5 Years is not enough.

[Lets Review]

Burnaby Now Nov. 22
Drug abusers seem to be the real victims, according to the courts.
Sorry if it's been posted already.

 

[Forum mod]

This is a joke. 5 years or 4 years? How about 20? That's attempted murder, nothing less. He then also committed a DUI by his own admission. Plus the other charges. Makes me sick to see the system treat sw's like less than human. 4 years is what you get for shooting at a dog or other animal, not a living, breathing person.

 

[angry anderson]

Fucking cunt. Lucky for him we don't have laws in Canada.
Like the other "refugee" who raped and killed the 13 year old in Burnaby. Case has been dragging on for how long now? Says he might have raped her but somebody else must have killed her.
I guess she was just having a bad day.

 

[wincity23]

This actually has me curious. Regardless of any additional info, one truth is evident-the victim being a SW has heavily influenced this case. Upon first reading, I was flabbergasted as to how he wasn’t charged, and convicted, with attempted murder. Intoxication isn’t a defense for that. However, the video evidence has to have shown something to counter that. That can be the only explanation. Otherwise, the entire crown is at risk of being exposed as prejudicial towards the victim(S). Seriously, if he shoots a tinder match on the same grounds-her pics were faked-are we seeing the same legal result? Shameful.

 

[Cock Throppled]

Absolutely disgusting. The prosecution should be asking for minimum 15 years, if not more. THe fact they only asked for 5 shows how dysfunctional the justice industry has become.

And how about Avis - charging a shooting victim eight grand for daring to bleed from her gunshot wound.

 

[wincity23]

Absolutely disgusting. The prosecution should be asking for minimum 15 years, if not more. THe fact they only asked for 5 shows how dysfunctional the justice industry has become.

And how about Avis - charging a shooting victim eight grand for daring to bleed from her gunshot wound.

you think that’s bad? I guarantee you Avis went after the client for the 7k and double dipped and filed an insurance claim knowing they’d get paid once, hopefully twice.

 

[rlock]

It's a weird phenomenon, where prosecutors would rather go in with the defense to make a "joint recommendation" just to close the case, than fight for a sentence that's actually not a joke.
This is just one instance of it, but there are dozens every year.

Usually it involves some version of telling the victims of a crime (or their next of kin) to basically go fuck themselves.

 

[grusse]

Fucking cunt. Lucky for him we don't have laws in Canada.
Like the other "refugee" who raped and killed the 13 year old in Burnaby. Case has been dragging on for how long now? Says he might have raped her but somebody else must have killed her.
I guess she was just having a bad day.

Sure is nice that diversity is working so well.

 

[80watts]

Well what I don't get is a 45 year old man running home to mommy and daddy..... Probably the same people who drove him to drugs in the first place...
Drugs are not an excuse for shooting a person in the back.
Even the fact that he had a illegal hand gun is speaking volumes....Criminal. And should get 5 just for possessing a illegal handgun, used in a crime, let alone a shooting where you shot someone. When you point a gun at anyone, it means you are going to shoot and kill. That's intent to kill, people watch to many fucken movies with garbage hype scene with a gun in hand.... Reality is alot different.

I remember years ago some one saying that most east indian families spoilt their sons who get away with murder and had very strick rules for their daughters. Not a cultural thing, but really bad parenting.... This guys ego is beyond large, getting an escort to your house while your wife and kid were sleeping. I hope the wife divorces him, but hey the parents probably own the house....
Without a gun in jail, he will become some bitch boy in jail. Karma will get him..... The only thing this guy is sorry about is that he got caught and public shame to his family's name.

With such a lite sentence to be handed down, you have to wonder if there is any shennaigans happening with this case... Something smells rotten with this one.

 

[marchmadness]

A child who was never raised turns into a man who can buy guns and drugs and sex.

The inability to control one's behavior should be met with the harshest punishment.

Well what I don't get is a 45 year old man running home to mommy and daddy..... Probably the same people who drove him to drugs in the first place...
Drugs are not an excuse for shooting a person in the back.
Even the fact that he had a illegal hand gun is speaking volumes....Criminal. And should get 5 just for possessing a illegal handgun, used in a crime, let alone a shooting where you shot someone. When you point a gun at anyone, it means you are going to shoot and kill. That's intent to kill, people watch to many fucken movies with garbage hype scene with a gun in hand.... Reality is alot different.

I remember years ago some one saying that most east indian families spoilt their sons who get away with murder and had very strick rules for their daughters. Not a cultural thing, but really bad parenting.... This guys ego is beyond large, getting an escort to your house while your wife and kid were sleeping. I hope the wife divorces him, but hey the parents probably own the house....
Without a gun in jail, he will become some bitch boy in jail. Karma will get him..... The only thing this guy is sorry about is that he got caught and public shame to his family's name.

With such a lite sentence to be handed down, you have to wonder if there is any shennaigans happening with this case... Something smells rotten with this one.

 

[frisky business]

. . . one truth is evident-the victim being a SW has heavily influenced this case . . .

.
.
Ya I think so too. Can you imagine if the crime scene was Shaughnessy or the British Properties and the victim was a high profile and well respected member of the community? It would have been a totally different case.

I remember a while ago reading about a case of a guy who raped a SW and the guy's defence argued that due to the victim's line of work the crime should be treated as theft not a sexual assault. The judge rejected the argument, ruling (I'm paraphrasing): a sex worker is entitled to the same protection under the law as anyone else.

Perhaps the Crown Counsel who asked for only five years was absent the day they taught that important precedent in law school.
.
.

 

[rlock]

On top of this case, there was the recent one where the judge gave some secret-camera peeper a suspended sentence because (judge's words) he was deprived of marital intimacy.

Fucking cunt. Lucky for him we don't have laws in Canada.
Like the other "refugee" who raped and killed the 13 year old in Burnaby. Case has been dragging on for how long now? Says he might have raped her but somebody else must have killed her.
I guess she was just having a bad day.

Oh, it gets worse. The forensic rape expert the police brought in to testify in the case did her testimony for the prosecution in court, but then she was found mysteriouly dead in a wooded park too.
So as a result of being too unalive to cross-examine, the court threw out ALL her testimony in the case. VERY suspicious.
(One other fun fact about this case: since the trial started, people are barred from saying the victim's name: Marissa Shen, even though everyone knew it before.)

As you say, the defendant offers no explanation for how his cum ended up inside the vagina of a dead little girl. His defense lawyers also tried insinuating the mother was to blame, or the girl was just being an underage slut, or the girl somehow killed herself by strangulation. Basically just throwing conspiracy theories at the jury and hoping that at least one of them is gullible enough to buy into these unreasonable doubts.

It's sick. If this scumbag gets away with it, it will be the worst travesty of justice since Karla Homolka. People will want to burn the whole legal system down.

Sure is nice that diversity is working so well.

So, it's not that he did drugs or had a gun, but his brown skin? I guess white folks never rape or murder anyone. Willie Pickton must have been secretly something else.

 

[grusse]

On top of this case, there was the recent one where the judge gave some secret-camera peeper a suspended sentence because (judge's words) he was deprived of marital intimacy.





Oh, it gets worse. The forensic rape expert the police brought in to testify in the case did her testimony for the prosecution in court, but then she was found mysteriouly dead in a wooded park too.
So as a result of being too unalive to cross-examine, the court threw out ALL her testimony in the case. VERY suspicious.
(One other fun fact about this case: since the trial started, people are barred from saying the victim's name: Marissa Shen, even though everyone knew it before.)

As you say, the defendant offers no explanation for how his cum ended up inside the vagina of a dead little girl. His defense lawyers also tried insinuating the mother was to blame, or the girl was just being an underage slut, or the girl somehow killed herself by strangulation. Basically just throwing conspiracy theories at the jury and hoping that at least one of them is gullible enough to buy into these unreasonable doubts.

It's sick. If this scumbag gets away with it, it will be the worst travesty of justice since Karla Homolka. People will want to burn the whole legal system down.




So, it's not that he did drugs or had a gun, but his brown skin? I guess white folks never rape or murder anyone. Willie Pickton must have been secretly something else.

Don't strain yourself on your Stradivarious lol.

 

[angry anderson]

On top of this case, there was the recent one where the judge gave some secret-camera peeper a suspended sentence because (judge's words) he was deprived of marital intimacy.





Oh, it gets worse. The forensic rape expert the police brought in to testify in the case did her testimony for the prosecution in court, but then she was found mysteriouly dead in a wooded park too.
So as a result of being too unalive to cross-examine, the court threw out ALL her testimony in the case. VERY suspicious.
(One other fun fact about this case: since the trial started, people are barred from saying the victim's name: Marissa Shen, even though everyone knew it before.)

As you say, the defendant offers no explanation for how his cum ended up inside the vagina of a dead little girl. His defense lawyers also tried insinuating the mother was to blame, or the girl was just being an underage slut, or the girl somehow killed herself by strangulation. Basically just throwing conspiracy theories at the jury and hoping that at least one of them is gullible enough to buy into these unreasonable doubts.

It's sick. If this scumbag gets away with it, it will be the worst travesty of justice since Karla Homolka. People will want to burn the whole legal system down.




So, it's not that he did drugs or had a gun, but his brown skin? I guess white folks never rape or murder anyone. Willie Pickton must have been secretly something else.

"So, it's not that he did drugs or had a gun, but his brown skin? I guess white folks never rape or murder anyone. Willie Pickton must have been secretly something else."
Point might be made that he was newly arrived in Canada for 3 months or something. Nice fresh start and nod of gratitude to your host country.

 

[julius1980]

Oh, it gets worse. The forensic rape expert the police brought in to testify in the case did her testimony for the prosecution in court, but then she was found mysteriouly dead in a wooded park too.

When I read the news about this, it does not seem mysterious at all. While the article does not explicitly mention suicide, I think it's using journalism code for suicide:

Dr. Tracy Pickett death puts sex-assault testimony in limbo at Burnaby murder trial

My own brother took his life at age 38. It's not that uncommon or mysterious.

 

[rlock]

When I read the news about this, it does not seem mysterious at all. While the article does not explicitly mention suicide, I think it's using journalism code for suicide:

Dr. Tracy Pickett death puts sex-assault testimony in limbo at Burnaby murder trial

My own brother took his life at age 38. It's not that uncommon or mysterious.

Yes, I suppose people do not trust a finding of "no foul play" when they hear it; police are so cagey about elaborating that it recalls other cases where police may have simply ignored signs of foul play.
The fact her death helps the accused though, by some weird technicality, and the fact that her death mirrors that of M*riss& Sh*n's is very triggering to people who have little trust in the courts.

You'd think the police & prosecutors would immediately summon another espert to replace her and re-confirm what was found before, not just allow the judge to throw the whole thing out so arbitrarily.

The accused in this case has wrapped up today with his defense offering no defense at all. They claim not guilty, but offer zero evidence to back it up, so that none of it can be challenged by prosecutors. They do not (can not) deny that the defendant's cum was found inside her 13 year old body, or that she died of strangulation. They just assert that these two facts do not point to him raping and murdering her.

What the defense did do was insinuate that the girl's mother was arguing with the girl, or that the girl was suicidal, or that the little girl was picking up some random dude in Central Park for sex, and even somehow strangled herself.
Classic victim blaming dirty tricks, hoping one or more jurors are "conspiracy theory" types, who do not grasp the "reasonable" part of reasonable doubt. And the odds of this strategy working would be low, but now the jury is (by judge's ruling) not allowed to consider the forensic rape expert's testimony at all. Those are not encouraging developments.

Either the jury acquits because one or more of them are mentally defective, or they do convict, but the judge rules they considered factual evidence that should have been redacted ? Not a good omen.