Massage Adagio

BBBJ safety ?

Lefty

Swollen Member
Oct 21, 2004
662
29
28
GVA
Any thoughts regarding the std safety of a BBBJ ?

Has anyone had any 'complications' ?

Ladies, I would like to hear your thoughts as well.

Lefty
 

Maury Beniowski

Blastocyst
Mar 31, 2004
1,869
1
0
In a nice wet pussy!
Lefty said:
Any thoughts regarding the std safety of a BBBJ ?

Has anyone had any 'complications' ?
I don't think anyone with half-a-brain would contemplate trying BBBJ just to see if they get any complications. That would be like playing Russian Roulette just to see if you end up with a hole in your head...
 

Avery

Gentleman Horndog
Jul 7, 2003
4,773
20
38
Winnipeg
Lefty, at least once a month, a newbie makes a similar post. If you had done a search for BBBJ, you wouldn't have needed to ask.

There will never be a consensus on BBBJ. Everyone agrees BBFS is way too risky, but the majority of hobbyists I know will always take a BBBJ over a CBJ. Also, far more ladies perform BBBJ than they let on. Many don't want it mentioned publicly because they may not provide it to everyone, and they don't want it to be an expectation.

Here's the result of a poll on TERB (it's still running - 256 votes at the time of this posting). About 60% consider BBBJ to be essential; 30% prefer BBBJ over CBJ, but will accept CBJ if that's all that's offered. I believe it's representative of the hobbying community in general, not just in Toronto.

How necessary is a BBBJ (vs. CBJ or no BJ)?

BBBJ is the whole point of session. 56 votes 21.88%
BBBJ indispensable part of foreplay. 97 votes 37.89%
BBBJ appreciated, but not necessary, CBJ is fine. 77 votes 30.08%
CBJ is preferable to BBBJ. 20 votes 7.81%
BJs of any kind are disliked. 6 votes 2.34%

Total: 256 votes 100.00%
 

tom25

what's up doc?
Oct 7, 2003
1,203
0
0
64
Winnipeg
I prefer CBJ for safety reasons. Irony is that if I hooked up with a lady at a bar I wouldn't hesitate to take a BBBJ. Life is full of contradictions.

Tom
 

roadguy

Member
Oct 11, 2004
60
0
6
Vancouver
According to nurses at the provincial STD clinic recieving oral sex is a low risk
activity for HIV.
Having said that it is possible to become infected through such activity.
It is also possible that I win both 649 three weekends in a row.
 

Cliffy

New member
Jun 21, 2004
48
0
0
55
the question is: are you *more likely* to get an STD from a BBBJ or to win the 6/49... once, even.

Is it even possible to put it into a statistical probability?

1 in 10, 1 in 100 or 1 in 1000 I don't really like the odds...

1 in 50000, 1 in 100000 I can probably live with.
 

static

Banned
Jul 2, 2004
208
0
0
In the past I haven't been a safe guy.

I once had unprotected sex with a 21 year old, who later told me she was a SW and had been working since she was 14.

Plus have had many other non safe oral adventures. Never once have I had an STD. Perhaps I'm just lucky.
 

Lolita

Banned
Dec 12, 2002
371
0
0
It's not safe.

Consider other STDs other than HIV. Too easy too pass.


Drop a bit of lube at the tip and roll one on, I've been told it feels DAMN GOOD.
 

The Lizard King

New member
Jul 8, 2003
1,272
0
0
Well...regardless of the percentages, I think I would have to be with someone a while before anything's uncovered.

That being said, CBJ SUCKS!! All covered activity SUCKS!! Any guy who says it feels the same is a liar. I'm to the point where I would rather hook up with a cutie, have a puff and a glass of wine or two, a little mutual massage and nibbling of non-naughty places, a bit of tickling, and then be finished off with a nice uncovered slowwww wank! Oopps gotta go....
 
hifisex said:
who are the six guys who don't like getting their pecker sucked? :confused:
These two votes 3 times each.


 

Avery

Gentleman Horndog
Jul 7, 2003
4,773
20
38
Winnipeg
It's not that they don't like getting it sucked. They just suck their own. Auto-fellatio, you know? :D
 
Vancouver Escorts