Well, guys, I was really stressed at work, meetings for 6.5 hours straight, not good for the prostate, though I tried to sit on my leg, twitch my legs all that. Tell me what you do during annoying meeting to keep blood flowing to the command center
1. Appearance
Anyways. Quick 15 min with Charlie.
It was not a click. At all. She looks OK, 6/10 if that, again this is subjective, face is 5-6/10, quite heavy in the mid line, medium to big size as per my standards, breast 8/10, nipples 9/10, bum 7/10. Hair nice 8-9/10 dark blonde, good
Photos extremely dated, maybe 4 years old, not fit in the waste line. She worked at SVIPS, that tells a lot, that place has a magic photoshopper photographer.
2. Intimacy
Great kisser, 9/10, eyes nice lips nice, bbbj 5/10, no deep throat, no special things to it. Massage ok, again phots are like 4 years dated as well as age is not true by quite a bit. QUITE DEEP voice.
3. Attitude was 9/10. Overall 6/10
Feels like smokes weed, behhh
Overall, for reconnaissance ok for the quality price very suboptimal.
Will not repeat.
Again confirmed my rule with two in a row that above 30 is not my plate. Above 30 is your plate if you are above 55-60 I guess, because, obviously Charlie is an interesting woman to talk to and spent some time with, fall in love and then you won't be picky about the above, especially, if you aren't too young either. So there is a niche for her, for sure, not my cup if tea though. So for the interesting communicator 10/10 hands down.
Ps
Nikki: overall weed smell in the building = much better, short notice communication 10/10, so VC is listening and improving. No deep throat should be communicated though, otherwse whats the point of bbbj 15min? Yes I know 15 min it is a lot to expect from, but no click is no click and photos faaaaar off with the reality etc see above. Again kudos to Nikki.
Adios machistas!
Espero que esta ayude
1. Appearance
Anyways. Quick 15 min with Charlie.
It was not a click. At all. She looks OK, 6/10 if that, again this is subjective, face is 5-6/10, quite heavy in the mid line, medium to big size as per my standards, breast 8/10, nipples 9/10, bum 7/10. Hair nice 8-9/10 dark blonde, good
Photos extremely dated, maybe 4 years old, not fit in the waste line. She worked at SVIPS, that tells a lot, that place has a magic photoshopper photographer.
2. Intimacy
Great kisser, 9/10, eyes nice lips nice, bbbj 5/10, no deep throat, no special things to it. Massage ok, again phots are like 4 years dated as well as age is not true by quite a bit. QUITE DEEP voice.
3. Attitude was 9/10. Overall 6/10
Feels like smokes weed, behhh
Overall, for reconnaissance ok for the quality price very suboptimal.
Will not repeat.
Again confirmed my rule with two in a row that above 30 is not my plate. Above 30 is your plate if you are above 55-60 I guess, because, obviously Charlie is an interesting woman to talk to and spent some time with, fall in love and then you won't be picky about the above, especially, if you aren't too young either. So there is a niche for her, for sure, not my cup if tea though. So for the interesting communicator 10/10 hands down.
Ps
Nikki: overall weed smell in the building = much better, short notice communication 10/10, so VC is listening and improving. No deep throat should be communicated though, otherwse whats the point of bbbj 15min? Yes I know 15 min it is a lot to expect from, but no click is no click and photos faaaaar off with the reality etc see above. Again kudos to Nikki.
Adios machistas!
Espero que esta ayude
Last edited:
