A Lecture from GBM

[Sonny]

Many SW will do BBFS for their standard donation or if offered another green or two. There are some SPs will do BBFS for another brown. Rarely do you find BBFS in a MP, although it has been posted here that it has been the case with a couple located in ***hmo**. So, potentially anyone Perbert does may do BBFS ...the only way to be safe is to wear the hat on the little head, regardless of the situation.

 

[t1163]

Hey Junior Brown!

Grab the bull by the balls - the horns are a little tricky

 

[shak]

I agree that if its fiction and the SP did not provide BBFS, then the reviewer should be banned and the thread removed. However; if it is true then it should stay. Of course, the problem is there is no way to check whether its true or not.

Again, I say right or wrong, fact or fiction, does not matter. What an SP does is at her discretion. Where the problem lies is if the pooner publicly posts that he had bbfs with an SP who he identifies. The public posting of such a highly sensitive act victimizes the SP.

Judging whether the act was fact or fiction is besides the point. Both victimize the SP. If it were fact, then she has a potential health hazard and must live with the dire social consequences of everyone knowing she does something deemed very stupid. If it were fiction, she still has to live with the same social consequences but also defend herself against pooners who will now pressure her to do this very act or other unhealthy acts.

When a pooner posts, why is his focus completely on himself? Should he not also be concerned for the welfare of the SP?

The problem with SP providing BBFS is that, STD is a two way thing. SP providing BBFS not only post a potential health hazard to herself but also to the pooner. Of course, you may argue that everyone who participate in sexual activities must take risk. However; there are different risk categories. I, personally, would place SPs who provide BBFS in a higher risk category than those who play safe. Everyone has different tolerance of risk, I would not see SP who provide BBFS myself, but i am sure some do.

I think when we post, we should be concerned about the welfare of BOTH the pooner and SP, like I said its a two way thing. Only if both the pooner and SP take care of themselve, could we possibly have a "safer" environment.

 

[georgebushmoron]

If it is fact - AND HE DIDN'T GO LOOKING FOR BB FS then we should all know. If this guys goes out looking for BB FS and gets it, then shut the hell up and keep it to yourself, you got what you wanted, what you went searching for, so don't bring down the girl for giving you what you were hunting for - there is a reason why you picked her, and odds are others know about her BB FS reputation and can make the informed choice.

If he didn't go looking for this, and it was offered, then she may be a 'closet' BB FS provider. Someone we all need to know about so that we can make an informed choice. The only other exception I could make to this would be if the client really believed (whether correctly or not) that he had an unique connection with the SP and that this was not proivded to other clients. In that circumstance, it would fall into the keep it to yourself category.

That, my dear GBM is what it is all about, what PERB is here for. Sharing information and about making informed choices.

If the guy is lying, off with his balls! If he is telling the truth, and did not go looking for it, or pushed for it, then the girl should not be surprized / offended that it gets out.

Your argument makes little sense. It is illogical and impractical. Since there is no way to verify whether or not BBFS actually occured, you can not ban based on whether the allegation was fact. So as a policy that you are suggesting, it is completely unrealistic.

Also, you talk about informed choices. If an SP is a BBFS provider should not affect your level of risk. If you use condoms then her even having HIV would have almost zero risk to your health. If you are judging the activity of a provider on her level of risk to determine your own level of risk, it implies you are engaging in highly risky behaviour. And furthermore, you can never know what a provider does with other men despite the postings on this board, so judging the level of risk of a provider by what is said here is absolutely no guarantee of safety. You trust your health to men you have never met before who post things on the internet?? Who's the moron?

My point, which you almost completely chose to ignore, is that posting that an SP gives BBFS is something that hurts her reputation. No claim can be substantiated, so your belief that such a person SHOULD BE OUTED (as some kind of punishment, I presume - or perhaps to an advantage to your pernicious appetite) is allowing heresay to destroy the life of an SP.

 

[georgebushmoron]

any sp for that matter proveds bbfs she's out of her fucking mind and any grief she gets from someone posting that here well it's her own fucking fault.

I agree an SP who provides bbfs is out of her fucking mind. But no claim made by a pooner can be substantiated... it could be a lie. If he lies, or he pressured her into it, then his post is punishing her underservedly. Since there is no way to verify whether or not it was true, and there is damage to the SP from such a posting, why should the posting be allowed?

 

[sdw]

Isn't it time for this thread to be deleted?

The other 2 threads about this subject have been deleted and the lying son of a bitch has already admitted that (s)he never saw the SP, never mind any fantasies that (s)he wrote about services provided.

I must say that the posts about cheap dangerous sex have certainly ensured that I will never poke a foot past the doorframe of any AMP, mini, or MP. Luckily the people who engage in that won't ever want to spend what it costs for safety and quality.

 

[HowieMeeker]

....why should the posting be allowed?

....in case it is true.

This is a tiresome thread but if ANYONE things that ANY SP is not potentially doing BBFS with someone OR that someone she is seeing isn't....then have fun in your naive world. PLAY SAFE.