You should show up for a job interview dressed as you would show up for a work day for that company. If it's attire that requires you to hide tats/piercings (which 8 times out of 10 is geared towards the CUSTOMER's beliefs/desires not the company's or your co-workers), then showing up for the interview with your tats/piercings showing is just plain dumb. You need to know the situation you're getting into, if you cant realize that then you easily aren't really fit for the job (as you cant recognize situations and adapt, it's a universal thing).This is an interesting insight and you make a compelling argument, however I think what this thread really exposes is a lack of open-mindedness. Do you feel the same way about hiring openly gay men? What about someone who shows up to the interview with a bible in their hand? The only mistake these people are making by showing up for an interview with their tats showing is the mistake of being honest about themselves. Some people are more comfortable with their looks and the reason they don't go around hiding it is because they don't really think too much about what others. For a job interview, yes, this may be a mistake but that's maybe why they work for your company and don't own it - nobody's perfect.
I too have always had the final say in who works for me and have hired many people with tats and odd piercings. I tell them that this sort of personal decor isn't viewed positively by our customers and ask how they feel about removing the piercings and not showcasing the tats at work. Their response to this question is what does it for me. I'm not about to force my customers to change their views, but I am willing to change mine if it means hiring someone with exceptional skills who is willing to put the needs of the company/customer ahead of their own. Some of the views in this thread are just simply old-fashioned.
I asked a young friend about this subject. She's currently half way through her second degree (engineering this time) with a 3.9GPA and while she has no odd piercings or tattoos, she has many friends sporting this sort of decor and accepts them for who they are - she's at the top of her game. She felt that if a company was hiring based on looks, she wouldn't want to work there because this would probably mean the company itself wasn't as good as it looked - they probably spent more time making themselves look better than they were and she only wants to work for the cream of the crop. Interesting point. This is the generation we live in.
What happens to the employees already hired that decide to get a tattoo? Are they out of a job?
The fact is, we all have different tastes. If not, there would be no such thing as a menu in a restaurant - there'd be only one dish available and we'd all get the same.
Actually someone can make a judgement. Times are hard, when you have 50 applicants for one job, you are going to pick the one who is going to fit in the best and represent you the best. And in most high paying jobs it definitely isn't going to be the guy with tats. Hard to bring in that crucial contract when your point guy looks like some biker from the east end.I have several large tattoos, but I didn't get them to be cool or follow some trend; hell, I have been so out of touch with popular culture for about a decade and a half that I've damn near alienated myself. My tattoos are only visible when I want them to be, because I'm smart. Smart enough to know there are still old school guys like you, judging people based on appearance, and I can't wait until your old asses are phased out to make room to allow for something great.
Who the fuck am I? I'm an engineer, and it is creative minds like mine which are making innovations in technology that are changing the world as we speak. Tangible, positive changes which spread to other industries in fact. There are at least two nations' governments who trust peoples' lives with my work, so suffice it to say my tattoos speak nothing about whether I can be trusted to do a job well. And no, my career didn't just fall into my lap straight out of college, like some privileged tattooed punk kid whom you are probably picturing; I fought for a decade to get where I am. While I am no longer young enough to be considered one of the brilliant minds of the future, I will settle for being in the background knowing my tattooed hide has made its contributions to society.
Reality is, times change and you can no longer judge people based on whatever the fuck this or that meant when you were young, because a lot of that's in your head. Well, you can but you'd be a fool to do so. Get over it, just like you got used to colour television, or the cassette tape - yeah that's right, fuck your shitty 8-track player. Business has no place for those who are closed-minded, biased and stubborn to adapt to change; change which the business can benefit from. More and more, you will see Director-level positions being phased out, simply because they have overstayed their usefulness within the organization, thinking they can do the same shit for two decades without facilitating any significant growth for the business.
Imagine if you had to choose between two qualified individuals and you chose the poindexter in the suit, only to find that his/her skills are only good on paper, while the other moved on to bring their employer to success. Or maybe you're afraid of that punk being better than you were at that age. Wouldn't that be appalling?
I think the point was that is a visible demonstration of poor judgment skills. It does not mean that person is less of a human being, or that they are incompetent. But the impression is that they are impulsive and may make a bad decision sometime in the future. It is the same as coming to an interview dressed in shorts for example. If that person is covered in tatoos, the message is that person may make a whole lot of impulsive choices, and when you have a horde of candidates to select from, that probably is not the person you are going to pick. It varies from industry to industry of course, some might value that sort of person, but the vast majority of hirers will not.This is an interesting insight and you make a compelling argument, however I think what this thread really exposes is a lack of open-mindedness. Do you feel the same way about hiring openly gay men? What about someone who shows up to the interview with a bible in their hand? The only mistake these people are making by showing up for an interview with their tats showing is the mistake of being honest about themselves. Some people are more comfortable with their looks and the reason they don't go around hiding it is because they don't really think too much about what others. For a job interview, yes, this may be a mistake but that's maybe why they work for your company and don't own it - nobody's perfect.





