BBBJ safer than covered intercourse?

classycarly

Change is good
Sep 21, 2006
121
1
0
Hi health nurse,

There are girls in Victoria being told that the health nurses have stated that giving a BBBJ is safer than having intercourse with a condom. Is this true? If so, could you please point me in the direction of statistical or pertinent studies or information confirming this? I've been around a long time and have never heard that before. Thanks so much.
 

Health Nurse

Supporting Member
Nov 24, 2004
882
4
0
Hi health nurse,

There are girls in Victoria being told that the health nurses have stated that giving a BBBJ is safer than having intercourse with a condom. Is this true? If so, could you please point me in the direction of statistical or pertinent studies or information confirming this? I've been around a long time and have never heard that before. Thanks so much.
Hi classycarly

I have never heard that a bbbj is safer than having intercourse with a condom. Very interesting information, I have heard that a bbbj is less riskier than unprotected intercourse.

Since many of the infections pass different ways I think I should look at each infection separately and break down the risk. We also assume that condoms used properly each time with no breakages.


Gonorrhea:

Risk to the woman:

BBBJ: Good evidence that gonorrhea passes to the throat.

Intercourse with a condom: Condoms offer excellent protection against gonorrhea. I guess if gonorrhea did infect the cervix there is more potential damage than if it infected the throat but we are saying a condom was used correctly with no breakages.


Chlamydia:

Risk to the woman:

BBBJ: Good evidence that chlamydia passes to the throat.

Intercourse with a condom: Condoms offer excellent protection against chlamydia. I guess if chlamydia did infect the cervix there is more potential damage than if it infected the throat but we are saying a condom was used correctly with no breakages.


Syphilis:

Risk to the woman:

BBBJ: Good evidence that syphilis can pass to the mouth.

Intercourse with a condom: Because syphilis passes from skin to skin contact by a syphilis sore condoms do not offer complete protection but using a condom would offer more protection than a bbbj.


HIV

Risk to the woman:

BBBJ: This would be considered a low risk for HIV transmission.

Intercourse with a condom: Condoms offer great protection against HIV transmission. If the condom broke you would go straight to high risk but we are assuming condoms are used every time with no breakages.


Human papillomavirus (genital warts (HPV))

Risk to the woman:

BBBJ: There is evidence that HPV can be transmitted to the mouth. The risk of this HPV in the mouth is still unknown.

Intercourse with a condom: Given that HPV passes from skin to skin transmission condoms do not offer complete transmission. Condoms do offer some protection but HPV can still be transmitted. Currently it appears that there is more health concerns with getting HPV on the cervix than in the throat. This is due to the know risk of cervical cancer being linked to HPV.


Herpes simplex virus (HSV)

Risk to the woman:


BBBJ: Good evidence that HSV can pass to the mouth.

Intercourse with a condom: Because HSV passes from skin to skin contact condoms do not offer complete protection. Condoms do offer some protection but HSV can still be transmitted.


From the above it seems overall that bbbj is more risky in most cases when compared with intercourse with a condom that is used properly with no breakages.


HN
www.healthnurse.wordpress.com
www.stiresource.com
www.bccdc.ca
 

Stella_Hardon

New member
Apr 29, 2006
335
2
0
Hi health nurse,

There are girls in Victoria being told that the health nurses have stated that giving a BBBJ is safer than having intercourse with a condom. Is this true? If so, could you please point me in the direction of statistical or pertinent studies or information confirming this? I've been around a long time and have never heard that before. Thanks so much.
Hi Health Nurse .. So far it seems the SP is taking on all the risk for the BBBJ. Can you outline the risk of a BBBJ for the Perbert ?
 

Health Nurse

Supporting Member
Nov 24, 2004
882
4
0
I am wondering if there is statistical data kept on oral transmission of stis in Vancouver. I am hoping you have numbers that are separate from infection by intercourse.
It would be awesome to know all the numbers for different stis for both oral sex and intercourse. If you don't have just Vancouver numbers, maybe there are BC ones?

Thank you SO very much.
I don't know if we've told you lately, but we really really appreciate you!!!

xoxo
Nina


Hi Sexy Nina Leone

Thanks for your kind words, we certainly enjoy being on the site.

Here is a link to the 2008 STI/HIV annual report for BC.
http://www.bccdc.ca/NR/rdonlyres/93...008AnnualSurveillancereport_Final_amended.pdf

It gives a lot of details on numbers and what areas of BC.

The one thing that is lacking is the number of oral transmission. We know from the work in our clinics and other research that many STI can pass with oral sex. What we find in reality is that there are not many tests done on the throat outside of STI clinics so the numbers are never reported. In some cases there is not a test available, like in BC we do not have a validated test for chlamydia in the throat.

This is the reason we always recommend that partners get treatment even if their tests are negative. Since most of the time they only do a test to the genitals.

HN
www.healthnurse.wordpress.com
www.stiresource.com
www.bccdc.ca
 
Vancouver Escorts