Drones in Canada with bombs pending

InnocentBoy

Banned
Mar 5, 2006
846
5
18
According to CBC News, the Canadian government is looking forward to giving drones a more prominent role in police, agriculture and military applications.
Smaller-sized drones are used for surveying crop health in southern Alberta. (CBC)
“High-tech robots being developed by a group of scientists near Medicine Hat, Alberta., could soon be used to detect leaks in pipelines or avalanches in the mountains,” the CBC News writes.
The report goes on to say that local law enforcement is already using drones for surveillance: “Elsewhere in the country, at least one section of the Ontario Provincial Police deploys the machines to take high-quality photos of crime scenes and traffic collisions.”
Jared Giesbrecht with Defense Research Development Canada, a government agency whose purpose it is to supply scientific and technological advancements for Canadian Forces said, “The reason why we do what we do is to keep soldiers safe and to ease their burden,” which would indeed be a very noble endeavor, if we didn’t already know the routine sleight of hand exploited to sell ideas to the public.
Recently, Canada attempted to justify its need for more advanced drone technology to prepare for a resource war that would break out should the polar ice caps melt. “The thinking goes like this: As global warming causes the northern polar ice to recede — and one day disappear during the summer months — nations like Russia, Canada, Norway and the United States will scramble for the bountiful deposits of oil, gas and minerals hidden beneath, sparking an Arctic resource war,” reports Wired.com.
Reportedly, Canada is already using drones the size of DVD players to monitor agriculture, as was the case in Nebraska and Iowa.
The CBC did not venture to mention the obvious threats domestic drones pose to citizens’ privacy.
Earlier this month, the Canadian Department of National Defense announced its intent to appropriate $1 billion for drones to be outfitted with hellfire missiles and other bombs.
Matthew Behrens, of Rabble.ca, isn’t fooled by the mainstream illusion. He writes,
“The drones are also touted as vehicles by which Canada somehow “saves lives,” but this equation always leaves out the lives at risk on the ground. Over 3,000 souls have been slaughtered from the skies in the not-so-secret and clearly illegal drone war waged by Obama and his minions in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and the rapidly evolving technology is also being used to prevent refugees from finding asylum and to target political demonstrations. Drones represent the ultimate tool in a 24/7 surveillance and punishment society: the forces of control can always monitor us and, when convenient, vaporize us, without any sense of transparency or accountability.”
While touting the importance of safety, the CBC also conveniently fails to address the detrimental psychological effects associated with drones buzzing overhead. Behrens goes on,
“Last year, Pakistan’s Foundation for Fundamental Rights, in conjunction with U.K. human rights group Reprieve, brought together 350 people to discuss the traumas of life under the drones, which many reported seeing 10 to 15 times a day. The anxiety of never knowing when the hovering drones will strike is unimaginable: war by drone is a form of torture, an indefinite death sentence hanging over the heads of villagers that can be executed at any time of the day and night. And the victims never know what hit them, as Hellfire missiles travel faster than the speed of sound. In addition, after a drone strike, villagers often face death squads who believe someone in the village provided targeting data. Kidnappings and torture ensue, a convenient extension of the “kill chain” that begins back in a Nevada bunker.”
Replies in the comments section of the CBC article shows some Canadians are actually happy about the prospect of drone integration. One user writes, “there are so many reaching applications for these marvels, lets let them spread thier [sic] wings.” Another user says, “Great technology! This will be a lot better than the F35 project, and will cost the taxpayers less, and still achieve the same results.”
One user, however, was not brainwashed by the drone propaganda. He stated,
“Great new venture…but my concern is that our premiere in AB went to a Bildeberger Meeting in Virginia…which is a elite secret business group started by the Nazi prince Bernhard! An ss member no less. Drones are in neighborhoods in the US!? Why are jets spraying us with aluminum and bariaum since Reford got in? Is this poisoning going to be automated? Is this a front organization for covert ops like the Chem Trail spraying companies in Calgary and Winnipeg airports?”
Transport Canada is doing everything in their power to loosen drone restrictions, and, if successful, it won’t be long before drones are regularly patrolling Canadian neighborhoods.
 

badbadboy

Well-known member
Nov 2, 2006
9,547
300
83
In Lust Mostly
Nice copy/paste without your own opinion :D


Drones are not a new technology. They were first developed in the late 1970's in and around the Medicine Hat AFB. Their 'high tech' credibility didn't really occur until after 9/11 but the technology was there for years.

Surveillance for the most part benefit all of us in this post 9 / 11 world or for use around Vancouver during the Olympics etc.
 

JClay

Member
Jun 21, 2007
72
0
6
One user, however, was not brainwashed by the drone propaganda. He stated,
“Great new venture…but my concern is that our premiere in AB went to a Bildeberger Meeting in Virginia…which is a elite secret business group started by the Nazi prince Bernhard! An ss member no less. Drones are in neighborhoods in the US!? Why are jets spraying us with aluminum and bariaum since Reford got in? Is this poisoning going to be automated? Is this a front organization for covert ops like the Chem Trail spraying companies in Calgary and Winnipeg airports?”
Oh shit, son - here we go. Tinfoil hats on, boys and girls, don't want the Man to steal our precious brainwaves and/or bodily fluids.
 

HeMadeMeDoIt

New member
Feb 12, 2004
2,029
2
0
Should I be worried that the armed drones will fire hellfire missioles on me on HWY1 for going 30km over the speed limit :D
 

Tugela

New member
Oct 26, 2010
1,913
1
0
How is a drone remotely operated by a police officer any different from a helicopter or a regular patrol vehicle? The only difference is that one has the officer inside it while the other has the officer at a desk somewhere. It is a lot more efficient and probably cheaper to have the officer sitting at the desk.

Beyond that drones are usefull whenever someone needs to do surveilance over a broad area (such as site security or collecting some sort of survey information) or inspect a hazardous site (fires, spills etc).

There are a lot of uses for them, the main reason they are not widely used is because of civil aviation regulation, not because of privacy concerns (allthough no doubt the folk with criminal intentions won't want them in the air).
 

sevenofnine

Active member
Nov 21, 2008
2,016
9
38
its the future
the weakest part of an aircraft is the idoit flying it.
future fighter jets will not have a pilot

perhaps the last jet fighter designed with a pilot will be the f-35 and the raptor
the human body can not stand the g-forces,
and most plane accidents are from human error
planes now days are designed in such a way with so many features built in to protect us from the pilot flying it.
 
Vancouver Escorts