Do a lot of people go BB on civvy pickups?

[lenny]

"in the last Now magazine sex survey some 51% said fuck condoms"

https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?434922-Do-a-lot-of-people-go-BB-on-civvy-pickups

 

[sbill]

It's probably risky enough doing in the back of a moving pickup, let alone bareback!

 

[VanessaofBC]

"in the last Now magazine sex survey some 51% said fuck condoms"

https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?434922-Do-a-lot-of-people-go-BB-on-civvy-pickups

who are more likely to want BB - older clients....lets say 35 +

or younger than 35.

That is what I am interested in knowing.

And FYI...I Just do not want any babies....eeek...that is reason alone to scare me into using protection.

Imagine being "trapped" into being some crazy b*tches baby daddy!?!?!?! You want Baby Momma drama???? I am starting to think you do.

 

[badbadboy]

"in the last Now magazine sex survey some 51% said fuck condoms"

https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?434922-Do-a-lot-of-people-go-BB-on-civvy-pickups

N E V E R

Get with this century and wrap it up.

 

[lenny]

who are more likely to want BB - older clients....lets say 35 +

or younger than 35.

That is what I am interested in knowing.

The under 35 group would include a large number of under 13's who have no interest in sex of any kind. Basicly anyone else who is not mentally challenged wants BB.

And FYI...I Just do not want any babies....eeek...that is reason alone to scare me into using protection.

Condoms only provide so-so protection against pregnancy...& therefore STIs also...so hopefully you are using more than just condoms to protect you. 15% of couples get a baby every year using condoms, so that speaks to how average they are at protecting women against STI's as well. Moreover for SP's the rate may be even worse, since they have way more sex than couples do.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condom

Imagine being "trapped" into being some crazy b*tches baby daddy!?!?!?! You want Baby Momma drama???? I am starting to think you do.

I'd no more want to hand over my bankroll to her kid than flush it. But practicing coitus interuptus perfectly is a far better protection against pregnancy than typical condom use. Moreover, i prefer SP's who use some form of birth control like the pill. Combine those two methods and there is virtually no chance of a pregnancy occuring, even if we're both fertile.

 

[lenny]

Let's just say that I accidentally impregnated an SP (and we were able to determine my paternity). Wouldn't she come after me for child support?

Possibly. Paternity could be determined after birth, if she knows who you are, where to find you, & can make you take the test. But in Canada she would probably have had a legal abortion long before then. If it happened in Thailand abortion would be less likely to occur, though the required amounts for child support may be substantially less. So i'd suggest being anonymous with SP's, see proof they are using BC, or don't cum inside them (with or without a condom). Also be sure she doesn't take your sperm somewhere out of your sight and do god knows what with it.

 

[VanessaofBC]

I'd no more want to hand over my bankroll to her kid than flush it. But practicing coitus interuptus perfectly is a far better protection against pregnancy than typical condom use. Moreover, i prefer SP's who use some form of birth control like the pill. Combine those two methods and there is virtually no chance of a pregnancy occuring, even if we're both fertile.

ound:

Can't wait to see you on Maury Povich!!!!

EDIT: No client has ever asked me if I was on the pill...how do you even ask a lady that?

 

[VanessaofBC]

Condoms only provide so-so protection against pregnancy...& therefore STIs also...so hopefully you are using more than just condoms to protect you. 15% of couples get a baby every year using condoms, so that speaks to how average they are at protecting women against STI's as well. Moreover for SP's the rate may be even worse, since they have way more sex than couples do.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condom


.

I always click on Talk, to see what poeple REALLY think of the wiki article....

"Effectiveness study results

Consider the following sentence, occurring under the header Effectiveness: The typical use pregnancy rate among condom users varies depending on the population being studied,that is how you were born the condom broke, ranging from 10–18% per year.[46] The perfect use pregnancy rate of condoms is 2% per year. I think the meaning of the phrase 'x% per year' is unclear here. Condom failure would be just a percentage IMO, e.g. 2 out of 100 times = 2%. The 'per year' part is either redundant or not well explained. Unfortunately I couldn't retrieve the original study. I suggest using this source: http://www.americanpregnancy.org/preventingpregnancy/malecondom.html. This source indicates a typical use failure rate of 14-15% and an effectiveness of over 95% with perfect use"


SOURCE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Condom

 

[PlayfulAlex]

snip...Lenny, I am starting to think you have a one track mind.

Oh my goodness, haymitch, are you just starting to notice? ound:

 

[VanessaofBC]

Yeah I would be up for that- why not?

I am on my second IUD and love it. till I get my tubes tied this is what works for me

.

Wow, you are so brave. I am on the no kids bandwagon too!!!

As for your acquaintance, I am sorry to hear about the situation, for the children's sake of course.

 

[blazejowski]

Lenny, I am starting to think you have a one track mind.

Oh my goodness, haymitch, are you just starting to notice? ound:

Hah!! Lenny is to BBFS as Sperminator is to donairs/shoes as BJHunter is to sucking cock/bashing the Canucks

 

[Unpossible]

I just use an empty Doritos bag and elastic band.

 

[lenny]

Hi Tim,

I would have to say why should anyone need to be forced to pay child support? Child support is an obligation of the parent to their child, not the other parent. Whatever your or my or lenny's relationship might be to a mother, be it long -term, paid or a one night hook-up, the child is owed the support of both of its parents. One can choose to fight over support to the mother (or not), but there should be no thought of not meeting one's obligation to their child.

Let's look at this rationally and logicly.

Suppose i accidently impregnated a Vancouver SP & she carried it to birth. And this child was one i never wanted. I have no feelings for it any more than any other child on earth. Why should i? In fact i have more feelings for & feel more obligation to other people's children in poor countries where they are starving & do not have the Canadian welfare state to take care of them. I'd feel more obligation to children of SP's i see in 3rd world Thailand, children which are not mine, than i would to my child with the SP in welfare state Canada.

My child would be a product of two people, so i suppose it could be said it's biologicly 50% mine and 50% hers. Compare that to one of my BMs which is biologicly 100% mine. Just because something is biologicly mine, does not necessarily mean i have any moral, emotional or financial obligations to it. Although in the case of the child, as opposed to my latest piss in the toilet, it has needs. But so do millions of poor, starving or homeless children on earth. So why should the biologicly 50% (accidental unwanted) lenny baby get special treatment over other non lenny children who have greater needs? The greater obligation, if there is any at all, should be where there is the greater need, not based on biology. Besides, BTW, if we go back far enough in history, are not all humans related biologicly?

Canadian law obligates me legally to support my 50% biological (unwanted accidental) Canadian born child financially. Take that away and i have no obligations to the child in any way, whether morally, emotionally or financially. After all, she (the SP) is the one who chose to keep the child, not me. I might have more feelings for my dog that has lived with me for 10 years, or a starving homeless crying kitten.

 

[lenny]

Ah yes, as practised by Mr. and Mrs. Rhythm, the Catholic couple down the block with 9 kids.

These Catholics seem to think practicing coitus interruptus is a "mortal sin".

http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?p=4531815

Here's a straight up question Lenny, seriously, I’m not trying to flame or troll you.

I think you are & generally ignore such posts.

 

[lenny]

ound:

Can't wait to see you on Maury Povich!!!!

EDIT: No client has ever asked me if I was on the pill...how do you even ask a lady that?

Maury who?

I just ask. Had an SP with me at the hospital in Bangkok the other day for a 3 month BC shot (Depo-Provera), since if you only ask the answer may not be the truth. So i prefer proof, as in being there when the shot is injected, or a medical document stating tubes were tied, etc. Even receipts for or packages of BC pills would be better than nothing. It's like paying for insurance against 18 years of support payments. 18 X 12 X 1000 = $270,000 (+ interest). I think the DP shot price was about 300 baht or $10 USD.

 

[lenny]

I always click on Talk, to see what poeple REALLY think of the wiki article....

"Effectiveness study results

Consider the following sentence, occurring under the header Effectiveness: The typical use pregnancy rate among condom users varies depending on the population being studied,that is how you were born the condom broke, ranging from 10–18% per year.[46] The perfect use pregnancy rate of condoms is 2% per year. I think the meaning of the phrase 'x% per year' is unclear here. Condom failure would be just a percentage IMO, e.g. 2 out of 100 times = 2%. The 'per year' part is either redundant or not well explained. Unfortunately I couldn't retrieve the original study. I suggest using this source: http://www.americanpregnancy.org/preventingpregnancy/malecondom.html. This source indicates a typical use failure rate of 14-15% and an effectiveness of over 95% with perfect use"


SOURCE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Condom

Sometimes i read the "Talk" sections, too, as they provide more info & insights. Though i'm not sure what your point is with this particular quote. And what gets added to the article itself is considered "la crème de la crème", whereas the Talk section is often full of discussions showing how they reached the conclusions that are in the article itself.

 

[lenny]

@lenny Thanks Lenny. I mean, since I mostly see girls at Carman Fox, if (and I'm just using this as an example) I accidentally impregnated her, I guess I have the feeling that they can and will find me. As we all know, condoms aren't 100% foolproof.

I too have heard about the "take the condom, and inseminate herself later without his knowledge." I USED to think, "I'm not handsome, I'm not rich, why would she pick ME, of all guys she's seen," but I need to realize that that isn't neccessarily the case.

You should be ok, Tim. The chances of a pregnancy occurring with a SP, with us guys using BC methods of one form or another, and the many SP's (especially in Canada) who also use additional methods, is quite remote, i think.

Personally i am not inclined to get snipped, but have looked into being tested to see if i am even capable of making a baby. BC Health care will have a guys' sperm tested for potency, as i received a walk in clinic referral to the places where they also take blood samples for STI testing. If found infertile it would give me some piece of mind, but i haven't got around to being tested yet.

In Thailand I've had a couple gals i BBed claim or "think" they were pregnant. One even acted confident i was the father, since according to her i was the only one she did BB with. I spoke to her re pregnancy chances with condoms & other stuff. As is often the case these girls are full of bollocks, there's no baby, just a flat stomach months later, & they're only looking for a guy to hand over free cash donations while they live the easy life & joke about the stupid farang to all their friends. Most of them have BFs they are doing BB, besides their many customers that bang them, with or w/o a plastic baggie.

 

[VanessaofBC]

You feel no moral, emotional or financial obligations to your own BMs??

:faint:

Hope you're having a great trip lenny.

I think the courts may agree. As mentioned

Yes, she would. There's no reason for her not to, raising a kid is expensive and depending on your income, she can get quite a lot of money from you. Yes, you would be liable. Yes you would pay, if you didn't want the government to garnish your wages, prevent you from getting a driver's licence and generally making your life hell. The FMEP has some teeth now. I know a woman who was able to not have to work at all because a very rich guy impregnated her, on a one night stand no less, she got to have the kid she always wanted and makes more than enough to live on - tax free mind you, from his child support. Always wear a rubber.

And lenny....

Let's look at this rationally and logically.

Compare that to one of my BMs which is biologicly 100% mine. Just because something is biologicly mine, does not necessarily mean i have any moral, emotional or financial obligations to it. .

Babe, that makes you sound cold. Just heartless and cold that you feel no responsibility to your own seed. What did your mom do to you that you be so cold to abandon a small life?

You need to see this

I WISH the shoe was on the other foot, but it is not. Unfortunately WE (as females) have to carry the burden, pun intended.

 

[PlayfulAlex]

I guess your dad didn't account for the possibility that one of your bros could be gay?

I don't understand your confusion...Dad was clearly talking about pregnancy and unwanted children, not sexual predisposition!

 

[PlayfulAlex]

I think he doesn't know where he is alex. Its an escort review board and 267 posts with not one review, he must be very confused:thumb:

Maybe he's confused about his sexuality too

Kisses Melina*

I saw her again but she had gained some weight, had been smoking recently, had a more businesslike, non-erotic manner, and was restrictive not just with kissing, but with several other very simple and harmless requests (e.g. about saying erotic things). But she is a friendly person, and I think you could expect a pleasant hour.

I would hope one could expect more from her than simply pleasant company though?

Oh really? He's not one to shy away from commenting on the reviews that others post. Maybe he's just working on a few of his own reviews now... :nod: