Are there any reviews of AJ @ the Fox Den? Her pictures look unbelievable. Tried searching but all I get is an error message about too many or too few results. Thanks in advance.
AJ Fox
- Thread starter lkng4somefun
- Start date
I don't remember seeing a review of AJ but I did see her a while back. She is young and is likely close to stated age on CF site. However, I thought her looks (face-wise), is about average especially by Fox standards. Her body did not look her pics - she was more on the stockier side. She is cute though and fits the college type bang on. Overall, she is not a repeat for me. Services was standard with no bbbj (did not inquire MSOG). She also is quite tight which would be a plus for some of you. PM me if you want more details.
Last edited:
I had a session with her also and I concur with Harrington. Her body did not look like her pics....i was a bit disappointed. She also did not allow full daty, only allowed kissing and licking around the region. It might have been because i only got a half hour session. I hope this helps.
So.. what made her look stockier? is she shorter than the stated 5'6" or heavier than the 107lbs??? IMHO 5'6" & 107lbs would be quite petite.Her body did not look her pics - she was more on the stockier side.
lol... those are sp pounds they're talkin' about, not Imperial pounds...So.. what made her look stockier? is she shorter than the stated 5'6" or heavier than the 107lbs??? IMHO 5'6" & 107lbs would be quite petite.
So what would you say is the standard conversion factor from SP to Imperial? Or are we gonna have to go metric too?
I believe she did allow DATY for me and lfk. From what I remembered, her services was standard and don't remember being denied anything that I would expect from a fox session. I would rate her looks about a 7. She is not ugly and has more the cute college look but I would not say she has the major head turner look that would stand right out in a room. She looks a bit heavier when I saw her than what her pics indicate. Personally, I think maybe her pics are airbrushed a bit. Hope this helps.Thanks, Harrington. Did she allow daty? What would you rate her looks as?
not good for CF standard. average looking with heavy bottom ( legs are short and thick ). Her right breast look a little deformed compare to the left side.
Circle you nailed it. I saw her and the right breast felt hard and not right. Agree with Harrington...looks good but wouldn't repeat.not good for CF standard. average looking with heavy bottom ( legs are short and thick ). Her right breast look a little deformed compare to the left side.
This is my 1st post and I'd like to thank all the respectful regulars that post useful reviews.
I saw her about a month ago and I concur with what is above. I picked her because of description but she is definitely heavier than 107lbs. Nice girl , friendly, decent rack , but average looks .....not the spinner I was looking for. would not repeat for the money.
Fox girl bios don't seem to be written by them. I've talked to several girls who said their weight was written falsely. That, coupled with heavily photoshopped pictures can be rather misleading. Take the photos with a pinch of salt and don't expect too much. There are lots of lovely ladies, to be sure, but setting your expectations too high is just going to set you up for some disappointment.I saw her about a month ago and I concur with what is above. I picked her because of description but she is definitely heavier than 107lbs. Nice girl , friendly, decent rack , but average looks .....not the spinner I was looking for. would not repeat for the money.
Personally, I prefer assessing the potential of a fox by looking at the candid shots (the shots that they take when they first get hired) instead of the redone 'glamour' shots. The candid shots are a much better reflection of what the fox really looks like whereas the glamour shots can be touched up/air brushed a bit. Not sure about height and weight, but I know that sometimes the ages of a fox are either misleading or not updated. For instance, if you look at Joelle's profile, it states her age at 22 but her first set of photos were dated 2007 so does that mean she was 18 at the time? I think also sometimes the stats are changed up a bit to help protect the identity of the foxes.Fox girl bios don't seem to be written by them. I've talked to several girls who said their weight was written falsely. That, coupled with heavily photoshopped pictures can be rather misleading. Take the photos with a pinch of salt and don't expect too much. There are lots of lovely ladies, to be sure, but setting your expectations too high is just going to set you up for some disappointment.
