Another issue in research is dealing with the gatekeepers. In order to get published one has to follow the status quo. Don't throw rocks, etc.One of my closet interests (aside from weird sexy shit), is patching together nuggets from various disciplines to better understand how the mind works, and how we can be conscious and self-aware.
There is tons of neuroscience research that tell us about synapses, brain region functions, etc. Yet the binary-computer brain model falls short for me. There’s gotta be more at play than mbps to achieve consciousness. The multidisciplinary Cognitive Sciences approach hasn’t broken through to the bigger understanding of mind and consciousness yet. At least there’s an attempt, but the 6 disciplines are all kind of mired in their own baggage, and collaboration does not guarantee cognition if they are not asking the right questions, looking under the right rocks, and cross-functionally innovating their research methods and hypothesis testing. I see additive activity, but we need multiplication or better.
One avenue that always perks my interest is when scientists consider the brain as an analogue field generator with binary elements, rather than a binary machine that is completely predictable.
Hmmmm, keeps my spirit alive and hopeful.
There is likely a whole other world out there of very interesting but unpublished research...