Another disappointing waste of time: Sexy young ready to please you !250-858-6120

[ariesram]

Hello all,

It sucks to bear bad news once again, but I think people offering their services to clients with ads on bp and elsewhere need to be held accountable. The same goes for those who answer said ads as clients, by the way.

That said, the woman on the other end of this ad: Sexy young ready to please you !250-858-6120 - 22.
Discreet young tight
Open-minded
Private incall location .
5'7
130 poulds
Huge tits
250-858-6120

..was very rude and disrespectful along with some dude, pimp, boyfriend, buddy?.

Simple story really. I made an appointment for 4:00 at her place near Tillicum. The time draws near, I text to get the address, no response from the girl. At four o'clock, I phone and she answers. I say hello and how's it going, and she then puts some moron on the phone who just attempts to mimic everything I say. It was amusing in a four year old kind of way for about two seconds. Then I was done. This smacks of junkie and pimp to me, or at least, someone who has little respect for the general public and potential clients. Stay away.

 

[nondeju]

Yep, you will see a lot of this
Most escorts seem to have gone independent
With the new law in place, they can advertise their services
conduct their own business and make more money that way.
It's not illegal to provide or buy these services if it is done inside a house.

 

[nondeju]

Isn't it a real pain in the ass being tricked, lured and defrauded by these imposters? Yes, they should be held accountable and procescuted.

 

[delta29]

The claim that "it's not illegal to buy these services if it is done inside a house" is untrue.

 

[nondeju]

do some research before you answer

 

[mrhat0666]

Hey Ariesram, good thing you didnt go see her. Her pictures came back from tineye with numerous hits as a fake profile.

 

[majordomo]

The claim that "it's not illegal to buy these services if it is done inside a house" is untrue.

+1

I find no provisions in Bill C-36 that exempts the purchase of sexual services from an independent provider working from "a house", so I'd be interested in learning how you drew that conclusion, nondeju.

Advising Perb readers on the legality of said activity is a pretty dangerous statement to make with no supporting evidence. I'd hate to think someone would think there's no risk in visiting an independent because of your post, even though I'd agree that with independents there's much less exposure to potential legal problems than you might encounter visiting an agency.

 

[nondeju]

I wil forward the applicable info as soon as I get home

 

[nondeju]

Escort agencies:

It is not illegal for an individual to work for an escort agency as long as they are licensed to do so by the city. Further, engaging in non-sexual services while working for the agency is not illegal. For example, an escort who merely accompanies a john, or client, to a social gathering is not doing anything illegal. However,

if it is implied that a sex act is available but will cost the client extra and a discussion ensues about price for sexual services, and if the discussion occurs in a public place, then the john and the escort are committing an illegal act (i.e., communication for the purpose of prostitution -- s. 213). If, however, the discussion occurs in a private residence, no offence has been committed.

Massage parlours:

It is not illegal for an individual to work for a massage parlour as long as they are licensed to do so by the city. Further, engaging in non-sexual services while working for the parlour is not illegal. A masseuse who actually just gives massages is not doing anything illegal. Performing sexual services in a massage clinic may be illegal if the police can prove the clinic is a place which has prostitution as its purpose.

If it is implied that a sex act is available but will cost the client extra and a discussion ensues about price for sexual services, the masseuse and client are committing an illegal act (communication for the purpose of prostitution -- s. 213) unless the discussion occurs in a massage room. In that case, no illegal act has been committed.

http://www.edmontonpolice.ca/commun...on/prostitution/legalitiesofprostitution.aspx

 

[majordomo]

No arguments there, but I don't see how any of that makes what you said true.

It's not illegal to provide or buy these services if it is done inside a house.

 

[nondeju]

All you have to do is disguise it as a donation for her time or companionship. It will still be up to the authorities to decide if prostititution took place or not. What two people do in the confines of one's home is a private matter. I have not heard of any raids on homes frequented by sex workers have you? The law is mainly concerned about the public issue, exposure to minors, etc. Not behind closed doors.

 

[majordomo]

Low risk is not the same thing as legal. I agree that the risk of encountering law enforcement with independent ladies is far lower than with agencies, but that does not make it legal.

 

[amarekl]

I think that nondeju does not understand a difference between the law and actual policy guidelines how to enforce it. It was about it lots of discussion on Terb by lawyers. The Bill made it criminal offence to buy sex no exception. However, it was so poorly written that it may even apply to dating sites etc as long as you offer sth for sex. As a result, police departments prepared some guidelines what to do. Some said that they were not going to do anything as long as minors/pimping and similar stuff are not involved. Others, consider this as low priority. BUT, if they somehow get a vip guy, they will shame him and pay 2k at least.

 

[nondeju]

Well, I guess all these people posting here about their sexual encounters with SP talking about donations, the sex act that was performed, etc. are admitting to have committed a criminal offense!

How you want to interpret the Bill is your prerogative, however
Bill C-36 treats prostitution as a form of sexual exploitation that disproportionately impacts on women and girls. Its overall objectives are to:
Protect those who sell their own sexual services;
Protect communities, and especially children, from the harms caused by prostitution; and
Reduce the demand for prostitution and its incidence.

The new criminal law regime seeks to protect the dignity and equality of all Canadians by denouncing and prohibiting the purchase of sexual services, the exploitation of the prostitution of others, the development of economic interests in the sexual exploitation of others and the institutionalization of prostitution through commercial enterprises, such as strip clubs, massage parlours and escort agencies that offer sexual services for sale.

 

[majordomo]

Well, I guess all these people posting here about their sexual encounters with SP talking about donations, the sex act that was performed, etc. are admitting to have committed a criminal offense!

That is correct. My whole point here is that it's important to understand what we're doing here and not pretend that it's legal any more, and to approach our participation in this hobby with your eyes wide open.

As for posting reviews here, a wise man once said...