PERB In Need of Banner

British police officer stabbed to death on the street.

Thatotherguy

Active member
Jan 31, 2008
1,132
12
38
Batons and taser, no mention of pepper spray. And if it went thru a stab proof vest it was far from being a little exacto knife.
First, if a taser didn't stop the guy, are you really stupid enough to think that pepper spray would have? Second, try again with your reading comprehension. Nowhere in that story did it say that he was stabbed through a stab proof vest. Just that he was stabbed and killed while wearing a stab proof vest. By far the most likely conclusion is that he was stabbed somewhere that the vest didn't cover. Like his neck, perhaps. So tell me again how a cop facing a guy with a knife should just hit him in the leg with a baton...

Oh and for the record, I hate being in a position where I agree with wess.
 

Thatotherguy

Active member
Jan 31, 2008
1,132
12
38

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
First, if a taser didn't stop the guy, are you really stupid enough to think that pepper spray would have? Second, try again with your reading comprehension. Nowhere in that story did it say that he was stabbed through a stab proof vest. Just that he was stabbed and killed while wearing a stab proof vest. By far the most likely conclusion is that he was stabbed somewhere that the vest didn't cover. Like his neck, perhaps. So tell me again how a cop facing a guy with a knife should just hit him in the leg with a baton...

Oh and for the record, I hate being in a position where I agree with wess.
Ok READ MY POST AGAIN ASSHOLE!
And if it went thru a stab proof vest it was far from being a little exacto knife.
KEYWORD:IF IF IT WENT THROUGH IF AS IN MAY HAVE OR MAY NOT HAVE.

The british incident the guy was obviously aggitated and the officer was BY HIMSELF. The vancouver incident was 2 vs 1 and we dont know for sure if he was aggitated or not. They killed the video but based on previous things like the Braidwood inquiry. The officers say 1 thing, the video shows otherwise.
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
Hey wait a minute wess, this didn't just happen. This happened almost 2 years ago! The point (that lightbearer is full of shit when he says a cop facing a guy with a knife shouldn't shoot) is still valid, but please get your facts straight.
1 on 1 a cop should use his gun. 2 on 1 like we saw here 2 days ago they could have tried the baton option before the gun.

Is that too hard to comprehend?
 

wess

New member
Jan 5, 2009
613
2
0
Hey wait a minute wess, this didn't just happen. This happened almost 2 years ago! The point (that lightbearer is full of shit when he says a cop facing a guy with a knife shouldn't shoot) is still valid, but please get your facts straight.
Fuck, I assumed it was current because the story is on yahoo news right now. Anyway it proves that cops have every rite to shoot if they are being threatened. Lightbearer is just worried that he might be shot at an alex jones freak show rally.
 

Thatotherguy

Active member
Jan 31, 2008
1,132
12
38
Ok READ MY POST AGAIN ASSHOLE!
And if it went thru a stab proof vest it was far from being a little exacto knife.
KEYWORD:IF IF IT WENT THROUGH IF AS IN MAY HAVE OR MAY NOT HAVE.

The british incident the guy was obviously aggitated and the officer was BY HIMSELF. The vancouver incident was 2 vs 1 and we dont know for sure if he was aggitated or not. They killed the video but based on previous things like the Braidwood inquiry. The officers say 1 thing, the video shows otherwise.
Again you fail at basic reading comprehension:
BBC news said:
He attended in a marked police car and was with a number of other officers when he was attacked.
Tell me again how when it's 2 vs 1 it's safe for an officer to take down a knife-wielding man with a baton... Hell, in the case in Luton it was at least 3 cops (since the cop who was killed was with a number of other officers at the time) vs. one guy with a knife. So please do explain how you're not talking out of your ass.
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
Fuck, I assumed it was current because the story is on yahoo news right now. Anyway it proves that cops have every rite to shoot if they are being threatened. Lightbearer is just worried that he might be shot at an alex jones freak show rally.
You get lamer by the day....
 

Thatotherguy

Active member
Jan 31, 2008
1,132
12
38
You get lamer by the day....
What's the matter lightbearer? Backed yourself into a corner with your idiotic "2 vs 1 should use a baton" and can't think of a way to get out of it now that you know that it was 3 or more vs 1 and the cop using a baton still got killed? :rolleyes:
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
What's the matter lightbearer? Backed yourself into a corner with your idiotic "2 vs 1 should use a baton" and can't think of a way to get out of it now that you know that it was 3 or more vs 1 and the cop using a baton still got killed? :rolleyes:
That article barrely gave any details they arrived and he got stabbed, what happened in between. And I doubt it was a little exacto knife.... But they did try to restrain him, but did he still have the knife?
 

smackyo

pimp supreme
May 18, 2005
1,636
4
0
your mom says hi.
just to point something out. it doesn't say that they TRIED to restrain him with those methods. it says "Officers used a baton round and Taser electric stun gun to restrain the knifeman."

they could be talking about after the fact. i'm not saying that for sure they are but it might be and you could be reading into it too early. it does not say officers ATTEMPTED to restrain the knifeman using such and such. it said "Officers used a baton round and Taser electric stun gun TO RESTRAIN the knifeman.".

bit of a difference in the wording.
 

Thatotherguy

Active member
Jan 31, 2008
1,132
12
38
That article barrely gave any details they arrived and he got stabbed, what happened in between. And I doubt it was a little exacto knife....
And you're really dumb enough to think that an x-acto knife to the carotid artery won't kill you just as dead as a bigger knife to the same spot? Face it. It's been proved that you're a moron for saying that a cop should just hit a knife-wielding man with a baton.

The cop who was killed in this story had the knife-wielder outnumbered at least 3 to 1, they tasered him, the cop was wearing a stab-proof vest, he used his baton, and he still got killed! So the female VPD members who had fewer numbers on their side, who may or may not have been wearing stab-proof vests, and who didn't have tasers really should have just hit their knife-wielder with a baton. Because come on, nothing bad could have happened to them. :rolleyes: I mean it's not like if you go up against a guy with a knife in close quarters you almost always get cut... Oh wait, anyone who has faced a guy with knife will tell you differently. Anyone with any hand-to-hand training will tell you differently.

But don't worry, based on your completely unrealistic self-defense advice, we all still believe that you've got 2 blackbelts. :rolleyes:
 

Thatotherguy

Active member
Jan 31, 2008
1,132
12
38
just to point something out. it doesn't say that they TRIED to restrain him with those methods. it says "Officers used a baton round and Taser electric stun gun to restrain the knifeman."

they could be talking about after the fact. i'm not saying that for sure they are but it might be and you could be reading into it too early. it does not say officers ATTEMPTED to restrain the knifeman using such and such. it said "Officers used a baton round and Taser electric stun gun TO RESTRAIN the knifeman.".

bit of a difference in the wording.
Hmm, that's true. Actually reading it again, that probably is describing how they restrained him after he had already stabbed the cop.

Of course, that doesn't change the fact that it's incredibly stupid to try to take down a knife-wielding man using a baton if you have a ranged option available.
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
Hmm, that's true. Actually reading it again, that probably is describing how they restrained him after he had already stabbed the cop.

Of course, that doesn't change the fact that it's incredibly stupid to try to take down a knife-wielding man using a baton if you have a ranged option available.
Well you hit them first hopefull you can hit the arm holding the weapon and they drop it. If they don't or continue then you should shoot them, the baton wasn't a clear enough message. But it depends on the situation sometimes you have time to tell suspect to stop others you have to react right away.
 

smackyo

pimp supreme
May 18, 2005
1,636
4
0
your mom says hi.
Hmm, that's true. Actually reading it again, that probably is describing how they restrained him after he had already stabbed the cop.

Of course, that doesn't change the fact that it's incredibly stupid to try to take down a knife-wielding man using a baton if you have a ranged option available.

i agree. someone with a knife i think is the perfect time for a less lethal method like a taser. if a taser is not available on any officer present and the officer is being charged at or lunged at with a knife then i think its reasonable to use a gun.

i can see the argument that lightbearer is trying to make but i think a baton is unrealistic. getting close with a baton you can still get swiped on the arm or something and who knows what the hell is on that blade. could be blood from someone else that happens to be hiv or hep infected.

who knows???

this situation could have played out with the deceased officer stabbed by the man after an in close struggle after which other officers arrived to restrain the man. but i wasn't there so who knows?

the way they word it to me makes it sound like the taser worked in restraining the man albeit a bit too late unfortunately.
 

ysoenglish

New member
Mar 4, 2008
16
0
0
This is off the BBC, it just happend.Notice how the tazer and the batons and the pepper spray failed.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/6740063.stm
If I infer your hypothesis correctly - that the use of firearms makes policing safer - then you should think through your argument more thoroughly.

Of some 160,000 polce officers in GB only about 6000 are authorised in the use of firearms and in the last decade or so only about 10-20,000 incidents a year are attended by officers with firearms. Police injury statistics are, however, quite low, years go by without an officer fatality in the line of duty - and this includes car accidents, I believe the most common cause of officer fatality in most first world countries. The armed British police have, however, shot quite a few people, many unarmed and one naked in bed.

I don't have the determinaton to source all the statistics to do a detailed comparison of Canadian and British policing and injury rates but my guess is that Canadian injury rates are slightly higher after appropriate normalization. I would suggest your post undermines your own hypothesis.

On a wider point, in most of these types of discussions no-one seems to have sufficient information to get even close to a rational or intelligent interpretation of the events and the ethical and moral philosophising is generally atrocious, as in inconsistent, illogical or self-contradictory, so what is it that motivates these discussions?
 

Thatotherguy

Active member
Jan 31, 2008
1,132
12
38
Well you hit them first hopefull you can hit the arm holding the weapon and they drop it. If they don't or continue then you should shoot them, the baton wasn't a clear enough message.
Again spoken like somebody who has absolutely no understanding of how fast these things can play out. If you don't swing first and hit the weapon out of his hand on the first hit (and don't think I don't notice that you're quietly changing your tune from "hit him on the leg") then you're getting cut. End of story. And 90% of the time even if you're well trained, you're not going to disarm the guy with your first swing.

So basically, if your first swing doesn't do it, you're fucked. You might still be able to take him down, but you're going to get cut, and there's no way you'll have time to change your mind and shoot him after the first swing of the baton doesn't work. Or are you relying on the guy with the knife to not try to stab/slash you, and to give you plenty of time to back off and draw your gun?

Tell me again about your 2 blackbelts... :rolleyes:
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
Again spoken like somebody who has absolutely no understanding of how fast these things can play out. If you don't swing first and hit the weapon out of his hand on the first hit (and don't think I don't notice that you're quietly changing your tune from "hit him on the leg") then you're getting cut. End of story. And 90% of the time even if you're well trained, you're not going to disarm the guy with your first swing.

So basically, if your first swing doesn't do it, you're fucked. You might still be able to take him down, but you're going to get cut, and there's no way you'll have time to change your mind and shoot him after the first swing of the baton doesn't work. Or are you relying on the guy with the knife to not try to stab/slash you, and to give you plenty of time to back off and draw your gun?

Tell me again about your 2 blackbelts... :rolleyes:
Go re read my post. Quit twisting everything I say like Hank does....
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts