L
Larry Storch
Sorry, kinda off topic (again).
I haven't read the book and am not planning upon seeing the movie, but I thought that this was worth a read.
http://www.vancouversun.com/entertainment/movie-guide/Canadian+women+groups+call+Fifty+Shades/10791050/story.html
Being something of a sub, I think people who know very little or are ill informed are not in a position to be telling anyone what they should be doing. Various groups with various agendas/opinions. Of course much of this is a reaction to the movie and the book, but they are applying what they 'think' the facts are to an entire group of well informed people.
I haven't read the book and am not planning upon seeing the movie, but I thought that this was worth a read.
http://www.vancouversun.com/entertainment/movie-guide/Canadian+women+groups+call+Fifty+Shades/10791050/story.html
Being something of a sub, I think people who know very little or are ill informed are not in a position to be telling anyone what they should be doing. Various groups with various agendas/opinions. Of course much of this is a reaction to the movie and the book, but they are applying what they 'think' the facts are to an entire group of well informed people.
Some anti-domestic violence activists and anti-pornography activists — including Antipornography.org, the London Abused Women’s Centre in London, Ont., and the Provincial Association of Transition Houses and Services of Saskatchewan — are calling for a boycott of the movie Fifty Shades of Grey, arguing it promotes violence against women.
However there are legal consequences to consider:And there are others who are horrified either by author E.L. James’s writing or her apparent lack of knowledge about BDSM and who think the book and the movie represent an irresponsible and inaccurate depiction of BDSM. Grey’s predilection for BDSM is “explained” by his abusive childhood, which makes it seem like people who engage in BDSM play only do so because they’re somehow damaged. People in the BDSM community argue that’s not the case.
The Supreme Court has said that a person cannot consent to an assault that causes bodily harm. While the cases have typically arisen in the context of barroom brawls or hockey violence, other courts have applied the same reasoning to the sexual context. So, if a sexual activity causes bodily harm, a person cannot consent to it.
“This is pretty problematic from the perspective of the BDSM community. Carefully negotiated consent is rendered irrelevant, and effectively criminalizes all those who derive sexual pleasure from activities that involve physical pain, if it leaves a mark. But, it’s the law.”