Be Provider For a Day Gang 8372

Feenix

New member
Dec 11, 2006
912
0
0
I am here.
Some of you may have read my review of Katie, one of the alumnae of our "Hooker for a Day" group, using two numbers, 8372 and 6196. During our time together we shared many interesting stories, and I asked about these guys.

She is anything but complimentary about these characters. Here is some of what she told me, which explains why the turnoiver is so high:

* The girls are not given keys to the apartment, and are not allowed out once there. I don't know how they get into the suite.

* The handlers do not change the SIM card in the two phones, which we already know, so keep rotating the girls through the same two numbers.

* The girls are all independent, and pay rent for the use of an incall location.

* I did not ask if the handlers get a commission on the income over and above the rent. That will be a future question.

* The girls who end up there are often desperate to find some place safe to work, until they learn the rules they have to work under. It takes just a couple of days for most of them to recognize that the rules are intolerable so they quit. Some do go on to work elsewhere under different names.

Katie has chosen to continue using the name she used there, but is offering outcall only at this time until she finds a decent incall location.

Now I have a better sense and understanding why we only saw a couple favourites for a very short period of time.
 
Last edited:

rick hunter

New member
Jul 6, 2004
361
0
0
Vancouver
You would think with the high turnover, that would be an indication to the people running the place that something isn't working right. What I don't get is why the girls allow their faces to be shown?
 

Edward Lei

Banned
Feb 12, 2009
1,863
5
0
Add one more sketchy detail to this group:

Their incall has at least one camera on site. And no, I'm not talking about the security camera in the lobby or elevator.
 
Vancouver Escorts