driving around looking for parking around richards and seymour area at night, i always see sw's that look better then a lot of the girls you would see at a massage parlour. can anyone give me some info on how much the better looking sw's downtown are charging for fs.
Price of downtown sw's
- Thread starter ballhoneys
- Start date
Wot
Call up one of the great sp's on this board, and give that money to them. with $400.00, You could come with a small gift in hand, and have one of the best experiences of your life. Too bad Ericaobsession has moved to Calgary. Oh well, maybe you should scout out the sp halloween party. I would kill just to sit in a corner and drink there.
Call up one of the great sp's on this board, and give that money to them. with $400.00, You could come with a small gift in hand, and have one of the best experiences of your life. Too bad Ericaobsession has moved to Calgary. Oh well, maybe you should scout out the sp halloween party. I would kill just to sit in a corner and drink there.
Freakin Rip-offs
hey bro!
save your hard earned cash and use 1/2 of it on a reputable sp. stay the hell away from downtown SWs. they are for tourists who dont know any better.
it will be one of the worse mistakes of your pooning life.
my loonie's!
ic
hey bro!
save your hard earned cash and use 1/2 of it on a reputable sp. stay the hell away from downtown SWs. they are for tourists who dont know any better.
it will be one of the worse mistakes of your pooning life.
my loonie's!
ic
i think there is another thread on this subject..under "seymore street"? maybe..
100 is just to get them there, and guarantees a quick hj
200 is a fully clothed cbj
300 is a naked cbj
400 is fs
all of this + the room fee.
restrictions:
no daty,digits,dfk,lfk,greek,bbbj,basically no skin to skin contact.
most of the girls dont go to residences unless you pay for 2 girls.
some may travel to upscale downtown pads.
if i remember correctly..its been a little while since i worked down there.
if you ask me...its a rip.. i feel ashamed to have worked there..and thats why i left shortly after realizing this.
hope my info helps.
x0x
arianna
100 is just to get them there, and guarantees a quick hj
200 is a fully clothed cbj
300 is a naked cbj
400 is fs
all of this + the room fee.
restrictions:
no daty,digits,dfk,lfk,greek,bbbj,basically no skin to skin contact.
most of the girls dont go to residences unless you pay for 2 girls.
some may travel to upscale downtown pads.
if i remember correctly..its been a little while since i worked down there.
if you ask me...its a rip.. i feel ashamed to have worked there..and thats why i left shortly after realizing this.
hope my info helps.
x0x
arianna
100 is just to get them there, and guarantees a quick hj
200 is a fully clothed cbj
300 is a naked cbj
400 is fs
all of this + the room fee.
restrictions:
no daty,digits,dfk,lfk,greek,bbbj,basically no skin to skin contact.
if i remember correctly..its been a little while since i worked down there.
if you ask me...its a rip.. i feel ashamed to have worked there..and thats why i left shortly after realizing this.
Make no mistake, the "rip" isn't the women, or the actual prices. The rip-off is the constant up-selling.
The women down on Richards/Seymour (1965 vintage) were leading with "can you spend a hundred bucks?" twenty years ago.
And I fully admit that some of them, over the years, have been so immaculately attired and strikingly pretty that IF they'd been wearing a neon-glow pricetag on their backs which said "$400", then they'd have been occasionally worth the money IF it was an hour, fully nude, hands-on, and unrushed.
There is something about their implied availability and promiscuity which, when combined with the central location downtown, makes for a whole lot to resist. But to those who know immediately that there is perhaps no upper limit to the money they'll ask for, it isn't so difficult to keep walking...
Arianna, I would love to know the nitty gritty realities behind the reasons why we almost never see any sort of police busts of the women or johns in the area of the Seymour stroll?
It seems like such economic discrimination to let attractive women whose main game is deception peddle their wares in plain sight while sincere women who are struggling to make it each month are heavily policed on the midtrack at the same time.
Of course there is talk of "pimps" and some sort of organized crime with those girls on Seymour, but can you dare to offer particulars about just why you seldom if ever see a cop swoop down upon a guy who just picked-up one of those stunners on Seymour?
Thanks in advance!
The sw's in the dtes are the most vulnerable group of sp's not to mention the chaos the neighbourhood itself has been forced to endure by being an open air drug market/asylum. The 50 sex trade workers that were brutally murdered in the 90's were not from hitrack, they were from the dtes & vice has made a very sober decision to use its limited resources to protect the safety of those girls while trying to maintain a semblance order for residents & businesses.
vv is right ...
to my understanding the dt police dept, have allowed the hitrack ladies to work without being bothered, but have limited to blocks to seymore and part of richards. i guess its there way of controlling the prostitution issue.
cops dont bother anyone unless they are clearly soliciting in open public..then you might get a pull over.
to my understanding the dt police dept, have allowed the hitrack ladies to work without being bothered, but have limited to blocks to seymore and part of richards. i guess its there way of controlling the prostitution issue.
cops dont bother anyone unless they are clearly soliciting in open public..then you might get a pull over.
Hard to believe the police are still allowing the Seymour stroll, with the change to residential the area has undergone.
I guess the residents (very few families) of the condos aren't complaining.
The SWs still there look very territorial, I bet if a DTES SW wandered over there, she wouldn't be there for long.
I guess the residents (very few families) of the condos aren't complaining.
The SWs still there look very territorial, I bet if a DTES SW wandered over there, she wouldn't be there for long.
I was pulled over by a cop once after picking up a Seymour SW. nothing happened in the end, was told to go home in a nutshell.
I know a few of the girls there who beat the shit out of a Kingsway SW who came down a few times to Seymour. Right there on Helmcken in an alley they were booting her on the ground to get their point across. And their pimp was right there watching as they did it.
I know a few of the girls there who beat the shit out of a Kingsway SW who came down a few times to Seymour. Right there on Helmcken in an alley they were booting her on the ground to get their point across. And their pimp was right there watching as they did it.
vv is right ...
to my understanding the dt police dept, have allowed the hitrack ladies to work without being bothered, but have limited to blocks to seymore and part of richards. i guess its there way of controlling the prostitution issue.
cops dont bother anyone unless they are clearly soliciting in open public..then you might get a pull over.
Once again, people seem afraid to address the actual question. The only people who will even allude to the realities are the male respondents.
There are definitely pimps involved, and there is most probably some dirty dealing behind the scenes between city workers and those pimps or their associates, but perhaps our female friends here have been sworn to secrecy.
If city leaders would eliminate the middle men, and harness the powers of supply and demand, the downtown east side could be completely cleared of prostitution which would, in turn, make drug activity more prominent and easier to clamp down on.
But somewhere, deep behind the scenes at city hall, take-home pay for key decision-makers is greater for their seeming to look the other way than to take logical action and change the landscape of prostitution in the lower mainland.
The males here at PERB pay a great deal of that financial freight while that same financial freight is carved out of the flesh of many of the women here at PERB. Why doesn't anyone care to shine the light on the corrupt members of city hall and make things better for everyone aside from those pimps?
So far we can't even get two women who hint that they know their way around the high track to even make mention of the pimps and the organized crime behind them.
Anyone?
actually i believe TTT mentioned something along the lines of what your looking for in another thread..
https://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=71798&highlight=seymore
so its obvious the girls on hitrack work for there men...and its obvious is quite organized, im not sure about the city hall thing..or any inside sources, but i will say this.
there are basically 3 types of ladies you could choose to see
1) an sw who works for her man...does business on the street, and doesnt see a dime from what shes worked for.(maybe luxeries like clothes,cars,etc)
2) an sp who works out of an mp, and maybe sees partial of what shes earned and in some cases all of it.
3) an indy who works for herself, keeps every dime earned, works out of her own incall. and doesnt answer to anyone..
its all a matter of choice...all of the ladies above could be great service providers, and genuine girls..but it all depends on the suitor and in what atmosphere he wishes to see his lady.
https://perb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=71798&highlight=seymore
so its obvious the girls on hitrack work for there men...and its obvious is quite organized, im not sure about the city hall thing..or any inside sources, but i will say this.
there are basically 3 types of ladies you could choose to see
1) an sw who works for her man...does business on the street, and doesnt see a dime from what shes worked for.(maybe luxeries like clothes,cars,etc)
2) an sp who works out of an mp, and maybe sees partial of what shes earned and in some cases all of it.
3) an indy who works for herself, keeps every dime earned, works out of her own incall. and doesnt answer to anyone..
its all a matter of choice...all of the ladies above could be great service providers, and genuine girls..but it all depends on the suitor and in what atmosphere he wishes to see his lady.
That would mean the feds would have to change the laws. Municipalities simply don't have the power, all they do is license mp's & agencies..while doing as little as possible to ensure a paycheck at the end of the week. Vancouver/BC is very tolerant towards prostitution not to mention it's one of the few places where indie's don't have to have pimps..not sure what all your complainin is about?
You seem to have missed some important realities:
The only reason to opt for an "SP" is to no longer be at odds with the long arm of the law.
And everyone knows that "her own incall" is illegal !!
Why not have numbers 4, 5 and 6 on your list:
4) Craigslist "pros" who will come and visit me at my place, and thus are thumbing their nose at the law only in the sense that they're using a cell phone vs. a land line.
5) Craigslist "non-pros" who will come and visit me at my place, who may need fast cash once or twice a month when simply trying to make ends meet, and who still may arrive without the impact of months or years in this business dictating their every skittish move.
6) Low-track crack addicts who are at least out there and available when the "indy who works for herself" is out spending those dimes, and "doesn't answer" her phone.
Even with these you have still omitted lots of permutations of the sorts of working girls who can be found in the lower mainland.
I'm always in search of the the elusive
7) mid-track women who may only work once or twice a month when fast cash is needed, and who often seem more personable than those in the other categories we've listed.
Which brings me back to square one:
Get rid of the corruption in city government which decides, behind the scenes, that pimps dictate which women sell sex at midtown without the authorities lifting a finger to stop it. Bring the more sincere women who are just doing what they need to do to pay their bills to the upscale midtown locations and then turn the other way while they then keep every dime they earn and perhaps give their children a better life.
Once you do that, the drug-dealing on the downtown east side will become far more conspicuous and more easily combatted by police who would finally have a cause that will benefit society from young to old, and from border to border.
Realities? I know I've challenged you on this before but how far do you think that "her own incall" is illegal in Canada, and if it is (common bawdy house) how easy do you think it would be for Crown Council to prosecute this?
As for (4) cell phone vs. land line, it seems that you are applying simple US racketeering laws to Canadian laws that DO NOT recognize such legislation.
A land line and a cell line are both PRIVATE spaces, therefore communication for the purposes of prostitution does not apply. I mean, God, if anything it would be the cell phone, since you'd more easily be caught making a date with an SP on a cell phone in public than a land line. And if you still believe this, SSR, whose legal opinions I have respected thus far, show me such damning legislation and not some regurgitated legal info off some overdone, overacted American courtroom television drama.
Panther
Sir, you don't have a clue.
How would U.S. laws have anything to do with this?
Everyone knows that prostitution itself remains illegal in the U.S., and they don't need these silly skirting measures like Canada does.
The phone signal is what makes it illegal, not where you might be standing when you dial the cell phone. The mere idea that such a transmission might be picked up by any of several electronic devices makes it a public place.
And to my knowledge, we're not discussing "how easy...?", we are discussing the laws as they stand today, in Canada, in 2007/2008.
When you know enough to add to the discussion, only then should you bother coming around to make it clear to others how little you know.
Lastly, you are clearly confusing me with another poster, for we have certainly not interacted significantly in the past.
