Diamonds mgmt. will NOT respond to thread because they know all of us experienced pooners are correct. The industry, the way they operate it, is finished! They may reply, please PM us for more details. LOL!! Nothing like being transparent. They feel they have to hide their garbage in the trash can.
Diamonds
- Thread starter spinnerman2
- Start date
To be fair Kris1972, the lack of response on the part of Diamonds Mgmt. is likely, as Rexx said, due to them not being a paid advertiser.
Several months ago in the midst of a bit of a shit storm where a local SP was, under the guise of defending herself, lambasting guys who negatively reviewed her, the Mods made it very clear that unless one is a paid advertiser, they are NOT to comment on threads discussing them nor make any mention of their services or rates here on PERB. Violators would be immediately banned.
Thus Diamond's Mgmt. cannot come on this thread except to speak very generically about themselves unless they wan to get banned.
Hey, I was also a bit critical until Rexx reminded me but it is what it is.
Cheers
But who wouldn't be a paid sponsor? This is a site FOR WHAT YOU ARE SELLING DIAMONDS!!!!! Why cheap out and not be a sponsor. Really, how much of your revenue could come from here if you did it right.
Like I said, had I known how I could have purchased and kept the license, I would have bought the place and ran it from a distance like a real business runs. Marketed, proper app for members that would give them booking ability as well as the ability to see who is working. Would be so easy to put in a proper security system that didn't record, but would be enough to spot John Law and before opening the door you could easily hit a button to blink some lights, or even page with a code so that the proper clothes are on.
Another idea? Hire someone for minimum wage to clean the rooms and do laundry instead of the girls having to do it.
Duh.....always found that so stupid at Nevada's.
Had a ton of other ideas, but without the license, place would be worthless.
Like I said, had I known how I could have purchased and kept the license, I would have bought the place and ran it from a distance like a real business runs. Marketed, proper app for members that would give them booking ability as well as the ability to see who is working. Would be so easy to put in a proper security system that didn't record, but would be enough to spot John Law and before opening the door you could easily hit a button to blink some lights, or even page with a code so that the proper clothes are on.
Another idea? Hire someone for minimum wage to clean the rooms and do laundry instead of the girls having to do it.
Duh.....always found that so stupid at Nevada's.
Had a ton of other ideas, but without the license, place would be worthless.
Its a lame excuse be an advertiser and respond as for the industry being what it is . what it is , is not good enough .
I have just seen diamonds add on kingdome 99 looking for sp's . if this is the problem why not just raise the price to attract more sp's I would pay more for a place both safe for the sp's and the clients . would other client feel the same
For me the most important issue is quality, not quantity. Unfortunately Diamonds has to draw on the same small poor talent pool in Winnipeg that eventually hurt Nevada. I doubt paying the ladies more will change this, if a woman does not want to risk being caught working in her home town you can't pay her enough. As well the Internet changed everything, the ladies can charge more, keep more, set their own hours and be their own bosses thanks to BP, Perb, and other sites e.g; Kerry and Mandy were some of the first high-quality locals to move from Nevada to the Internet, and they said they loved it. A lady of quality would now likely choose to work independently rather than spend time sitting and waiting in the backroom of Diamonds with some unsavoury women whom they would normally avoid.
You sound more like an sp then client the problem with the internet is the law has changed . and now is riskier for the client . it has little to do with the pool of talent but more to do with making a safe ( from the law ) for the cleint . would pay more if it was safer . and after that we could talk about talent pool . This is were diamonds comes in it is now safer in a place like that then phoning a number on the net . LE could easy put up a fake add . It just seems to me you can not afford or will not pay for a safe environment for both clients and sp . Were I am willing too I believe this place could make a good profit of clients like me . and am suggesting a way forward for them
Personally I feel safer with the Internet than MPs, that's just me. City MPs have been all been busted at one time or another. Anybody remember the police armed stand-off with a client at Club 205 at Logan and Main way back when, which then closed? Unsafe. I've never had a LE encounter with the Internet.
But for me the major issue was the selection of ladies at Nevada was usually quite poor, something other posters have alluded to about Diamonds on this thread - issues of reliability, appearance, D&D, service and so on. Diamonds may have an insurmountable HR problem.
Most of the visiting ladies have several reliable reviews on the Net somewhere, and I have a long enough list of my own of reliable visitors I have seen before to keep me very safe.
You are correct about this.
I know from talking to ladies who started in the MP business that probably 75% of the ladies working at MP's are there because the can't keep a "real" job and or they think this is easy money. Managing and motivating people who are not in a job for the right reasons is very difficult.
I recognize that Diamonds is trying hard, and everyone would like to see it work. But because of the impoverished talent pool Diamonds must draw from I think the risk:reward ratio is too high. A better risk for your money is the visiting ladies. Better still if they are well reviewed. The k-girl agencies are also a pretty good bet.
Even if a Diamonds lady is well-reviewed there is good chance she is not on duty when you arrive.
There's really no need to pay money to a middle man for a surprise attendant. I'd rather peruse BP.
Very good point, HGR.
Jenny wasn't my first choice. But she was the lady at the desk when I arrived.
When I called, the person at the desk listed off 5 names that she assured me were all present and available. When I arrived, I was told 2 didn't show up and requested that I choose from one of the three available ladies.
This has happened to me over and over.
I wish they wouldn't do that. I am paying for a certain standard of services
In my opinion, Diamonds is shooting themselves in the foot, by listing staff that aren't present.
Jenny wasn't my first choice. But she was the lady at the desk when I arrived.
When I called, the person at the desk listed off 5 names that she assured me were all present and available. When I arrived, I was told 2 didn't show up and requested that I choose from one of the three available ladies.
This has happened to me over and over.
I wish they wouldn't do that. I am paying for a certain standard of services
In my opinion, Diamonds is shooting themselves in the foot, by listing staff that aren't present.
Diamond's (or Nevada's as previously called) is "the minor league farm team" of the pooning industry in Winnipeg. They have produced a few indy gems such as Emily (now moved away), just as Club 222 did 25 years ago when Oshean came on the scene. I haven't gone there for years now, just because of the risks involved (L.E. surveillance, parking in that neighborhood, etc.)..... and the fact that I prefer outcalls. Just MHO.... I think the choices are greater, with local and touring SPs. We are in a great geographical location with great choices for established ladies to choose from.
