Another Proud moment for the Police--10 yo girl tasered
- Thread starter HeMadeMeDoIt
- Start date
And to hear his fat slob useless POS boss defend itHe had no other choice?
Are you kidding me??!!
A grown man had no other choice than to use a taser on a 10 year old girl? Seriously....
Fucking shamelessI wonder if they taser their new borns too
Well of course they tazered her
Cops now a days are not allowed to touch people so they tazer them instead.
How would the story go if the cop went and slapped the kid instead
Cops are kinda in a no win situation if you don't listen to them they cant hit ya can't tazer you what are they supposed to really do ?
Back in the day you mouthed off you got a smack you ever attacked a cop you got a free trip to the hospital.
Cops now a days are not allowed to touch people so they tazer them instead.
How would the story go if the cop went and slapped the kid instead
Cops are kinda in a no win situation if you don't listen to them they cant hit ya can't tazer you what are they supposed to really do ?
Back in the day you mouthed off you got a smack you ever attacked a cop you got a free trip to the hospital.
Thats how it was where I grew up as well......I don't agree with the tazing the kid, but really the kid needed to be brought under control.....
I don't know exactly what happened as I only saw a video of them talking about it after... but unless the child has a weapon, I can see no reason to tazer a ten year old girl.Well of course they tazered her
Cops now a days are not allowed to touch people so they tazer them instead.
How would the story go if the cop went and slapped the kid instead
Cops are kinda in a no win situation if you don't listen to them they cant hit ya can't tazer you what are they supposed to really do ?
Back in the day you mouthed off you got a smack you ever attacked a cop you got a free trip to the hospital.
. I honestly don't see a reason to slap them either.... a cop should be trained in ways to take people/children down.... and then use some good old fashion handcuffs.... or something.... rope... j/kI dunno... if the cop tosses the kid down, it'll be considered as abuse. If the cop knocks the kid down and the kid fractures/breaks something, all those anti-policing folks will be screaming police brutality.I don't know exactly what happened as I only saw a video of them talking about it after... but unless the child has a weapon, I can see no reason to tazer a ten year old girl.
Either way, the officer is screwed. Anything including yelling and above will be considered as "excessive".
Yup...that's the way I see it too. Tough situation that necessitated some quick thinking. I think he did the right thing though, without risking his career.
All of you who think that it's easy to put handcuffs on someone who is agitated and aggressive on drugs needs to try and do it him or herself. It's not easy, especially given the restrictions placed on police officers these days. You could end up with a lawsuit and your whole career is in jeopardy. Most of you have NO idea what these guys and girls go through in just one shift. Most of these situations deal with people high on recreational drugs that are mixed by who-the-fuck-knows, and just trying to have a good time.
Quit with the rhetoric that the media feeds you to keep you hungry on a daily basis and wake the fuck up!
Panther
All of you who think that it's easy to put handcuffs on someone who is agitated and aggressive on drugs needs to try and do it him or herself. It's not easy, especially given the restrictions placed on police officers these days. You could end up with a lawsuit and your whole career is in jeopardy. Most of you have NO idea what these guys and girls go through in just one shift. Most of these situations deal with people high on recreational drugs that are mixed by who-the-fuck-knows, and just trying to have a good time.
Quit with the rhetoric that the media feeds you to keep you hungry on a daily basis and wake the fuck up!
Panther
I love how people get all in a huff about this when you have no idea what the kid was doing, how big the kid was, whether they had a weapon or were biting etc, if they were known to police, had gang connections. You may find it hard to believe but there are HEAPS of 10 yr olds in gangs that carry weapons and have no fear of the police. Until you know the facts I think it is best left unsaid as we really don't know what happened. Perhaps a link to the actual incident?
I agree
It is a no win situation for the police.
Without being able to see what happened, or how violent the child was.
Makes it even harded to understand or have sympathy for the officer.
But nowadays, children are getting more unrully and violent at earlier ages.
Why? Because they know they can get away with it.
When I found out my child was stealing (10 years old) I went to the comunity police,
to scare her, so she would not do it again.
He said afterwards: Althought it was great that I stepped up and tried to do something. It had no effect Because she knew there was nothing that would happen to her, until she turned 12.
He said that she could even go and murder someone and get away with it WTF.
So it makes it hard for me to pass judgement on this officer.
because of the few children who are the more nastier, violent and smarter at a younger age.
It is a no win situation for the police.
Without being able to see what happened, or how violent the child was.
Makes it even harded to understand or have sympathy for the officer.
But nowadays, children are getting more unrully and violent at earlier ages.
Why? Because they know they can get away with it.
When I found out my child was stealing (10 years old) I went to the comunity police,
to scare her, so she would not do it again.
He said afterwards: Althought it was great that I stepped up and tried to do something. It had no effect Because she knew there was nothing that would happen to her, until she turned 12.
He said that she could even go and murder someone and get away with it WTF.
So it makes it hard for me to pass judgement on this officer.
because of the few children who are the more nastier, violent and smarter at a younger age.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34014497/ns/us_news-life/
well.....here's the story. Sorry I don't know how to post links so you can just click on it - so you'll have to copy and paste.
All I have to say is this does not sound like a gang related girl nor a girl with a gun...... So She better be damn huge or the cop must be really small!
If you can't take down a 10 year old girl without a taser that's pretty bad. Especially when you know that you aren't suppose to use it on a child 14 or under.
Cops are trained in combat situations by different mixed martial arts teachers. I personally think that is pretty bad! Just my opinion~!
well.....here's the story. Sorry I don't know how to post links so you can just click on it - so you'll have to copy and paste.
All I have to say is this does not sound like a gang related girl nor a girl with a gun...... So She better be damn huge or the cop must be really small!
If you can't take down a 10 year old girl without a taser that's pretty bad. Especially when you know that you aren't suppose to use it on a child 14 or under.
Cops are trained in combat situations by different mixed martial arts teachers. I personally think that is pretty bad! Just my opinion~!
melissa.in.abby;966808 I honestly don't see a reason to slap them either.... a cop should be trained in ways to take people/[B said:
yeah, right. Remeber that piece of shit in Victoria and her daughter?
The cops picked her up stoned, alone on the streets and when they eventually found the parents they couldn't wake them, ( and they didn't care where she was anyway), so the cops keep her in a holding cell over-night for her own protection and the mom and kid sue AND WIN.
Let's beat up the cops again because some hillbilly did something that doesn't set well with whoever. Consider the location, OZARK, Arkansas. I'm the surprised the kid wasn't his fiancee. The place has a population of less then 4,000, so I doubt this was a place where you are going to get cops with a lot of training in anything, let alone martial arts and the like. In a lot of these towns you can get hired as a cop just as long as you can read and write, walk and chew gum at the same time.
Besides, what the hell kind of parent calls the cops because the kid refused to take a bath/shower ? As to using a taser on her, well let's see your reaction to getting kicked in the nuts a couple times.
Besides, what the hell kind of parent calls the cops because the kid refused to take a bath/shower ? As to using a taser on her, well let's see your reaction to getting kicked in the nuts a couple times.
Last edited:
Reality
Comments suggesting the police have to use tasers because they can't use force are garbage. The police can use reasonable force. The question falls to what is reasonable.
The officer in the interview said that the way the taser was used on the 10 year old would do nothing to control the child. He said it would only cause pain. In other words, if the child was dangerous the taser could be expected to make the child more dangerous. I expect the child was not dangerous. I expect the officer choose to inflict pain because he wanted compliance and was too lazy and incompetent to get compliance any other way.
We are all doing a lot of guessing and the inquiry into the Polish fellow's death/murder at YVR makes it clear that the police will lie so it is hard to get good info. Regardless, there are major problems with the use of force by police and the investigations that follow.
The case of Paul Boyd may be the worst example of the problem in BC. From the BC Civil Liberties web site;
- only one officer fired on Mr. Boyd, no other police officers fired a shot;
- the shooting officer fired at least four shots after a direction had been given to the attending officers to “hold their fire;”
- Mr. Boyd was hit by at least four bullets and possibly five bullets after he was completely disarmed, including the final bullet that hit Mr. Boyd in the head when Mr. Boyd was crawling;
There were eight officers standing around mr. Boyd. The one officer put 7 bullets into Paul Boyd before a final shot to the head, for a total of eight shots. The officer claims he shot mr. Boyd in the head because after the first seven shots failed to kill the man he thought Mr. Boyd was wearing a bullet proof vest. In other words, he thought the man might survive the first seven bullets so he put one in the man's head to make sure that didn't happen.
It is obvious from the Criminal Justice Branch statement that the officer went trigger happy and is guilty of murder or manslaughter. Despite this the Criminal Justice Branch found no reason to lay charges. They even said that the officers actions were consistent with his training.
In other words the BC Government Criminal Justice Branch has determined that it is OK for a police officer to shoot someone in the head while that person is unarmed, on the ground at some distance and no threat to anyone.
I have combined my own comments with material from the BC Civil Liberties site. If you want to challenge what I have said, please read the material on the site first so you have a better idea of what may have happened.
Chatter on a web site is a waste of time if you don't do something in response. If you can't think of what to do try looking at the http://www.bccla.org/ web site. You should get lots of ideas there, even if it is nothing more that making a donation. If people fail to support such organizations then they will fail because the government certainly will not provide support.
Comments suggesting the police have to use tasers because they can't use force are garbage. The police can use reasonable force. The question falls to what is reasonable.
The officer in the interview said that the way the taser was used on the 10 year old would do nothing to control the child. He said it would only cause pain. In other words, if the child was dangerous the taser could be expected to make the child more dangerous. I expect the child was not dangerous. I expect the officer choose to inflict pain because he wanted compliance and was too lazy and incompetent to get compliance any other way.
We are all doing a lot of guessing and the inquiry into the Polish fellow's death/murder at YVR makes it clear that the police will lie so it is hard to get good info. Regardless, there are major problems with the use of force by police and the investigations that follow.
The case of Paul Boyd may be the worst example of the problem in BC. From the BC Civil Liberties web site;
- only one officer fired on Mr. Boyd, no other police officers fired a shot;
- the shooting officer fired at least four shots after a direction had been given to the attending officers to “hold their fire;”
- Mr. Boyd was hit by at least four bullets and possibly five bullets after he was completely disarmed, including the final bullet that hit Mr. Boyd in the head when Mr. Boyd was crawling;
There were eight officers standing around mr. Boyd. The one officer put 7 bullets into Paul Boyd before a final shot to the head, for a total of eight shots. The officer claims he shot mr. Boyd in the head because after the first seven shots failed to kill the man he thought Mr. Boyd was wearing a bullet proof vest. In other words, he thought the man might survive the first seven bullets so he put one in the man's head to make sure that didn't happen.
It is obvious from the Criminal Justice Branch statement that the officer went trigger happy and is guilty of murder or manslaughter. Despite this the Criminal Justice Branch found no reason to lay charges. They even said that the officers actions were consistent with his training.
In other words the BC Government Criminal Justice Branch has determined that it is OK for a police officer to shoot someone in the head while that person is unarmed, on the ground at some distance and no threat to anyone.
I have combined my own comments with material from the BC Civil Liberties site. If you want to challenge what I have said, please read the material on the site first so you have a better idea of what may have happened.
Chatter on a web site is a waste of time if you don't do something in response. If you can't think of what to do try looking at the http://www.bccla.org/ web site. You should get lots of ideas there, even if it is nothing more that making a donation. If people fail to support such organizations then they will fail because the government certainly will not provide support.
a few weeks ago
A family member went to the sky train, and witnessed 4 cop cars.
Thought it was a bunch of guys causing problems.
When she got to the station, she saw the it was a boy and girl.
She said they both looked about 10 years old.
It took all of them to restrain and get control of the situation..
She was just shocked at how violent these two were.
Just makes you wonder
A family member went to the sky train, and witnessed 4 cop cars.
Thought it was a bunch of guys causing problems.
When she got to the station, she saw the it was a boy and girl.
She said they both looked about 10 years old.
It took all of them to restrain and get control of the situation..
She was just shocked at how violent these two were.
Just makes you wonder
Just have to watch two drunk women fight - it's almost impossible to control someone who is totally out of control.
Arkansa?
I would have to agree with the preceding comments about lack of training, lack of intelligence, lack of just about anything....
Come to think of it, given the reputation of locality, it is a wonder that he did not decide to settle her down by whipping out his cock and fucking her.
Unfortunately, policing is seen by many as an unskilled job. It does not really pay well and you might get killed or easily suffer a permanent disabilty. . Given the pay scale and the risks: what type of people do you think are attracted to policing? I suspect that quite a few are really big on control (probably have poor self - esteem). I also suspect that many of them don't really have alot going for them and probably don't have alot of career choices that will allow the them to make a decent wage (in this they are alot like many professional athletes - if it was not for the sport they excel in, alot of them would be pumping gas).
In conclusion, there are some pretty good cops out there and we should be grateful for them. Unfortunately, there are sompe pretty poor ones also.
I would have to agree with the preceding comments about lack of training, lack of intelligence, lack of just about anything....
Come to think of it, given the reputation of locality, it is a wonder that he did not decide to settle her down by whipping out his cock and fucking her.
Unfortunately, policing is seen by many as an unskilled job. It does not really pay well and you might get killed or easily suffer a permanent disabilty. . Given the pay scale and the risks: what type of people do you think are attracted to policing? I suspect that quite a few are really big on control (probably have poor self - esteem). I also suspect that many of them don't really have alot going for them and probably don't have alot of career choices that will allow the them to make a decent wage (in this they are alot like many professional athletes - if it was not for the sport they excel in, alot of them would be pumping gas).
In conclusion, there are some pretty good cops out there and we should be grateful for them. Unfortunately, there are sompe pretty poor ones also.
