that the white man BROUGHT Ebola!
I am aware of these things, I assure you. My previous statement is true. The WHO is hugely under-funded, it receives a fraction of what the cdc gets, yet it's expected to handle these types of situations anywhere in the world.
Gee, Miss Melody, kudos to you for trying to educate us on medical issues such as infectious diseases, viruses, medication, injections and God knows what all.How many times do I have to say it: the virus they studied isn't relevant to the one that's is affecting west Africa. That study is about OTHER filoviruses, it even says so.
.
As of 2 months ago, approximately 240 health care workers had become infected, it is probably quite a bit more now. So the rate of infection among health care workers is considerably higher than the general population. In the event of a widespread outbreak they will be the first sub-population to be taken out, and after that who does the nursing? You will have to take care of your family yourself, and you will not be equipped to do that and escape infection yourself. Single people will die alone in their condos, the city will be saturated with corpses all over that no one knows about. It will be a mess. That is the problem with something like Ebola, it is manageable in small isolate outbreaks, but in a pandemic it will be devastating.Risk is a function of what you know about the issue in the moment as well as those other things. We know a lot about ebola and knew little about SARS. We have a fairly good understanding of what needs to be done to deal with the few cases of ebola that will make their way to Canada and robust capability to execute. Given the dispersed nature of civilization in te world today, it is unlikely that any natural disease has the capability to end civilization. It would likely take the impact of a fairly large celestial body to end civilization.
Ebola is not a civilization ending disease for any first world country. Protocols may need to be adjusted, that is all. Infection control protocols are made only as arduous and complex as necessary to mitigate the risk. To date, it looks like there are rare instances where contact is made with the contaminated outside of PPE and health professionals' mucous membranes or eyes without adequate washing (with either soap & water or alcohol based sanitizer) in between. They are also only double gloving and not triple gloving. There are still more robust decontamination procedures that can be undertaken before beginning to remove the PPE than the existing protocol calls for so the protocol can be upgraded as needed.
As for health professionals being a high percentage of the infected, this is not mathematically possible, given the high numbers of infected and the very low numbers of health workers on the ground in the affected areas. Given that a great number of the indigenous health workers had no PPE at all, not even disposable gloves & masks, and the clinics were all open wards there should be no surprise that such folks who spend a lot of time caring for many infected people become infected.
240 infected 2 months ago represented about 5-10% of the total. That is not an insignificant number when you consider the ratio of doctors to patients out there (closer to 100000 to 1). Granted, that includes nurses and nurse aids, but still, that is a very high percentage relative to the general population.Utter tripe of the worst kind. A comparison not of of apples with oranges but of apples with Lego blocks.
Yes, in those African countries the small number of health care workers infected represent a large percentage of the workers there, but they still represent a minority of the cases. Since the majority of the local health workers had no capability of enacting the recommended protocols they had little chance. The western health workers that came in were also grossly short of equipment, materiel and supplies and working in primitive clinics and wards. They've done somewhat better but are challenged when things as simple as bleach are sometimes in short or erratic supply.
Looking at first world countries, how many infected people have been evacuated to them so far? 10? 20? About 20 or so health care workers work on each case so more than 200 health workers have had their first live ebola case to deal within their hospitals. Out of them, a couple slipped up: less than 1%. Those cases will cause the protocols to be tweaked and cause health workers to redouble their focus on getting it right. There will be more cases brought into first world countries, both evacuations and people arriving infected. There will be more cases of error, but the error rate is likely to drop as people train more intensively in the protocols.





