Aristocrat New Website Is Up

Previous Thread Next Thread
M

Markl

New member
Jul 25, 2008
1,145
6
0
Interesting website April.

No clutter and week at a glance. Kinda nice.
 
P

prairie_boy

New member
Dec 30, 2002
26
0
1
The map & directions have to be about the clearest I've ever seen - would be very helpful to those not familiar with the city.

Might turn out to be a good site.
 
G

gumbyman6900

Dirty Old Man!
Oct 11, 2008
261
3
0
Edmonton
Generally it is nice, however having flash frames is kind of a pain... what happens to the poor NoOb who doesn't know where to go and wants to print your map that you so nicely present.

I really do like the link to the girls as well. The hover over SP feature is very very nice, but a gallery section would still be nice as well to cover those scenarios where you phone in and a different SP is covering for one that is on the schedule.

Just the opinion of one of the many pervs. :p
 
N

Nasty Networks

New member
Feb 4, 2009
2
0
0
Download Map Info

gumbyman6900 said:
Generally it is nice, however having flash frames is kind of a pain... what happens to the poor NoOb who doesn't know where to go and wants to print your map that you so nicely present.
Click to expand...
This development for this website started from what the owners wanted, then moved to what the girls wanted and has now moved to what the viewers want.

There is an earlier post made a few months ago in which the poster suggested that all a website needs is a schedule, pics of the girls, and a map so he knows how to get to the place. So that is what we've tried to stick to, no more, no less.

Now of course it is not possible to please everyone all the time, so as long as something makes good common sense and is agreeable to most viewers, I don't have a problem accommodating any suggestions or criticisms.

gumbyman6900, I will take all of the map info and put it into a word doc file and make it downloadable so you can print out the info. I think this is a great suggestion and will benefit more than one viewer in the long run, so thanks for the great idea.

Thank you for the great response to the site and feel free to PM me with any other criticisms or suggestions for the site.

Nasty Networks
 
T

TEL27

Member
Sep 21, 2005
123
0
16
Nice design but would have been nice if the pics where new. Rebecca and carmela have had those same pics for years
 
Extreme April

Extreme April

New member
Sep 8, 2007
786
6
0
Edmonton
TEL27 said:
Nice design but would have been nice if the pics where new. Rebecca and carmela have had those same pics for years
Click to expand...
The girls are getting pics done. In fact one photographer is going to the studio tonight to take some pics of a few girls and will be until all the girls are done.

Also there is another photographer coming next week to take more pics.

So bare with us. We are slowly getting them done.

love and laughs
April
 
T

TEL27

Member
Sep 21, 2005
123
0
16
Nice design but would have been nice if the pics where new. Rebecca and carmela have had those same pics for years
 
Extreme April

Extreme April

New member
Sep 8, 2007
786
6
0
Edmonton
littlejonny said:
Tell Cassie and Nina that they're way too good looking not to have pics up.:)
Click to expand...
Sorry babe, I totally agree that they are very beautiful and should get pics done. But even body parts can be recognized. And for this alone, these lovely ladies will NOT be getting any done.

You will all just have to come in and say hi to them personally.

love and laughs
April
 
S

sixdefault

New member
May 1, 2006
3
0
1
With respect, this web site isn't very good. I hover on elements and the flash content changes; I hover off those elements and it changes again; I can't view the content I would like to see and of course, this is very frustrating. I've viewed the site with both Safari and Firefox - I can't say if this is how it is viewed or supposed to function in Explorer because I don't use it. It fails W3C validation in a spectacular fashion with 32 errors & 1 warning; this site is not standards compliant.

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0

respect,

-jb
 
N

Nasty Networks

New member
Feb 4, 2009
2
0
0
Just For You My Friend

Personally, I don't follow the W3C standards. Although I agree with the goal of a universal standard, this is idealistic but not practical. The poor performance of the W3C has led to the formation of competing groups such as the Web Services Interoperability Organization (WS-I).

The majority of websites would not pass the W3C validator. However, since you requested it, www.aristocratmassage.com is now W3C compliant. Additionally, the site is checked daily on Firefox and Explorer and works well on both browsers. Any errors that may result are usually eliminated by clearing the cache.

Thank you for your comment and I hope you will enjoy the site more, now that it is W3C compliant as per your wishes.

Pls click to show the validator results:

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0
 
jim

jim

New member
May 11, 2002
3,478
22
0
Over 2 hands plus a mouthful big
Nasty Networks said:
Personally, I don't follow the W3C standards. Although I agree with the goal of a universal standard, this is idealistic but not practical. The poor performance of the W3C has led to the formation of competing groups such as the Web Services Interoperability Organization (WS-I).

The majority of websites would not pass the W3C validator. However, since you requested it, www.aristocratmassage.com is now W3C compliant. Additionally, the site is checked daily on Firefox and Explorer and works well on both browsers. Any errors that may result are usually eliminated by clearing the cache.

Thank you for your comment and I hope you will enjoy the site more, now that it is W3C compliant as per your wishes.

Pls click to show the validator results:

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0
Click to expand...
I agree with you that the vast majority of sites won't pass. But this is my the main reason for my post. I have to say:

WOW​


Talk about some fast reaction, would never have expected any action on the standards post. Good job!
 
T

TOMMYG

Active member
Apr 11, 2005
123
69
28
It is a nice start, but it needs a lot of work. Definitely needs better pictures. I just made a visit there for the first time and saw Sofie. Nice looking girl and very pleasant. Short Greek girl with nice butts and nice natural boobs. Worth repeating.
 
C

calgary_guy25

ponnorabatabie
Nov 17, 2006
105
0
0
sixdefault said:
With respect, this web site isn't very good. I hover on elements and the flash content changes; I hover off those elements and it changes again; I can't view the content I would like to see and of course, this is very frustrating. I've viewed the site with both Safari and Firefox - I can't say if this is how it is viewed or supposed to function in Explorer because I don't use it. It fails W3C validation in a spectacular fashion with 32 errors & 1 warning; this site is not standards compliant.

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=h...(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0

respect,

-jb
Click to expand...
.... agree :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Ashley Madison
Previous Thread Next Thread
Vancouver Escorts
Top Bottom