I just saw this in another thread and I'm wondering what others think about it. I'll withhold the name of the member being quoted as this is not meant to be an attempt to start drama with that member. I just have to admit that while I'm not surprised that this happens, I'm still a bit stunned that it would be admitted to publicly.
Breach of discretion?
- Thread starter Man Mountain
- Start date
The way polls are set up is a little odd. If you don't do it right, the post will appear with no poll options until you create the options. So, I just wanted to put up the options first. Sorry about the confusion.
I get what you are saying Man Mountain and I definitely feel this is a serious breach.The way polls are set up is a little odd. If you don't do it right, the post will appear with no poll options until you create the options. So, I just wanted to put up the options first. Sorry about the confusion.
I have just gone through a long discussion with another SP who shall remain nameless and her former SO was very much in the picture. I was quite disturbed to learn this information.
I was just breezing through that thread yesterday and that remark kind of made me hesitate for a second and bristle. Interesting you should mention it MM. I agree with you, it was definitely improper.
You mean...you never got the Official Handbook either? (I mean the "How To Whore" guidebook, not the "Welcome to PERB" book)
We are humans, and we make mistakes; especially those of us who are late to the game and not quite 'shielded' enough. I'm sorry to hear you haven't felt more welcomed here. There is a lot that goes on here that's a whole lot of hahas, and there's some behaviour that's practically fourth grade. Like a lot of things, you get out of it what you put into it. You had the misfortune of being authentic and honest; perhaps a slip where discretion is concerned, but as you said, you've changed your practices since then, and that ought to be the end of it.
Not sure why anyone should be upset...........I would think that most guys would expect an SP to have some kind of safety net. From where I sit I expect that any SP I see will have another party in the picture that knows whatever she knows about me. Besides, compared to what another of the ladies pulled off recently, what you did is squat.
While it is a breach, I wouldn't get too worked up over it. I got a news flash for everyone. Everything you write in a email isn't private! Shocking right? Your email is stored and analyzed by either the NSA or CSIS. Same with phone calls, text messages.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Data_Center
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Data_Center
Hmmm Husband reading his wife's emails and the John isn't aware his emails to someone's wife are being read? So let me understand - How is this a breach of discretion? First off the guy sending the email has perhaps committed an indiscretion by writing an email to a married woman for the purpose of having sex with her.
Secondly, if the guy reading the letter wasn't the SP's husband, but was the SP's manager or pimp then it might be okay because there should be an expectation that all business transactions with a company could be reviewed by management. So where is the breach of discretion? Discretion meaning better judgement.
I therefore conclude that anyone emailing an escort to arrange for services should not expect the correspondence to be kept private. Again the indiscretion is the writer of the email not the readers of the email. Enuff said.
Secondly, if the guy reading the letter wasn't the SP's husband, but was the SP's manager or pimp then it might be okay because there should be an expectation that all business transactions with a company could be reviewed by management. So where is the breach of discretion? Discretion meaning better judgement.
I therefore conclude that anyone emailing an escort to arrange for services should not expect the correspondence to be kept private. Again the indiscretion is the writer of the email not the readers of the email. Enuff said.
Would this be considered a breach of discretion if it was a handler or booker receiving and responding to the emails?
If not, then why would this be any different, particularly as they were also working together on occasion?
I would assume that at least some ladies would have someone else able to access their account for security reasons, and so I'm
If Evangeline Grace's husband was then breaking the confidence by talking about the information, then it would be a big problem. But, the way this sounds, particularly as it was 5 years ago and doesn't happen now, I would say this is a non-issue in this instance. And until the government introduces certification and mandatory training for courtesans, sex professionals and the like, it shouldn't be surprising that newbies to the business may occasionally screw-up. But, no-one was hurt in this as far as we know, so I don't think there is any real issue.
If not, then why would this be any different, particularly as they were also working together on occasion?
I would assume that at least some ladies would have someone else able to access their account for security reasons, and so I'm
If Evangeline Grace's husband was then breaking the confidence by talking about the information, then it would be a big problem. But, the way this sounds, particularly as it was 5 years ago and doesn't happen now, I would say this is a non-issue in this instance. And until the government introduces certification and mandatory training for courtesans, sex professionals and the like, it shouldn't be surprising that newbies to the business may occasionally screw-up. But, no-one was hurt in this as far as we know, so I don't think there is any real issue.
I'd say it's a breach, but it's not like there are any ethical guidelines to begin a prostitute or a governing body that disciplines escorts, so there is not much that anyone can do about it other than to keep using super fake names and not giving out any information if you're worried about it.
the instant you click that 'send' button on the internet, you have just broadcast it to the 'world wide web'
you no longer own it, and the recipient is free to do with it as they please
it's like when you tell somebody something then tell them 'don't tell anybody though, it's a secret'
yeah right
you no longer own it, and the recipient is free to do with it as they please
it's like when you tell somebody something then tell them 'don't tell anybody though, it's a secret'
yeah right
Last edited:
I don't feel this is an issue at all. A breach would be publicly outing a guy or something to that effect. This is, imho, no different than if we were to be booking with an agency or spa. Evangeline explained the situation well and I think we are trying to read more into it than should be. She has told us she is married and her hubby knows exactly what is going on so it is fine.
Honestly, it's not much different than a business man (or woman) coming home from the office and confiding in the marital bed about what some asshat around the water cooler said or did or how a colleague at work screwed up, when you really think about it. He (she) could even mention said asshats name and it would be kept in the confidence of the marital relationship.
Honestly, it's not much different than a business man (or woman) coming home from the office and confiding in the marital bed about what some asshat around the water cooler said or did or how a colleague at work screwed up, when you really think about it. He (she) could even mention said asshats name and it would be kept in the confidence of the marital relationship.
