This is an interesting topic with no correct answer...
Here is how I see it. Income is only one factor in affordability and purchasing power. To me, the more important question is how much you spend relative to how much you earn.
In LittleAsianGuys scenario, he puts out $50 or $60K as a benchmark. Lets use the $60K as an example. After you deduct all the legal taxes you should net approximately $36K per year or $3,000 per month in after tax dollars. Now comes the interesting part of the equation – only you can establish how your money is spent and whether you can afford to do any number of things. This is done by determining your priorities. Some people refer to that as making a budget.
First, you have regular re-occurring monthly expenses such as food, hydro, telephone and the like. Most of these expenses can be estimated fairly accurately.
I call the second set of monthly expenses discretionary or optional expenses. These are totally dependent on your personal preference. The question comes down to how much of the $3K p/m do you want to dedicate to items such as clothing, entertainment, vehicle, insurance (car, house and life), vacation, pension, recreation, schooling and of course, pooning. Where I may spend only $100 p/m or less for clothes (a Value Village regular

) the next person might consider that foolish and spend $400 for clothes alone. It all depends on your priorities.
A quick drill down example can reveal a lot about your priorities. Take your re-occurring monthly expenses and minus from your after tax income (i.e. if you spend $600 p/m on food, hydro, cable and telephone – you have $2,400 left to spend on discretionary items). Then establish how much you want to spend on each discretionary item (i.e. vehicle payment $350. p/m; gasoline, maintenance and vehicle insurance $300. p/m; clothing $200 p/m; vacation $100 p/m; pension $100 p/m; recreation $100 p/m; pooning $500 p/m). Once again, only you can assign the actual cost amounts to each of these optional items.
You are correct. We haven’t even looked at housing yet...
No one would argue that purchasing housing in the Greater Vancouver area has a high sticker price. However, a large percentage of single detached homes have suites in them that add to your revenue and allow you to ‘service’ a larger mortgage. Once again, more revenue brings more choice on your priorities. On the other hand, many people feel more comfortable renting and avoiding the normally much larger mortgage payments. This choice allows more $$s to be spent on other priorities.
In the end, everyone can tell you how much they earn – I am not sure how many realize how much they spend and, most importantly, on what… I believe $60K is enough to do pretty well any of your five top priorities (within reason), but little else... I prefer the wiggle room that 100K+ provides
