30 mins vs 60 mins - What's your preference and why?

AAAS@2001

New member
Apr 5, 2026
4
1
3
Hey everyone,

I'm curious to know what most of you prefer when booking: a 30-minute session or a full hour?

In your experience:

Do you find 30 mins too rushed (considering the shower, etc.)?

Is the price jump to 60 mins worth the extra time for you?

Which one do you feel gives a better overall experience?

Just trying to see the pros and cons from your perspective. Cheers!
 

carsman123

Active member
Nov 5, 2023
54
107
33
45 minutes is what I've usually aimed for, but my last two sessions were 60 minutes and 90 minutes respectively. It's just nicer to not be rushed, go slow, and do everything I want to do without worrying if I need to finish soon. 30 minutes just feels too short to me to get into it and have fun.
 

Harmony-bc

Supporting Member
Sep 28, 2008
2,664
3,513
113
South west vancouver
zensualgirl.net
I prefer 90 minutes as I prefer sessions that are not rushed and aren’t straight down to business. And I prefer staying low volume.

But it really depends on what you’re looking for. If you’re just looking for a quickie on your lunch break, then half hours are perfect for you. If you’re looking for a bit of a connection then longer sessions are better. It also depends on the lady and the establishment. Some places/ladies make their money off volume so they’d rather do 5 to 10 half hours in a day rather than 1 or 2 longer sessions.

Everybody’s preferences are different. And not all places or ladies operate the same.
 

good t

Member
Feb 14, 2024
42
39
18
my first date is most the time a hh then if we click then book at least 90 min our longer. have had a number of 4 and 6 hr dates with the same girl.
 

Wilkins

Active member
Jan 22, 2026
101
216
43
Even though I always see girls during my lunch break I just take a long lunch and book the hour. Can’t imagine how much time I’d have left after buzzing up and then the shower plus cleanup afterwards. I know apparently the time is supposed to start when you walk in the door of the suite but that is never the vibe I get (across every agency I’ve booked with). Plus when it costs like $300 for a hh and less than $100 more to double it my brain can’t ignore that lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: armando_macarena

asg

New member
Feb 23, 2026
2
0
1
Usually always aim for 60-90 minutes, I think it depends on personal preference and experiences, but personally I need an hour at least to enjoy the session, and 30 minute rushed sessions don't do anything for me
 

blondeluver

Ultimate lover
Jan 27, 2003
840
842
93
North Vancouver
30min for me most of the time because I found that a lot of girls try to use massage to kill time and in the end, you still have 20min or so. In that case, why not just go for 30min? When I need a good massage and HE, then I will book for 60/90min appointment.
 

epicurean604

Long Standing Member
Aug 18, 2006
48
7
8
Vancouver
90-120 min is preferred for first meeting. I like to relax first, get in the mood, maybe enjoy a glass of wine together and then go from there.
 

SUPER1

Active member
Oct 30, 2017
78
60
33
30-45 minutes for the first meeting. It's not just about how I feel, it's also how she feels. If things are good. Then a longer 2nd visit, or maybe things are good at 30 minutes. You'd be surprised how much fun and passionate a 30 mjnute lunch time romp could be.
 

markus12

Active member
Dec 18, 2014
450
232
43
With rare exceptions, I usually do 30 for first time. Once a rapport has been established, I bump it up accordingly to 45 or 60
 

darrenbuzz20

Well-known member
Oct 21, 2020
291
365
63
Hey everyone,

I'm curious to know what most of you prefer when booking: a 30-minute session or a full hour?

In your experience:

Do you find 30 mins too rushed (considering the shower, etc.)?

Is the price jump to 60 mins worth the extra time for you?

Which one do you feel gives a better overall experience?

Just trying to see the pros and cons from your perspective. Cheers!
Big fan of 45 min! Solo or duos, although duos always warrant longer if budget allows !
 

SolidSnake

Well-known member
Mar 27, 2015
3,155
2,022
113
With some girls it makes no difference if you book 45 or 60: you get 30 at most (See my recent review.)
 

Banger77

Active member
Mar 22, 2008
310
83
28
Cruising in my RV
After some SP research my personal preference has always been 1hour sessions for first meetups; would like to know whom I'm bumping uglies with that's just my MO. If the rapport goes well then it's a repeat for a 1hour sessions which might eventually lead to 90mins. or longer sessions.
 
Last edited:

GentlemanJack69

Well-known member
Feb 16, 2023
577
1,226
93
Hey everyone,

I'm curious to know what most of you prefer when booking: a 30-minute session or a full hour?

In your experience:

Do you find 30 mins too rushed (considering the shower, etc.)?

Is the price jump to 60 mins worth the extra time for you?

Which one do you feel gives a better overall experience?

Just trying to see the pros and cons from your perspective. Cheers!
I always book 1 hour, for several reasons. 1) I budget for these sessions and 2, 1 hour sessions per month is basically my budget. 2) My preference is to play for about 1/2 hour and then give my partner a massage for the rest of the session. Giving a massage to a beautiful lady is pleasurable and relaxes me, leaving me both satisfied and relaxed. That's basically the reasons for me.
 
Vancouver Escorts