In an opinion piece in last Friday's (Dec.12'08) Vancouver Courier: "Vancouverites indifferent to plight of prostitutes", Mark Hasiuk presents some "facts" that seem questionable to me.
He claims that Vancouver hosts 65 licensed brothels (seemly referencing Vancouver City Hall, mentioning Mayor Robertson). Within Vancouver proper, I cannot name even 20 licensed establishments that might be conceivably classified as brothels. Perhaps he is encompassing the entire lower mainland?
He also alleges gang control of Vancouver's licensed brothels. That seems unlikely to me. Despite ongoing gang warfare in my part of town, there are a dearth of incidences involving licensed (or unlicensed) establishments. Even the trafficking case awhile ago ( http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=1825d66c-3605-49e0-ba3c-7cf9a22a4f6f&k=5262 ) didn't allege any gang involvement that I can remember. The only potential incident I can remember is the firebombing, many years ago, of the establishment which now houses the Fox Den. Was that crime every solved? (Was it gang intimidation? Or a morality nutcase like the firebombings of Red Hot video outlets?)
However, Mark doesn't seem very astute. He presents these problems as arguments against legalization of prostitution, not acknowledging that the objects of his diatribe present legalization as the first step in solving these exact same problems.
Any opinions? (Or, better, facts?)
He claims that Vancouver hosts 65 licensed brothels (seemly referencing Vancouver City Hall, mentioning Mayor Robertson). Within Vancouver proper, I cannot name even 20 licensed establishments that might be conceivably classified as brothels. Perhaps he is encompassing the entire lower mainland?
He also alleges gang control of Vancouver's licensed brothels. That seems unlikely to me. Despite ongoing gang warfare in my part of town, there are a dearth of incidences involving licensed (or unlicensed) establishments. Even the trafficking case awhile ago ( http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=1825d66c-3605-49e0-ba3c-7cf9a22a4f6f&k=5262 ) didn't allege any gang involvement that I can remember. The only potential incident I can remember is the firebombing, many years ago, of the establishment which now houses the Fox Den. Was that crime every solved? (Was it gang intimidation? Or a morality nutcase like the firebombings of Red Hot video outlets?)
However, Mark doesn't seem very astute. He presents these problems as arguments against legalization of prostitution, not acknowledging that the objects of his diatribe present legalization as the first step in solving these exact same problems.
Any opinions? (Or, better, facts?)