I also believe that if you see a girl once and don't like her, then move on! Yes that is the chance that you make and the money that you spent but not all of us are ugly and we do great jobs on you and for you!!!LOL
Disappointed
- Thread starter Ripped
- Start date
I think the most important thing is "was the service as good as you had hoped?" I think all girls are gorgeous when they have their lips wrapped around my cock.
Personally, I don't see any difference in whether an SP e-mails or PM's a picture with her full face and whether it appears on the net. Once it is in someone's hands that they've never met it might as well be everywhere. According to recent research reported recently in the Globe and Mail, 1 in 20 people are "sociopaths" with no conscience. Eventually, an SP will run into someone who distributes her pictures without thought of the possible consequences. We on Perb have our own little band of SP haters (actually just women haters) who crop up like festering boils from time to time and if I were in the SP business, I would fear that one of these loony-tunes would mis-use my pictures.
If I were an SP concerned about keeping my identity private, I would never e-mail or PM pictures. I can understand that the smartest SP's (and most discrete) SP's will guard their privacy closely and that means my privacy will get the same treatment. For that reason, when selecting an SP, I choose to take the slight chance that someone's face I've only got a glimpse of isn't hideous.
Most of the photography I've seen from people like Derek, etc. shows enough of the face so that you can tell 95% of what you are getting. The starbursts and blurred eyes are enough to hide the identity but you have to be blind or an idiot not to be able to tell that you are getting a beauty or a face like an old shoe.
In the case of Dea and Szabina, I took a chance with both of them based on partial photography. They both exceeded my expectations by a long shot and, you know what, I kind of liked the mysterious part when I walked in the door, too. I'll never forget the thrill of the first time with either of them.
I'd never demand that an SP e-mail her pictures -- most of the reviews will tell me enough and the partial photos are all I need to seal the deal.
If I were an SP concerned about keeping my identity private, I would never e-mail or PM pictures. I can understand that the smartest SP's (and most discrete) SP's will guard their privacy closely and that means my privacy will get the same treatment. For that reason, when selecting an SP, I choose to take the slight chance that someone's face I've only got a glimpse of isn't hideous.
Most of the photography I've seen from people like Derek, etc. shows enough of the face so that you can tell 95% of what you are getting. The starbursts and blurred eyes are enough to hide the identity but you have to be blind or an idiot not to be able to tell that you are getting a beauty or a face like an old shoe.
In the case of Dea and Szabina, I took a chance with both of them based on partial photography. They both exceeded my expectations by a long shot and, you know what, I kind of liked the mysterious part when I walked in the door, too. I'll never forget the thrill of the first time with either of them.
I'd never demand that an SP e-mail her pictures -- most of the reviews will tell me enough and the partial photos are all I need to seal the deal.
DeaAphrodite said:
Dea,
I know you are a sweetie, and still hope we meet up.
This is nothing personal against any SP.
And what you wrote here that I quoted is great advice.
But still no man can see every good SP in the world.
So lets say a person logically eliminates people from the list of must see's.
bad reviews, no pics, limited services etc. all add up to get the list to a useable size.
Plus when i am home i generally only see one gal...she is truly wonderful, and i do not need another SP when home.
But i travel a LOT and so i like to experiment out of town.
Best SP's I have ever seen excluding my regular, are 2 SW's and 3 gals i saw in Mexico.
Its hard for us guys as we have too many choices, and often use the little head to make decisions.
All i am saying is that from now on no gal without full pics will be added to my must see list is all.
And even using that criteria, the list grows to fast
You nailed it, Luther. That earlier post by Gentleman First saying an SP e-mailed him some pics but she had nothing on the net was forgetting the obvious: she only has to send those "private pics" to one indiscreet person and then she DOES have pics on the net, whether she likes it or not. Though we may be prone to think of these women as 24/7 fantasies, this is what they do, not who they are and they have lives outside the biz. Many of the ladies do not want to take the chance of a relative, friend, employer, whatever coming across their pics online and discovering their "other life". If not showing their face in pics is their way of safeguarding against that possibility, that's their prerogative. I certainly wouldn't decide against seeing someone based on them having made that choice. But to each his/her own. The fact we aren't all exactly alike is what keeps things from becoming totally uninteresting and dull.LutherBlissett said:
I believe in seeing girls who have had several positive reviews as there is usually enough information on which to make an informed decision. Just because her advertised pics hace the face blanked out does not make a lady less appealing to me. Quite the opposite, I like a bit of fantasy. I also respect a girl's desire to privacy. As stated elsewhere here, if you're not impressed at first sight, guys, just turn around and walk out.
Expecting someone to send naked pictures of herself to someone she only knows from an email is unreasonable. One girl told me it's just guys gathering material for their fantasies, and it was a big waste of her time. A lot of guys on perb may be trustworthy but there are a lot of goofs too.JustAGuy said:
I can definitely see the ladies' side of this!
Your point seems to be that some Reviews are incorrect and oversells SP's. I've also been a lurker and would like to trust the reviews as being accurate so I too won't waste my time and money.Ripped said:A few months ago I tried a SP on my own without checking first, she was just okay IMHO, then I came over to the board out of curiousity to search for reviews. She was reviewed fairly well, to my surprise, I figure, okay so people here have different tastes.
Anyway so I have the itch to try someone new recently, checked the reviews on this SP which seemed to be very high.
All I can say is ... hideous
Any suggestions on an SP who is truly a quality act? For my first, I prefer someone who is quiet and sweet but also passionate when it counts. Tall and thin without a hard edge
I think you just have to do a bit more checking, on your own, maybe read the reviews written by a particular poster/client to see what their tastes and budget are.LeBeau said:
I know that after looking at some of the SP's advertising here, that there are some pretty hot looking girls.
May I suggest, politely, that this query would be better placed in a 411 thread? Thanks.LeBeau said:
