The analogy has nothing to do with what one should do with the iPhone or the railroad or postal service. It's the duplicity and asinine reasoning of "but you inherited an iPhone." LOL! Your ability (or lack thereof) to grasp/comprehend an analogy is truly astonishing. I'll try and simplify for you. If one believes that colonizing another country to exploit that country's resources is wrong, that's it. Full stop, end of discussion. Stating things like "but they inherited a railroad" or "they inherited a postal service" or "but they got to learn English" or whatever is merely an attempt to justify an initial act of wrong doing. In other words, the outcome (no matter what that outcome is) is rather irrelevant since it arose from an initial act of wrong doing - and the outcome(s) certainly cannot justify the initial act of wrong doing.Your analogy is as comically simplistic as the video. Following your twisted logic, the new iPhone would be thrown away, rather than be used.
Not to mention - the burgler didn't actually use engineering, technology, ability and knowledge to build the iPhone he left.
Last edited:







