Age

[51shades]

We have seen a lot of revies use the face, body, service and attitude metrics and it is great. Wondering if we should/can add age as the fifth category. Even it may not be accurate, it is a big deciding factor to help fellow pooners screen for the sps that they would like try.

 

[ddcanz]

We have seen a lot of revies use the face, body, service and attitude metrics and it is great. Wondering if we should/can add age as the fifth category. Even it may not be accurate, it is a big deciding factor to help fellow pooners screen for the sps that they would like try.

I agree, but age can be very subjective.
For instance, most of us older guys probably have less of a grasp on the ages of younger women. With me, I might peg a girl between 20-30, or 30-40 and it wouldn't matter. But others- usually younger guys IMO- want to be more definitive. 20-24, 25-28, 29-33 etc.
And with many Asian providers just forget about it.
Too many times the ages in reviews are disputed. Looking down from 55 or up from 20 can make a big difference in how you view a 30-40 y.o. woman.

 

[51shades]

I agree, but age can be very subjective.
For instance, most of us older guys probably have less of a grasp on the ages of younger women. With me, I might peg a girl between 20-30, or 30-40 and it wouldn't matter. But others- usually younger guys IMO- want to be more definitive. 20-24, 25-28, 29-33 etc.
And with many Asian providers just forget about it.
Too many times the ages in reviews are disputed. Looking down from 55 or up from 20 can make a big difference in how you view a 30-40 y.o. woman.

Agreed. It is subjective and can be inaccurate. However, any age range you can provide based on your judgement is better than no information, and can be useful for others. For example, “40 to 50” could help a lot of fellows here make decisions, IMO.