OLYMPIC ???? companionship service and rates increase?

[uncleg]

Typically everybody is on about the money.
What about the risk factor?

From the SP side of the business, you're going to be dealing with alot of
"strangers" clients from countries where they have a very different view of this industry and the people in it. In some it will be a normal profession and you will be treated accordingly, in others you're going to get treated like shit, but the clients will feel they have a right to do so. Then there's the possibility of violence. Somebody leaving the country within 24 to 48 hours is less likely to be concerned about getting caught then somebody that lives here.

From the pooner end of the business, possibly a new crop of SP's.
If they are locals taking the opportunity to get into the business, great, but what about the visiting team ? What are they carrying that you really don't want to share ? Again the violence factor, it's not like they'll be around to catch once they clean you out.

All in all, I'd think sticking to the locals on both sides will be probably be the safest and most beneficial for all concerned.

 

[VANCOUVER~EROTIC]

Typically everybody is on about the money.
What about the risk factor?

From the SP side of the business, you're going to be dealing with alot of
"strangers" clients from countries where they have a very different view of this industry and the people in it. In some it will be a normal profession and you will be treated accordingly, in others you're going to get treated like shit, but the clients will feel they have a right to do so. Then there's the possibility of violence. Somebody leaving the country within 24 to 48 hours is less likely to be concerned about getting caught then somebody that lives here.

From the pooner end of the business, possibly a new crop of SP's.
If they are locals taking the opportunity to get into the business, great, but what about the visiting team ? What are they carrying that you really don't want to share ? Again the violence factor, it's not like they'll be around to catch once they clean you out.

All in all, I'd think sticking to the locals on both sides will be probably be the safest and most beneficial for all concerned.

very nice post

 

[VANCOUVER~EROTIC]

Hmm...
the "after" event eh?

Well I wonder how many of our SP's have actually given any thought to that?

What happens after Mach 2010 when all the money in the city dries up & Vancouver begins to feel the FULL weight of this economic recession?

There's been lot's of denial here about the economy that the rest of our country has certainly been feeling for over half a year now.

this is what i am talking about the AFTER EVENT and very happy to see other think about it too.

 

[JFF009]

It's for the tank of gas it's going to cost me to sit in bridge traffic ! I live outside of Vancouver. By that time my rate will be $280*, so it'll be $300. A better number than $280 anyway imo**

*Yes I'm planning on a slight rate raise when I heal from surgery, but this is in part because I'm choosing to see less clients per week. I apologise for this inconvenience but I promise the new boobs and the awesome tummy and my amazing boost in self confidence make it well worth 30 bucks

**My massage/R&T rates probably aren't changing.

No hijacking was done...it is good discussion.

I had a laugh at the bridge traffic comment...I hate that crap.

This is not meant to be a discussion about regular rates because I think that ones been beaten to death. IMHO the ladies are worth whatever they wish to charge. Nice to see the R&T comment though...it is my fave.

Back to the Olympics though I agree with some of the comments about the potential of the post-Olympic awakening in Vancouver. It will be real interesting to see where the global economy is by then and what happens locally. We have been somewhat sheltered from the same level of impact that other regions have had. Some of that due to the Olympics but also because we are not entirely reliant on export to survive.

Advice to the ladies...get the $$$ while you can during the games. You're businesswomen first, market yourselves well and have some fun making some serious coin.

 

[triplegun]

Typically everybody is on about the money.
What about the risk factor?

From the SP side of the business, you're going to be dealing with alot of
"strangers" clients from countries where they have a very different view of this industry and the people in it. In some it will be a normal profession and you will be treated accordingly, in others you're going to get treated like shit, but the clients will feel they have a right to do so. Then there's the possibility of violence. Somebody leaving the country within 24 to 48 hours is less likely to be concerned about getting caught then somebody that lives here.

From the pooner end of the business, possibly a new crop of SP's.
If they are locals taking the opportunity to get into the business, great, but what about the visiting team ? What are they carrying that you really don't want to share ? Again the violence factor, it's not like they'll be around to catch once they clean you out.

All in all, I'd think sticking to the locals on both sides will be probably be the safest and most beneficial for all concerned.

i totally agree the people coming wont care what they do and someone will more likely get hurt durning that time.you clients will be better than some guy willing to pay more that you have never met before the risks out way the gain

 

[VANCOUVER~EROTIC]

here some usefull info i guess
for the one use downtown hotel , here some alternative where
we can attract some business in case of the rates of an nice hotel are too high downtown.

outside of the downtown the rates going to be more lower ,
so give us the chance to be able to provide incall during olympics at raisonable rates
https://perb.cc/vbulletin/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=1318

hope this help and thanks again to all for your input pm and suggestion.

John

 

[FortunateOne]

Just a note here, selling sexual services is not completely "legal".

More like the laws are not enforced here, thus the trade is relatively worry free.

I know most people don't bother to read all your multi-quoted rhetoric, but what exactly do you mean by this? Very confusing, considering the sale of sexual services in Canada is legal, which part of it could possibly be illegal?

 

[Krustee]

I know most people don't bother to read all your multi-quoted rhetoric, but what exactly do you mean by this? Very confusing, considering the sale of sexual services in Canada is legal, which part of it could possibly be illegal?

Earning a living though the sale of sexual services is illegal!

Propositioning sex for a fee is illegal.

Discussing in public, sex for money, is illegal.


What do you not understand about that?

 

[FortunateOne]

Earning a living though the sale of sexual services is illegal!

Propositioning sex for a fee is illegal.

Discussing in public, sex for money, is illegal.


What do you not understand about that?

What is it you don't understand about the question? How do you consider this illegal in Canada? Prove to me that the exchange of sexual services for money is illegal. Because that, not discussing in public or propositioning, is what you said.

selling sexual services is not completely "legal"

You want to reinterpret your own words, go ahead. But answer the question first, instead of acting dumb. We already know you aren't too bright. Don't have to prove it.

 

[Krustee]

What is it you don't understand about the question? How do you consider this illegal in Canada? Prove to me that the exchange of sexual services for money is illegal. Because that, not discussing in public or propositioning, is what you said.

selling sexual services is not completely "legal"

You want to reinterpret your own words, go ahead. But answer the question first, instead of acting dumb. We already know you aren't too bright. Don't have to prove it.

If you cannot see the trap those other laws make for being allowed to legally sell sex services then I do not think you have the IQ to comprehend this matter.

Try thinking rather than attempting to look smart by asking shallow & naive questions.

Lemme guess - you don't play chess?



Your hubris is humorous!

 

[FortunateOne]

If you cannot see the trap those other laws make for being allowed to legally sell sex services then I do not think you have the IQ to comprehend this matter.

Try thinking rather than attempting to look smart by asking shallow & naive questions.

Lemme guess - you don't play chess?



Your hubris is humorous!

What "trap". The other laws are fairly transparent, pretty difficult to get "trapped" lol. The other laws also have nothing to do with the question: explain how "selling sexual services is illegal". The actual act itself, not how you got there. Why is it difficult for you to comprehend something you yourself said?

I shouldn't have to try to interpret what you meant by what you said. Why not just admit you were wrong to say what you said? Your attempts to avoid an explanation are lame.

Um, playing chess doesn't make a wrong statement right, btw.

 

[Krustee]

What "trap". The other laws are fairly transparent, pretty difficult to get "trapped" lol. The other laws also have nothing to do with the question: explain how "selling sexual services is illegal". The actual act itself, not how you got there. Why is it difficult for you to comprehend something you yourself said?

I shouldn't have to try to interpret what you meant by what you said. Why not just admit you were wrong to say what you said? Your attempts to avoid an explanation are lame.

Um, playing chess doesn't make a wrong statement right, btw.

Jeeeezus woman!!!

I've met 5 year olds with more intuitive reasoning skills than you!

The fact that you STILL cannot put 2 & 2 together here reveals some disturbing truths about you!

1 - Canadian law does say you are legally allowed to trade sex for money.

I am not disputing that.

2 - The fact that you are not legally allowed to earn an income from selling sex is what's the catch.

Sorry you are too dense to comprehend how that impacts your chosen profession.

3 - What this clearly indicates & something that I have stated too many times to count before, is that YOU & those like you, do NOT file taxes!

That... or

You LIE about your occupation.

So which is it FO?

 

[Annalise Lane]

Jeeeezus woman!!!

I've met 5 year olds with more intuitive reasoning skills than you!

The fact that you STILL cannot put 2 & 2 together here reveals some disturbing truths about you!

1 - Canadian law does say you are legally allowed to trade sex for money.

I am not disputing that.

2 - The fact that you are not legally allowed to earn an income from selling sex is what's the catch.

Sorry you are too dense to comprehend how that impacts your chosen profession.

3 - What this clearly indicates & something that I have stated too many times to count before, is that YOU & those like you, do NOT file taxes!

That... or

You LIE about your occupation.

So which is it FO?

Please show us where in the criminal code this is stated !!

More girls should file their taxes because without doing so they will have a hard time buying a car, home or get a basic cc for travelling.

 

[Krustee]

Please show us where in the criminal code this is stated !!

More girls should file their taxes because without doing so they will have a hard time buying a car, home or get a basic cc for travelling.

Are you sure you want to have me point this out to you?

Once I post it, all who read it are legally informed, indictable & therefore subject to prosecution under the law. (you cannot claim ignorance)

Would you not just prefer to believe anything Fortunate One tells you & follow that trite little Pied Piper down the path of judicial judgment & a potential invitation to stay in a four star Federal hotel?

Is FO not the one who comes to the rescue to all those poor SP's who I so villainously harass & stalk & denigrate & belittle & question & abuse & harangue & snicker at?
I bet her next accusation is that I helped 'Willie' fertilize his pig farm several years ago.
But I am quite sure she will not stop until she can get me indicted as an international terrorist who has single handedly massacred ten times more people than Hitler!

It's all true because FO says so!

TRUST HER!!!

In the words of an authority on the subject, John Lowman, in Canada "the legality of prostitution is rhetorical at best."

 

[island-guy]

Actually the trick is that it is illegal to publically solicit, and it is illegal to live off the proceeds of prostitution. It is also illegal to operate a bawdy house.

Now, the living off the proceeds part as far as I know, has never been APPLIED to the SPs themselves, but rather to pimps, drivers, MP owners, etc

But technically, it could be applied to the SPs.

As far as the tax evasion angle goes, my guess is that about 50% of all those really in the sex trade do NOT report their income, and many of those collect welfare cheques.

Of the other 50%, probably half of them report a completely different income and do not report their 2nd income (strippers who SP on the side for example).

Of the maybe 25% who do report SP income, given that it is a cash business, probably NONE of them report ALL their income. They may report some fraction of it but the odds that they report every dollar are slim to none.

 

[Thatotherguy]

Jeeeezus woman!!!

I've met 5 year olds with more intuitive reasoning skills than you!

The fact that you STILL cannot put 2 & 2 together here reveals some disturbing truths about you!

1 - Canadian law does say you are legally allowed to trade sex for money.

I am not disputing that.

Umm, you might want to go back and re-read what you yourself wrote. As a matter of fact, you did dispute that. If that's not what you meant, then that's not what you should have said. Somehow you can't quite seem to understand that the activities surrounding the sale of sex might not be completely legal, but that doesn't make the sale of sex itself illegal (which is what you stated). And you're complaining about Fortunateone's intelligence...

 

[Krustee]

Umm, you might want to go back and re-read what you yourself wrote.

I am well aware of what I wrote.
I said it was not completely legal.
The operative word here being completely.

As a matter of fact, you did dispute that.
If that's not what you meant, then that's not what you should have said.

Just because you fail to grasp what I intended does not mean I am obligated to write my commentary differently.

The sale of sex is not illegal, however, there are a myriad of catch 22 laws that make it nearly impossible to transact that sale without breaking one of those laws.

Now that I have stated it such that a 3rd grader could understand, is my original statement a little more clear?

Somehow you can't quite seem to understand that the activities surrounding the sale of sex might not be completely legal, but that doesn't make the sale of sex itself illegal (which is what you stated).

As I stated above the operative word is completely.

If the government says it's OK for you to breath but it is illegal to take oxygen from the air, what's the use of breathing?

And you're complaining about Fortunateone's intelligence...

Not complaining about something of which she seems to be deficient in.
Just complaining that she attempts to correct me when she does not even understand the subject matter.

 

[FortunateOne]

Now that I have stated it such that a 3rd grader could understand, is my original statement a little more clear?

Who cares what you claim now you "intended" to say. You didn't say that, you were wrong, and now you are trying to backpedal and defend yourself by attacking anyone who points it out. Who cares about the side laws that make the activity more difficult -- it has nothing to do with what you actually said. Everyone already knows about these; they are questioning what you meant when you posted because that contradicts the facts. That is why you are being questioned on that and that alone.

You still have failed to answer the question, inspite of increasing the rhetoric, name calling, deliberately misleading statements, and trying to save pathetic comments. Everyone can see what you wrote; it was either deliberately misleading or a deliberate lie. If it wasn't what you intended to say, oh well, too late.

You might as well dig a little deeper and post your so-called proof, if it truly exists you should have no problem "exposing" it to all. Calling other people stupid, I guess, is your way of feeling superior and smarter than everyone else. If you were smarter, you would see the dripping sarcasm and flagrant nose-thumbing directed your way. Apparently you have a finely developed sense of humour, in fact many of your posts are meant to be "funny", isn't that right?

Really, I only do this in your reviews:

Is FO not the one who comes to the rescue to all those poor SP's who I so villainously harass & stalk & denigrate & belittle & question & abuse & harangue & snicker at?

Oh, that's right. You don't post reviews. Or, the few you did were so offensive that the community at large rose up against you. (Oh, and got you banned?) Hmm, that's saying a lot when considering this is perb and negative reviews are considered a-okay. No, no reviews, you just make sweeping generalizations about all sps and call it fact because you've seen so so many, and many of them are your closest and dearest friends, but in spite of that you prefer to paint all escorts and sex workers as drug-addicted uneducated non-contributing members of society, including this little community.

 

[wilde]

Who cares what you claim now you "intended" to say. You didn't say that, you were wrong, and now you are trying to backpedal and defend yourself by attacking anyone who points it out.......

Same shit, different day eh?

.

 

[VANCOUVER~EROTIC]

What About We Go Back To The Post #31 :d

i totally agree the people coming wont care what they do and someone will more likely get hurt durning that time.you clients will be better than some guy willing to pay more that you have never met before the risks out way the gain

this can be nice

i feel better now