Regarding AUDREY

[shiva]

Aside from tryin to stay visible on the radar for self-promo, I’m not sure why AUDREY posted on the ‘DOKUS INTERUPTUS’ thread, but since she did, a few thoughts come to mind. I saw Audrey in the past on the basis of her two longest reviews. She is a friendly girl and has a very attractive physique. But unlike DOK, who I am supposed to be, my evaluation was not stellar. The word that came to mind was ‘mechanical’, but perhaps Mamsmans said it best in his recent review – ‘kinda robotic’. Going from apparently passionate heavy breathin at one point to, within a split second when asked if it was okay to switch positions, a voice tone not unlike expected from a grocery cashier when asked where the baked beans may be found.

Following our session, I had considered writing a favorable review of AUDREY and overlooking the lack of spontaneity that I observed. But then I noticed a posting in which AUDREY made comments about of a former client’s bedroom behavior (DOK and Taz 10/16/07), a client whom she had seen a number times and according to her, did not treat her disrespectfully. How professional is that for a well known sp? So in the interest of not having my personal sexual behavior splayed on a public forum by an sp who breaches confidentiality and appears to have some anger issues, I chose to not write a review. To add insult to injury, AUDREY then proceeds to use the client’s review (DOK) on her website for advertising – Can you say ‘HYP-O-CRIT-I-CAL’ Audrey?

 

[Crazy Ivan]

Hmmmmm maybe its just you??? I have found Audrey to be most amazing and have enjoyed are times together.

 

[vicgfelover]

I don't see the point in starting a new thread on an issue that is over a month old in a different thread. If you have regrets about not posting a review, that's your issue. You can't assume that every client and SP are going to have chemistry not every sp is for every client and vice versa.The beauty of this board is that both clients and providers are able to post their perspective and ppl can make up their own minds.

 

[A.U.D.R.E.Y]

Nice Try DOK

Hmmmm.........Nice try Shiva, Prometheus, DOK, Roshi .

Just like all your previous handles, once you were "exposed", you quietly disappeared from PERB offering no counter argument, which by the way, one would think you'd do, if you were being falsely accused or misrepresented .

I'm not even going to expend more energy than necessary in responding to this rubbish.

Who's the one with the issues here .

I think most of us on here have moved on & past the weird, never ending DOK saga.

Get some help & stop stalking me over the internet or I'll take additional measures .

 

[athaire]

Aside from tryin to stay visible on the radar for self-promo, I’m not sure why AUDREY posted on the ‘DOKUS INTERUPTUS’ thread, but since she did, a few thoughts come to mind. I saw Audrey in the past on the basis of her two longest reviews. She is a friendly girl and has a very attractive physique. But unlike DOK, who I am supposed to be, my evaluation was not stellar. The word that came to mind was ‘mechanical’, but perhaps Mamsmans said it best in his recent review – ‘kinda robotic’. Going from apparently passionate heavy breathin at one point to, within a split second when asked if it was okay to switch positions, a voice tone not unlike expected from a grocery cashier when asked where the baked beans may be found.

Following our session, I had considered writing a favorable review of AUDREY and overlooking the lack of spontaneity that I observed. But then I noticed a posting in which AUDREY made comments about of a former client’s bedroom behavior (DOK and Taz 10/16/07), a client whom she had seen a number times and according to her, did not treat her disrespectfully. How professional is that for a well known sp? So in the interest of not having my personal sexual behavior splayed on a public forum by an sp who breaches confidentiality and appears to have some anger issues, I chose to not write a review. To add insult to injury, AUDREY then proceeds to use the client’s review (DOK) on her website for advertising – Can you say ‘HYP-O-CRIT-I-CAL’ Audrey?

Why are you cluttering up the review area with this drivel? Put it in the 411 or something as this is for reviews.........And while I have never seen Audrey "her" rep speaks for itself, while yours is getting more and more sketchy by the post.........

 

[planetsmurf]

when i saw audrey she seemed very natural and easy to talk to. and why do people feel the need to start drama on here. drama is only good in movies(sometimes) but not in real life.

 

[hugedman]

shiva,

I had seen Audrey numerous time when I was working in Vancouver Island for about a year. I have to say that it's my pleasure to have met Audrey, such a warm, sensual, world class courtesan. I enjoyed my time with her. She's never being mechanical by any means. The only explanation I have is that maybe you did not have a good that when you saw Audrey.
Look forward to seeing you again Audrey, whenever you are coming to Vancouver

 

[PussyLover33]

But then I noticed a posting in which AUDREY made comments about of a former client’s bedroom behavior

No matter what any SP or any girl would say about my bedroom performance,
I ROCK OUT IN MY MIND hehehehehehe

 

[A.U.D.R.E.Y]

No matter what any SP or any girl would say about my bedroom performance,
I ROCK OUT IN MY MIND hehehehehehe

The thing is, I never made a comment about his bedroom behavior .

Another poster brought to the attention that DOK had "potentially" done something bad to another Sp & my comment was "he had never done anything to make me uncomfortable in my sessions with him", but he did however approach me in public. Which is why i got involved with this DOK thing in the 1st place.

Throughout this whole thing I have tried very hard to show compassion & to wish DOK all the best .

He just keeps brining it back up & is now making false accusations about my professionalism & character, which is not cool .

And as for the review, its up on my site because it is an accurate account of our time together.

Just because I'm no longer fond of you DOK, doesn't mean the review is invalid .

 

[Peepants]

Bad Character

The thing is, I never made a comment about his bedroom behavior .

Another poster brought to the attention that DOK had "potentially" done something bad to another Sp & my comment was "he had never done anything to make me uncomfortable in my sessions with him", but he did however approach me in public. Which is why i got involved with this DOK thing in the 1st place.

Throughout this whole thing I have tried very hard to show compassion & to wish DOK all the best .

He just keeps brining it back up & is now making false accusations about my professionalism & character, which is not cool .

And as for the review, its up on my site because it is an accurate account of our time together.

Just because I'm no longer found of you DOK, doesn't mean the review is invalid .

You said found instead of fond, dok was right!! hee hee

 

[PussyLover33]

The thing is, I never made a comment about his bedroom behavior

Sorry Audrey I was making fun of a silly post....

 

[A.U.D.R.E.Y]

Sorry Audrey I was making fun of a silly post....

Not to worry, Shiva's the one who said it 1st, you just commented on his quote .

I just felt the need to reiterate that point .

Hope its all clear now & that this thread, as well as all the other DOK threads can once & for all be finished.

I know i've had enough of this nonsense .

 

[Lesbian Hunter]

DOK - I think you forgot an R in your handle. Shouldn't it be DORK?


Audrey provides exemplary service and is a delight to be with as many on this board will attest to.

 

[Luke Stone]

I met Audrey in Victoria two times last year and both sessions were magnficent.

Luke Stone from North Carolina

 

[A.U.D.R.E.Y]

Thanks guys & girls .