The next paragraph in the article is:
"The largest category of those legally disenfranchised consists of almost 5 million former felons who have served prison sentences and been deprived of the right to vote under laws that have roots in the post-Civil War 19th century and were aimed at preventing black Americans from voting."
It also states that many people are turned away because they can't prove who they are, no picture ID. Here in WA, it's a simple matter to get a picture ID from the state. The article goes on to cite "facts" based on the 2000 election. Have there been changes in the past four years? It doesn't say. But it does make me wonder who's behind this. Perhaps we should do like Chicago in the "old" days, vote, and often!
After the latest "Dan Rather" gaffe, how much of the "news" can we trust to be the truth? I'm not saying that some or even most of the article is false, but to only give the first line of a lengthy article without any additional information can be misleading.
This story originated from Reuters. If the "facts" in the story turn out to be false or misleading, will they print a correction?
Before I get bashed for being thin skinned, believe me, I have thick skin, I'm just tired of "facts" appearing on the front pages, on TV or on the internet, and when these "facts" turn out to be false, no correction is made.
Keep your stick on the ice. Remember, I'm pulling for you!