Your examples of definitions are irrelevant. People call it a hobby because they like to sugar coat the truth or don't want to call a spade a spade. It's not a hobby if you would not share with the general public that you do it."Not by any legitimate definition"?! I just cited the dictionary. What do you consider a source of legitimate definitions?
Whether you feel comfortable sharing it or not is not a part of the definition. We all get it: you don't like the word. But the word means what it means, not what you want it to mean. Watching TV meets the definition. Getting shitfaced drunk on the regular every Friday meets the definition. Stealing hubcaps for fun meets the definition. It's unlikely anyone would answer the job interview question with any of those things, but that's really quite irrelevant.
Quite the opposite is true: It is not a hobby in your mind but is by legitimate definition.
Your arguments are irrelevant. People call it a hobby because they want to sugar coat the truth of what it actually is or are ashamed to call a spade a spade.
Apologies. Had to take a shot. If a person is going to be pedantic, they need to back it up with objective facts not subjective feelings.
Personally though I don't see a problem with generic. "Consultant" is generic too but people put it on business cards without added context.
Do sp's rate their clients?
- Thread starter volvoguy1979
- Start date
To summarise: "Definitions are irrelevant so the dictionary's is wrong and mine is right." That in itself is a self-contradictory statement.
The problem here is you think "hobby" sugar coats and you don't like that. The reality is the word hobby has no moral implication one way or another. You're inserting a connotation that isn't there.
It'd be like arguing there can be no such thing as dessert coffee because desserts are sweet and coffee isn't: you made a mistake by suggesting that the word "dessert" carries a meaning it doesn't. The misunderstanding of the word is yours, not the dictionary's.
I was questioned by a local lady once about why I didn't call her when I was in town on business. I decided to try a new SP, and didn't need to give her a reference. I received an email about a week later to the effect of "how dare you not call me and see someone else..." So, yes, they must keep and compare notes. How else would she have known?
Last edited:
Super unprofessional and it seems she not only is making you not want to see her again or the one who divulged that you had visited her.
To reply to the OP, yes SP's are like Santa keeping notes on who has been naughty and who has been nice.
LOL with a headcase like that I don't think she giving anything back. More like the jealous girl who taunts you like "Yeah, you want it? You fucking want it? Too bad, go back on LL and find that other whore you got with" With all due respect; If we only had one gal we wouldn't need this forum or recommendations, but THIS IS A HOBBY We like the sport, but exchange the equipment as time goes on.. as with any other hobby, fucking baseball even LOL not saying the ladies gone down-hill or nothing (I mean look at Erica Phoenix, mature, gorgeous face, older than I'd prefer but she's got the talent and that really is the only important thing to consider when your going down that particular avenue, btw Erica if your reading this please take note that I LOVE YA, lol fangirl ^_^) We like variety! We try things new, say like we're at some icecream place and you ALWAYS order chocolate but maybe one day you want vanilla, then strawberry, then before you know it you're trying Chocolate-Mint, Neopolitan, Cotton-candy, your taste wanders! It expands, not just the girl but the experience as well..
I was an SP, 2 years ago I was on CL, nothing classy or fancy just trying to get by... I'd have to have a second opinion from my sister who lived with me at the time to consider whether I answered/texted back, and if was too little too late (came over, deed was done) whether I wanted to see that particular person again or not.. Like fuck I could go on and on and on and on about the measures that independents (which I was) have to take to screen clients, BUT ALSO consider having them over again or not..
There's my two cents *cling* right in the hat
Unless your a member of theblacklist you can't find any info on other clientele but it is really useful (when it used to be a free quick search) it'd display the name that they said (or if unsaid it'd be unknown with the number they used, ain't no one's got time for blocked or private calls), their handles, following the details of the offense which ranges widely from a no-show to woman beating piece of shit, And that boys, is a wide spectrum (from rip-off artist to extortion) Even if you want to view the list you can't because you need some subscription, or even to report - yet again there's Twitter for the pro's but.. they're pros... Lol
Years ago, there was another locally focused escort review forum which featured a ladies only lounge. I recall seeing a lady back then who was considered one of the most reputable SPs in Vancouver. As our session was winding down, she asked if I was okay with her mentioning me on the "white list" featured in that lounge. Of course, I said absolutely.
A few years later, I had actually forgotten about that when I contacted another local, very well respected and reputable SP, who normally asks for references. Somehow the topic of references and the fact that she didn't require any from me came up during our session and she reluctantly admitted to me that she recalled that previous post from that other SP about me on that "white list."
I also remember hearing that when erslist had that social media style members profile pages, ladies had a feature by which they could rate the client members and view those ratings from other ladies. Unfortunately, I also heard stories about certain advertisers abusing that system by giving poor feedback to client members with whom they had never actually been in contact let alone seen for a session supposedly because they didn't like some of those members' posts in the forum on that site.
Anyway, I don't know if there are currently any similar venues in place for SPs but it wouldn't surprise me if there were.
A few years later, I had actually forgotten about that when I contacted another local, very well respected and reputable SP, who normally asks for references. Somehow the topic of references and the fact that she didn't require any from me came up during our session and she reluctantly admitted to me that she recalled that previous post from that other SP about me on that "white list."
I also remember hearing that when erslist had that social media style members profile pages, ladies had a feature by which they could rate the client members and view those ratings from other ladies. Unfortunately, I also heard stories about certain advertisers abusing that system by giving poor feedback to client members with whom they had never actually been in contact let alone seen for a session supposedly because they didn't like some of those members' posts in the forum on that site.
Anyway, I don't know if there are currently any similar venues in place for SPs but it wouldn't surprise me if there were.
