Still needs a lot of work -- the screens won't scroll -- can't see what's at the bottom of the screen, and once the menu choices (e.g., "Attendants) float away to the right there's no way to click on them -- have to start over at the "enter" screen.
You are right, on my laptop (still pretty new), running at 1280 x 800, the bottom gets cut off. The Flash content on the main page is 1300 x 916, which means the website will not work right unless your monitor resolution is
at least 1280 x 1024 (not everybody has a fancy monitor).
It's obvious that the guy who created the website is not very good. Heavy reliance on Flash. Unnecessary use of a popup window to load the main page. Poor navigation within the Flash content itself (as Hank already mentioned). Failure to test site using multiple browsers (doesn't work correctly on Safari). The schedule was placed on yet another separate popup page which the Firefox popup blocker prevents from opening. Plus the schedule does not even fit the theme presented on the main page.
Kendra, if you are reading this, you may want to pass this along. Personally I prefer the more simple pink website that was in use before. Keep in mind that it may better to go with a more simple website that the ladies can keep up-to-date rather than paying somebody to keep it updated (they often fail on subsequent followups).
Question for SPs: Why is it so hard to find good web designers? Is it the nature of the business that's making them uncomfortable? Just how long does it take for some guy to make some good looking web pages?
