Asian Fever

Digital Camera - any recomendations

pooner144

Member
Aug 24, 2004
229
0
16
G'Day all, I'm buying a digital camera today, I don't want to spend more than $349, want something in the 5 Mega Pixel range. Easy to use, and small. One of the big things is that I don't want to have to use "AA" Battereis. I'd like it to have a cradle or something similar for charging. So far this is what I've been sold on so far.

Kodak EasyShare V550

Does anybody have any advice or other recomendations?
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
4,977
891
113
Upstairs
I was going to suggest one that takes AA batteries. Why the bias? The big advantage is you can get them anywhere and they are relatively cheap. Nothing worse than losing power and there is no place that sells your specific battery. Them you are truly SOL. I'd suggest a Canon - they are slightly ahead of the curve of all the other manufacturers.
 

pooner144

Member
Aug 24, 2004
229
0
16
The reason why I don't like using standard batteries is because I have a 1.2 MP digital camera right now (it's an HP) bought it bought 4 years ago for 300 bucks. It takes 4 "AA"'s and it runs out of batteries pretty quick, I feel like I'm always buying batteries everytime I use it.
 

maverick73

Banned
Feb 2, 2005
2,289
0
0
Spinnerville, BC
pooner144 said:
The reason why I don't like using standard batteries is because I have a 1.2 MP digital camera right now (it's an HP) bought it bought 4 years ago for 300 bucks. It takes 4 "AA"'s and it runs out of batteries pretty quick, I feel like I'm always buying batteries everytime I use it.
I would recommend getting rechargeables... they last almost as long as reg. batteries these days and with stuff that can be left on by accident, rechargeables can save u a pile of money (doesn't it suck to leave something on and it drains your new $7 set of batteries?). I'm not usually a fan of other size of rechargeables, but in AA, rechargeables is pretty much all I use... I got a whole stack load... the energizer 2500 mAh ones are long lasting and hard to beat.
 

missionary

New member
Sep 25, 2004
48
0
0
www.sweet-shots.com
Why Not AA batteries

:confused: I would have to say the same as Cock Throppled, and why the bias against AA batteries. You can carry spares, buy them anywhere and get cheap re-chargeables. An extra battery for my camera is over $100......

Personally I prefer Canon.
 

hitrack

I'LL KILL YA ALL!!
Feb 25, 2003
3,881
0
0
Surrey
I agree with dpreview. Takes a long time to read reviews and hit the stores to look for one. Also take a boo at pbase.com, you can do searches for specific camera models ans see what other peoples pics turn out like.

I agree with gettin a 30min energizer charger and some of the 2500mha energizer batts. I have those in all my high drain gear that uses AA batts. The kick ass. IMO having a proprietary battery has the major disadvantage of having to buy another $50+- battery and it only works with the camera.
 

gravitas

New member
Feb 7, 2006
2,174
0
0
pooner144 said:
The reason why I don't like using standard batteries is because I have a 1.2 MP digital camera right now (it's an HP) bought it bought 4 years ago for 300 bucks. It takes 4 "AA"'s and it runs out of batteries pretty quick, I feel like I'm always buying batteries everytime I use it.
I have mixed feelings on the AA vs. proprietary battery route. I also have an HP thats about 4 years old powered by AA and IMO its a piece of shit but its useful for its intended purpose. I bought it as a low end camera to keep in the truck just incase I saw something that was pic worthy (tities and the like), was involved in/witnessed an accident, etc. For that purpose the AA btys work well cause the cameras not getting much use. If your camera is going to be used for longer periods (i.e. a full day at the beach, disneyland, hiking) then you're better off with a dedicated battery that in modern cameras is an efficient technology like LI or NiMH.

Docking stations for cameras are IMO a waste of money and space. Last thing I want on my desk is another piece of electronic shit that needs a power adapter or USB cable. If you have a desktop get an internal 5 1/4" or 3 1/2" universal card reader. If you have a notebook get a PCMCIA universal card reader. Or, better yet buy a camera (like the SD-400) which has a USB Mini B connector (not some other fucking connector that forces you to buy additional single use cables....and yes I'm bitter....fucking kodak and pentax cameras) and pull it out when ever you want to synch.
 

Maury Beniowski

Blastocyst
Mar 31, 2004
1,869
1
0
In a nice wet pussy!

pooner144

Member
Aug 24, 2004
229
0
16
Man, this reminds me of about 15 or so years ago when it came to trying to buy a VCR.... so many choices, so many prices, so little time.

Thanks for the costco link.... That looks good. I've seriously thought about a Cannon as well. I like them too. Thanks for all the imput, I'll let you know what I ended up with.
 

Randy Whorewald

Orgasm donor
Sep 20, 2005
3,325
0
0
Greek Islands
www.randydyck.com
I agree the Canon SD 400 is one of the better ones in your price range. I'd go through Steve's Digicams website for additional resaerch:

http://www.steves-digicams.com/
 

Lurker 123

High Maintenance Member
Jul 23, 2003
1,059
1
38
Somewhere in BC
pooner144 said:
G'Day all, I'm buying a digital camera today, I don't want to spend more than $349, want something in the 5 Mega Pixel range. Easy to use, and small. One of the big things is that I don't want to have to use "AA" Battereis. I'd like it to have a cradle or something similar for charging. So far this is what I've been sold on so far.

Kodak EasyShare V550

Does anybody have any advice or other recomendations?
I believe you have mis-calculated your budget. After you have pruchased this camera,you have to spend at least another $50-60 to buy a 256 mb memmory card and another $60 to buy a charger and re-chargable batteries plus GST. So the total cost is way beyond your budget.(over $120).

So before you buy a digital camera,you have to put all those extra gadgets into account. Usually it will cost you around an extra $130 and up!:eek: Gadgets include memmory card ,battery and charger and camera case!:eek:

Good luck!
 

Lurker 123

High Maintenance Member
Jul 23, 2003
1,059
1
38
Somewhere in BC
pooner144 said:
The reason why I don't like using standard batteries is because I have a 1.2 MP digital camera right now (it's an HP) bought it bought 4 years ago for 300 bucks. It takes 4 "AA"'s and it runs out of batteries pretty quick, I feel like I'm always buying batteries everytime I use it.
There are many newly designed rechargeable AA battery for camera.Each recharge can take over 200 pictures with flash. If you have read your camera menu carefully ,AA batteries( no matter alkaline or any kind) are not recommended . i.e,for a pair Duracell alkaline AA battery,my camera could only take 24 or less pictures with flash .Whereas a pair of special rechargeable battery for digital camera could take 212 pictures with my camera!:eek:
 

Chet

Banned
Mar 13, 2006
31
1
0
Battery wise, I personally suggest ones that use specially designed slim batteries... they do last longer and less hassle to carry.
Expensive? No. Look around eBay, I can get mine for less than $20(I have 2 extras). Not to mention that those batteries get recharged much faster as well as much longer life span.

I suggest that you consider your main usage purposes.
There're so many aspects to think about if you really want to get what suits you. Here's some of my personal tips:

1) DON'T BE TOO CONCERNED ABOUT THE SIZE OF MEGA-PIXELS
It's not just the MegaPixels that makes a good camera. It's the whole mechanism that matters -including flash, size of CCD, Firmware, Lense etc... That's why those brand-name low MP cameras take better quality pix than chinese-noname high MP cameras.

2)PICTURE / MOVIES
I love taking movies as much as pictures. Some cameras only offer 30sec maximum regardless of memory size. But some let you take movie as long as the memory lasts. FPS matters too. Some only offer 16 Frames Per Second, but some offers 32 FPS which gives you almost camcorder quality movies.

3)RESPONSE TIME MATTERS BIG TIME
If you're looking forward to carry it around alot and take pictures at the right moments quickly, look for the one with fast response time... For example, some camera takes so long to get turned on... by the time it's ready.. you missed the right moment. This is not a big deal if you're only going to use it when things are all posed and smiling at you waiting generously.

4)LOOK FOR OPTICAL ZOOM, NOT DIGITAL ZOOM.
For example... If you look at that Kodac in above post, it's advertized as 15x zoom, but if you read the detail the optical zoom is only 3x. Digital zoom eats off the picture quality so it's better not to use it unless you really want to see something from far (just get a binocular!). Optical zoom is the real lense-zoom that will give you the same high quality pictures.

5)CHECK THE CCD(Charge Coupled Device) SIZE.
CCD is one that absorbs the light and records the image(think of it as the film in film camera). Smaller the CCD is, harder to take stable pictures. This can be really annoying especially when you're taking indoor shots. It's really a compromising to use compact size cameras opposed to big ones because the size of CCD is limited. However, 'Big camera' doesn't always mean 'Big CCD.' For example.... CCD size of Nikon D1(Only 2.6MegaPixel) is 23.7 x 15.6mm, and the most of the 3.3Mega Pixel cameras have CCD size of 5.52mm x 4.14mm. This is a huge difference and Nikon D1 is more expensive.

6)OTHERS
LCD size and type(Some have rotating LCD which is very very convenient, especially when you're taking self-shot), ISO and Lighting mode choices, Functions(eg:Some offer automatic stablizing that corrects shaky pix)... etc..

Well.. I'm writing an essay here... Hope this helped.. I do suggest that you study quite a bit if you don't want to regret.. unless you're as rich as pooners.. :)

Don't just go to a Future Shop and buy... If you look around online there're tons of more selections of excellent quality cameras that you've probably never even seen... Look at mine for example... http://www.classiccameraexchange.com/mediac/400_0/media/Contax~SL300RT.jpg
http://karkun.com/contax/SL300ti0421.jpg
http://www.dixis.ru/prod_foto/contax_sl300r.jpg
Prices are much better too... eBay or Bizrate for example.. Worried about warranty hassles of online shopping? It's very unlikely for a brand-new name-brand electronics to go wrong during the warranty time anyways(I find... maybe except Sony)... and price difference is alot...
 
Last edited:

Sonny

Senior Member
Sep 12, 2004
3,734
220
63
thank you, Chet!

I've been thinking of getting a digital camera, and your essay has helped a lot to understand some of the important features. I'm a Canon SLR guy and therefore am oriented to getting a digital SLR. Any suggestions as to best overall digital SLR camera without getting too crazy in money?
 
Vancouver Escorts