CERB In trouble

[kcchiefs]

I heard Cerb might be in alot of trouble
It seems they are banning people , mostly pooners for giving average reviews or stating truthful facts

I heard that one of the Banned Pooners is putting a Law suit aginst the Moderator/owner as he found out who he was thru the IP address

I hear he's doing it based on Freedom of Speech under the Act in the Canadian Freedom's ACT

Give it to CERB, I hope this guy "WINS" Put Cerb owner in his place

I guess Maybe CERB like CL is NEXT

At least Perb is Classy and allows average reviews and fair for both sides and only steps in when It gets out of like Great Job PERB

 

[bigben]

No offense, but is this the place to be gossiping about another board?

 

[kcchiefs]

I just thought I would Post it.. PERB is a lot better than CERB and Cerb isn't fair from what I hear... Cerb isn't allowing Pooners to Post average at Best Reviews about SP's .. Perb allows us Pooners and SP's rights we wouldn't have on Cerb.. that's all. I'm not bad mouthing Cerb, just showing how Perb is a Great Board . We are allowed to get very accurate Reviews and post our opinions and so are the SP's .. as this is Canada, what a Great Place

 

[kenchorney]

You sound like a 12 year old trying to stir up shit. This is as stupid as your post slagging the Korean girls.

https://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?126811-korean-girls

This is your second post about CERB in a week, if you don`t like it don`t go there.

 

[plumbcrawl]

LOL any post that starts with the phrase "I heard" seems suspicious, the fact that Kccheifs is the origin makes it down right laughable...

 

[wpgman69]

I heard Cerb might be in alot of trouble
It seems they are banning people , mostly pooners for giving average reviews or stating truthful facts

Those are their rules. We all know this when we go over there.

I heard that one of the Banned Pooners is putting a Law suit aginst the Moderator/owner as he found out who he was thru the IP address

I hear he's doing it based on Freedom of Speech under the Act in the Canadian Freedom's ACT

I seriously doubt this. It's cerbs playground they don't have to let anyone play there. They can discriminate as they see fit since they make the rules. People get banned from message board all the time. A judge would lol anyone out of the courtroom for coming in with this.

Give it to CERB, I hope this guy "WINS" Put Cerb owner in his place

I guess Maybe CERB like CL is NEXT

At least Perb is Classy and allows average reviews and fair for both sides and only steps in when It gets out of like Great Job PERB

Again, if someone doesn't like reading "positive only" reviews that could potentially be fake, don't go there. It's a review board not a lifestyle. You, me or the SP that we saw last week doesn't have the right to post there unless they allow it. If someone doesn't like those rules then they should probably go somewhere else.

 

[rubintugger]

One of the most bizarre threads I've seen. CERB is sponsored by EC in exchange for funnelling people to EC. Hence the positive review policy, it is advertiser driven, and they can't have you biting the hand that feeds them. Not hard to figure out. Any board can enforce any rules against anyone they want. So how can someone sue someone for something like this?

I agree, the "I heard" sums it all up. I guess with CL down, people need someplace else to stir up the crap...

 

[ladyluck]

Come on KKchief's. I've had some unfavourable thing's about me said over there and I have learned to let it roll off my back. Also the one's that said it are still member's.
It's not all about freedom of speech over there. When you first log in it says "if you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all"
Please don't anyone think that us gal's have anything to do with your banning's. Only you have the ability to type the thing's you want to say. It's different. I personally don't want all the CL girl's to come on and get free advertising. Also all the drama that seems to follow them. Lord know's there's a few questionable one's from there. Don't get me wrong, every so often I would advert on CL. Cerb isn't going anywhere, it's escorts canada's recommendation board, not review board. Big difference!
Let it go it's been said before, it will continuely be said. It's their board not our's

 

[Soleil]

Well said rubintugger and ladyluck!

 

[Jethro Bodine]

CERB is what it is. The Moderator/owner has chosen to run this board in a certain way and like any business owner, that's their perogative.
If you don't like it as a board don't go on and use it. Nobody is putting a gun to your head.
As for the negative reviews not being allowed, that's true but most of us who go on CERB also know that if you ask and don't receive a reply "silence speaks louder than words."
We also use PM's alot. Just because the information isn't publically displayed doesn't mean it is not there.

 

[chicas]

I don't like legal action (even if it was possible). I like the format on Cerb; I hate their policies and the indiscriminate use of ' report this post' used by some self-appointed guardians.
I have learned to keep my mouth shut for the most part ( christ it ain't easy) and each time I say something there I wonder how close to the line I am treading. So far I have never seen Cerb ban anyone for something said on another board, but we will see.
Their policy doesn't make for a heathy exchange of ideas but you have to understabd that is not what cerb is about.
I rejoice when members of any board disses cerb. It makes us think there must be a better way, and some day I hope we see that again.
I stongly dislike when people support Cerb when they understand the fascist manner the governs that board.
I will not boycott ladies on Cerb, but must be true to my beliefs. I have, and I will stop supporting ladies that openly support Cerb.
Here is a challenge : Can you do the same ?
Let the market follow the dollars.

As a final remark, like many westerners, I don't give a sweet f**k what happens in Ottawa, we need to make our own community.

 

[ZoeZee]

I think to use one source of information to make a decision (ie one board only) is not enough, a combination of cerb, perb and pm's (where most of the talk happens anyways) is the best way to make an informed decision about the lady you are about to see. Also, give the lady a call and talk (or email), it's good to get a sense of the person you are going to see. I see no reason to "hate" any board, but use the positive aspects of all of them. It is a bit easier for the ladies to speak freely on cerb than on perb if they don't pay for perb advertising, so it provides a bit of insight into the ladies personalities online.

I think the more sources of information the better.

To not see a lady just because she is on cerb - well, I just don't understand that reasoning. That means you want us to pay to advertise on perb? If a lady is on cerb she can still be reviewed on perb... and all the other ones as well.

just my two cents...

 

[rubintugger]

I will not boycott ladies on Cerb, but must be true to my beliefs. I have, and I will stop supporting ladies that openly support Cerb.
Here is a challenge : Can you do the same ?

Wow, that really cuts down your pooning, 'cause CERB is EC.

If you don't like the format of a board, don't use it. Did you boycott anyone who advertised on CL? Really...

the R in cerb is not the same R in perb. One is a review board the other a recomendation board. Simple. its a who to see, not a who not to see board. I don't see why people have such a hard time with that.

And, like Zoe said, if you only use one source of info, youi ain't getting all the facts. Thats why you used to see half the threads here saying "Has anyone seen xxxxx who advertises on CL?" Now we'll see similar threads with "advertises on C***" or "www.back****.com". And people will still TOFTT, and occasionally there will be a good review posted.

 

[Marius]

I think this debate is indicative of a greater malaise in our North American society, in that we blame the provider of a service over the partaker of that service. It is akin to condemning the church for me taking in Sunday mass and believing in it. CERB/PERB/CAF, whatever, consider the source and enjoy the insight, taking into account the source of the content. I saw an ad over the urinal @ Earls earlier tonight, of a nice pin-up girl who looked like she'd do some wonderful things to me if I just called Michael Sheps and handed over some $$$ for a hair transplant.

Take it with a grain or six of salt, and take a breath.

 

[rubintugger]

Well, looks like the board in question is making out like a bandit with CL down. They get paid by the hit, and they've been hitting like crazy. Just like I bet this place is...

 

[Jethro Bodine]

I heard that one of the Banned Pooners is putting a Law suit aginst the Moderator/owner as he found out who he was thru the IP address

I hear he's doing it based on Freedom of Speech under the Act in the Canadian Freedom's ACT

If this is true, which I doubt, this guy would definitely be on the top 10 Loser/Douche Bags of 2010 list!
1) What kind of a loser does someone have to be to let the rules of an Escort Review/Recommendation Board get them so wound up.
2) If this did end up in court I would hope the judge would not only find against him but order him publically flogged for wasting valuable court time on such a useless case.
3) If this person has the kind of money that it would take to pursue this matter through the legal system, they could certainly do alot more good with it (ie, donating it to charity).
4) If this person is a lawyer and is planning on doing this themselves, they could be using their time and energy more productively doing "pro bono" work for real causes.

 

[charlieb]

Well said Marius.
Also, I see everywhere, websites being accused of violating the right to free speech which shows a blatant misunderstanding of that right. Only governments can violate your right to free speech. As long as one is free to set up a website or blog, your right to free speech has not been violated. No one is obligated to set up a website and let someone else speak freely.