More like 1% do...IMHO
This is the kind of rumour naive newspaper reporters come online to seek...
This is the kind of rumour naive newspaper reporters come online to seek...
Ban BBFS threads and posters
- Thread starter georgebushmoron
- Start date
Looks like I've lost. Not because I did a bad job convincing you. In fact, the way it played out, my performance could not be measured because none of you were ever willing to sincerely enter the debate. Your minds were made up long ago. Even if the underlying current of thought had been to cling to the ideology that more information makes better decisions, not even one of you could think outside of that. I challenged you, and in response I got ridicule and deaf ears. Taste your victory, if your taste buds even work.
Bah, don't take it too hard Georgie; we just like ganging up on dogmatic types. You were just fresh meat!
Maybe their SO's, but I doubt that very many -- much less a majority -- are doing vaginal or anal intercourse with any of their clients BB.Tyler Durden said:
What's the source of your info?
Naah -- the real Dubya is a closeted gay. It goes back to his college days.Maury Beniowski said:
Remember his black eye from allegedly choking on a potato chip? -- rough trade sex.
And fake-journalist-cum-gay-prostitute Jeff Gannon/Jim Guckert's many documented but unexplained White House visits were very likely to service the real Dubya, unless they were for Karl Rove. Or maybe both?
OK, Dubya, I'm willing to say that your argument is a good and subtle one, and that I can see the validity in each viewpoint. I feel no need to take sides, and am happy to have been enlightened by both viewpoints.georgebushmoron said:
Last edited:
Well said Avery and Modwest
As Avery noted, the trouble is in determining the validity of a post, given its potential impact on an SP's reputation and business. Fortunately, most people have a healthy skepticism towards such posts - especially from a newbie. Such a post from a long term poster who has built credibility after a series of legitimate reviews over a long period of time, however, carries more weight. But even then, there is always the question of whether there is a hidden agenda at work.
So yes, the information should be posted. But whoever posts it should be prepared to have the legitimacy of their post vigorously challenged to test the veracity of the information presented.
There is one point, however, that appears to have been overlooked and should be mentioned.
If someone posts they've had BBFS with an SP, it is wonderful to see that it is usually met with a barrage of "Are you out of your fzcking mind!?!?" followed by a lengthy discourse in a number of other posts by others of the dangers of unprotected sex with an SP or with anyone else for that matter (outside of a committed, long term stable relationship where neither partner fools around outside the relationship). Maybe, just maybe, such comments will help convince some idiot contemplating bareback to think twice and then refrain - if not for their health then perhaps out of consideration for others.
I don't care whether someone picks up a girl at a club and gets sex for free or hires an SP. IMHO, in this day and age anyone (male or female) who goes bareback with anyone else not only shows their own stupidity and lack of self-respect and respect for the person they're with, but also shows a total lack of respect for the health and safety of others.
And anyone who buys the "well....you look clean so it should be safe" line lacks both commonsense and a basic understanding of STDs that is necessary today to protect themselves and others.
Have fun, but for everyone's sake always play safe.
ModWest said:
I have to agree with both Modwest and Avery on this one.Avery said:
As Avery noted, the trouble is in determining the validity of a post, given its potential impact on an SP's reputation and business. Fortunately, most people have a healthy skepticism towards such posts - especially from a newbie. Such a post from a long term poster who has built credibility after a series of legitimate reviews over a long period of time, however, carries more weight. But even then, there is always the question of whether there is a hidden agenda at work.
So yes, the information should be posted. But whoever posts it should be prepared to have the legitimacy of their post vigorously challenged to test the veracity of the information presented.
There is one point, however, that appears to have been overlooked and should be mentioned.
If someone posts they've had BBFS with an SP, it is wonderful to see that it is usually met with a barrage of "Are you out of your fzcking mind!?!?" followed by a lengthy discourse in a number of other posts by others of the dangers of unprotected sex with an SP or with anyone else for that matter (outside of a committed, long term stable relationship where neither partner fools around outside the relationship). Maybe, just maybe, such comments will help convince some idiot contemplating bareback to think twice and then refrain - if not for their health then perhaps out of consideration for others.
I don't care whether someone picks up a girl at a club and gets sex for free or hires an SP. IMHO, in this day and age anyone (male or female) who goes bareback with anyone else not only shows their own stupidity and lack of self-respect and respect for the person they're with, but also shows a total lack of respect for the health and safety of others.
And anyone who buys the "well....you look clean so it should be safe" line lacks both commonsense and a basic understanding of STDs that is necessary today to protect themselves and others.
Have fun, but for everyone's sake always play safe.
Last edited:
