The Porn Dude

Canadian researchers find a simple cure for cancer, but.......?

Ms. Yoko Anna

J.I.L.F
May 19, 2010
567
1
0
mistressyokovictoria.com
Canadian researchers find a simple cure for cancer, but major pharmaceutical companies are not interested.

Researchers at the University of Alberta, in Edmonton, Canada have cured cancer last week, yet there is a little ripple in the news or in TV. It is a simple technique using very basic drug. The method employs dichloroacetate, which is currently used to treat metabolic disorders. So, there is no concern of side effects or about their long term effects.

This drug doesn't require a patent, so anyone can employ it widely and cheaply compared to the costly cancer drugs produced by major pharmaceutical companies.




Canadian scientists tested this dichloroacetate (DCA) on human's cells; it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells and left the healthy cells alone. It was tested on Rats inflicted with severe tumors; their cells shrank when they were fed with water supplemented with DCA. The drug is widely available and the technique is easy to use, why the major drug companies are not involved? Or the Media interested in this find?

In human bodies there is a natural cancer fighting human cell, the mitochondria, but they need to be triggered to be effective. Scientists used to think that these mitochondria cells were damaged and thus ineffective against cancer. So they used to focus on glycolysis, which is less effective in curing cancer and more wasteful. The drug manufacturers focused on this glycolysis method to fight cancer. This DCA on the other hand doesn't rely on glycolysis instead on mitochondria; it triggers the mitochondria which in turn fights the cancer cells.

The side effect of this is it also reactivates a process called apoptosis. You see, mitochondria contain an all-too-important self-destruct button that can't be pressed in cancer cells. Without it, tumors grow larger as cells refuse to be extinguished. Fully functioning mitochondria, thanks to DCA, can once again die.

With glycolysis turned off, the body produces less lactic acid, so the bad tissue around cancer cells doesn't break down and seed new tumors.

Pharmaceutical companies are not investing in this research because DCA method cannot be patented, without a patent they can't make money, like they are doing now with their AIDS Patent. Since the pharmaceutical companies won't develop this, the article says other independent laboratories should start producing this drug and do more research to confirm all the above findings and produce drugs. All the groundwork can be done in collaboration with the Universities, who will be glad to assist in such research and can develop an effective drug for curing cancer.

You can access the original research for this cancer here.

This article wants to raise awareness for this study, hope some independent companies and small startup will pick up this idea and produce these drugs, because the big companies won't touch it for a long time.

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/228583-Scientists-cure-cancer-but-no-one-takes-notice


If anyone out there are specialized in medical fields, please share your thoughts with us.
(of course, anyone is welcome.)

I had a family member lost of cancer, and have one who is going through one now.
Very curious to see what's gonna happen on this.
Cancers are major industry market for pharmaceutical companies.
I won't be surprised if the discovery is rather buried.
 

R the Man

Variety is the spice...
Nov 23, 2002
351
6
18
Somewhere in La La Land
Agree with PeaceGuy. Being in the pharma business myself, I know that if there was something to this, then every lab in the world would be searching for a way to MAKE it patentable (easy to do, just find another molecule that does the same thing!). The lay press usually sensationalizes minor scientific findings that aren't replicated, so I doubt that this is a "cure".

R.
 

Ms. Yoko Anna

J.I.L.F
May 19, 2010
567
1
0
mistressyokovictoria.com
The following is the comment from my pharmacy client.

interesting article. In the united states I believe thay have banned the sale of dichloracetic acid as many people were self* medicating
*
& therefore taking very high doses (in high dose it* may CAUSE cancer). It sounds very promising but without controlled clinical trials, nothing
*
can be proven, only the* media promoting the success stories but not the whole picture.
*
I believe the University of Alberta is trying to organize controlled studies, So, to be absolutely sure, clinical trials must be done. Hope this helps.
 

InnocentBoy

Banned
Mar 5, 2006
845
6
18
You mean you didn't know that drug companies make anything they dont have control over illegal? Hence synthesized drugs are much more dangerous than "illegal" drugs. Just look at the celebrity deaths lately. Its well known that if you want to be cured of cancer you juts go outside the USA.There are nonstop charity and organizations to "cure cancer". Yet chemo the american "accepted" form of treatment makes you 3-4 times iirc more likely to have cancer later on in life. If they really wanted to stop cancer they would look at what the cause is not what the "cure" is.


Big pharma is purposely giving people vaccines there to give them life long issues. The goal is to have everyone on at least two prescription drugs for life. How else would you explain the recent increase in vaccines that are being targeted towards pregnant women? They know that it affects the fetus and will lead to long term problems that they have solutions for. Why else are they telling people that vaccines are mandatory and required by law when it's not? Why else do they force healthcare workers to get vaccinated and find jobs elsewhere?

One thing you wont find however is a back to back test of almish (never vaccinated) against the average vaccinated american. The test favor whoever is paying for the test. you people need to open your eyes.
 
Vancouver Escorts