Who else is like this?? 👀

[TheBellaRoseXo]

I’ve never been the type to want to do unspeakable things with a man solely on sight. Maybe I’ll entertain the idea, if the man is THAT handsome/chiseled.
But without trust or rapport, sexual mechanical manipulation feels… unstimulating (or overstimulating, at times). Sadly, I think that’s the cost of my brain power. 😂

Here’s a mini set of terms which influence how I take in sessions and connect with others ⬇😇😈

Asexual Spectrum	Sexual Spectrum	Connection-Triggered Attraction
Graysexual Demisexual Sapiosexual Cupiosexual	Bisexual	Psychosexual Emotiosexual Affectosexual Energosensual

It’s weird being someone who can cream her panties at the dinner table over discussion, but mainly experiences people asexually until connection is there.

Is anyone else like this?

 

[Bang4thebuck]

I’ve never been the type to want to do unspeakable things with a man solely on sight. Maybe I’ll entertain the idea, if the man is THAT handsome/chiseled.
But without trust or rapport, sexual mechanical manipulation feels… unstimulating (or overstimulating, at times). Sadly, I think that’s the cost of my brain power. 😂

Here’s a mini set of terms which influence how I take in sessions and connect with others ⬇😇😈

Asexual Spectrum	Sexual Spectrum	Connection-Triggered Attraction
Graysexual Demisexual Sapiosexual Cupiosexual	Bisexual	Psychosexual Emotiosexual Affectosexual Energosensual

It’s weird being someone who can cream her panties at the dinner table over discussion, but mainly experiences people asexually until connection is there.

Is anyone else like this?

I don't think many guys on an escort review site are going to want an emotional connection for sex. Sometimes the less you know someone, the better it is.

 

[TheBellaRoseXo]

I don't think many guys on an escort review site are going to want an emotional connection for sex. Sometimes the less you know someone, the better it is.

Banter is a form of emotional and intellectual connection, because it recognizes the actual emotion to be able to have the exchange. You can have completely non-commital and non-romantic emotional sexual connection. I’m talking about knowing what actually stimulates the partner. This directly applies to people who want a genuine OHhh for the SP. 😊🤷‍♀️

And now that I think about it: I’ve had the pleasure of being an actual companion for multiple widowers. My heart goes out for them. ♥ Lastly, who’s doesn’t exchange energy, and by extension emotion, when snuggling??? Even the fuckboys I’ve met love snuggling. 🤔☺

 

[SirReverence]

And sometimes, the sex is better the better you know someone. The mind does work in mysterious ways.

 

[golferjohn]

I’ve never been the type to want to do unspeakable things with a man solely on sight. Maybe I’ll entertain the idea, if the man is THAT handsome/chiseled.
But without trust or rapport, sexual mechanical manipulation feels… unstimulating (or overstimulating, at times). Sadly, I think that’s the cost of my brain power. 😂

Here’s a mini set of terms which influence how I take in sessions and connect with others ⬇😇😈

Asexual Spectrum	Sexual Spectrum	Connection-Triggered Attraction
Graysexual Demisexual Sapiosexual Cupiosexual	Bisexual	Psychosexual Emotiosexual Affectosexual Energosensual

It’s weird being someone who can cream her panties at the dinner table over discussion, but mainly experiences people asexually until connection is there.

Is anyone else like this?

Welcome to Mother Nature's big/fat joke

 

[phool]

I don't think many guys on an escort review site are going to want an emotional connection for sex. Sometimes the less you know someone, the better it is.

I guess I'm in the minority bc while I don't NEED an emotional connection for sex with an sp, it's the difference btw good sex and someone I'll probably never see again. I'm not looking for someone to make me cum, I can do that just fine on my own, I'm looking for an experience, and most of that will be conversational/emotional way before it becomes physical. Fucking someone that wants to be fucked by you is completely different than fucking someone that tolerates being fucked by you.

 

[Bang4thebuck]

I guess I'm in the minority bc while I don't NEED an emotional connection for sex with an sp, it's the difference btw good sex and someone I'll probably never see again. I'm not looking for someone to make me cum, I can do that just fine on my own, I'm looking for an experience, and most of that will be conversational/emotional way before it becomes physical. Fucking someone that wants to be fucked by you is completely different than fucking someone that tolerates being fucked by you.

Yes, of course, but I'm mindful that we are being sold an illusion of a connection. It's not genuine, it's ultimately a transaction driven by money. Not every girl can be trusted either with emotional intimacy, it opens you up to being used or exploited. If a girl is too talkative I'm curious as to whether her intentions are to genuinely get to know me, to make small talk to build her /my comfort with having sex with a stranger, to wind down the clock, or to find out a way to get more money out of me.

 

[rinamood]

Fun chats, laughs, and chemistry definitely make me more sensitive, but I don't consider it necessary with my libido being so high. I experience men sexually first, emotionally optionally; pleasure is pleasure 🌸

I am happily horny with the right physical stimulation alone. Not by words or eye contact, but by hands, mouths, and otherwise 👀

Naturally, I feel more comfortable with regular/repeat clients. A familiar face and some knowledge of the person is comfy. Most clients do want to get better-acquainted or catch up chatting first, and I'm usually the one to drag them to bed if that goes on too long. Those talks sometimes lead to niche playtime ideas. The main thought that occurs for me when a client arrives is still "I GET TO HAVE SEX!!"

 

[Equity Market investor]

And, just how many much older gentlemen would be in the same head space. Perhaps ones under 40 years of age per say with good stamina lol. Good perspective though.

I don't think many guys on an escort review site are going to want an emotional connection for sex. Sometimes the less you know someone, the better it is.

 

[GeeBeeP]

Banter is a form of emotional and intellectual connection, because it recognizes the actual emotion to be able to have the exchange. You can have completely non-commital and non-romantic emotional sexual connection. I’m talking about knowing what actually stimulates the partner. This directly applies to people who want a genuine OHhh for the SP. 😊🤷‍♀️

And now that I think about it: I’ve had the pleasure of being an actual companion for multiple widowers. My heart goes out for them. ♥ Lastly, who’s doesn’t exchange energy, and by extension emotion, when snuggling??? Even the fuckboys I’ve met love snuggling. 🤔☺

A true “Emotional Connection” with an SP may be an illusion to some extent, but the banter, flirting and with luck some form of intellectual connection are definitely on my wish list. I found out long ago that 1 hour sessions with SP’s often left me underwhelmed and wanting something more. Leaving time for an introduction and that time spent chatting on the couch is worth the investment, but it also highlights the value of reviews. If guys describe a girl as all business and a “let's get right to the sex” type the minute a client walks in, I’m far less likely to seek out her company.

 

[rinamood]

A true “Emotional Connection” with an SP may be an illusion to some extent, but the banter, flirting and with luck some form of intellectual connection are definitely on my wish list. I found out long ago that 1 hour sessions with SP’s often left me underwhelmed and wanting something more. Leaving time for an introduction and that time spent chatting on the couch is worth the investment, but it also highlights the value of reviews. If guys describe a girl as all business and a “let's get right to the sex” type the minute a client walks in, I’m far less likely to seek out her company.

Most of my clients seem to share in this mindset! Banter & flirting at the start of playtime 🔥 It's why chats on the couch is always offered first.

 

[hoze]

Most of my clients seem to share in this mindset! Banter & flirting at the start of playtime 🔥 It's why chats on the couch is always offered first.

It's called foreplay,,, wood hooo 🤗. I like to break the ice with warm gestures, a few jokes and non personal banter so the ladies get a quick read on me as sp's are experts in this field and it gets us to the next fun level of play time.

 

[80watts]

I’ve never been the type to want to do unspeakable things with a man solely on sight. Maybe I’ll entertain the idea, if the man is THAT handsome/chiseled.
But without trust or rapport, sexual mechanical manipulation feels… unstimulating (or overstimulating, at times). Sadly, I think that’s the cost of my brain power. 😂

Here’s a mini set of terms which influence how I take in sessions and connect with others ⬇😇😈

Asexual Spectrum	Sexual Spectrum	Connection-Triggered Attraction
Graysexual Demisexual Sapiosexual Cupiosexual	Bisexual	Psychosexual Emotiosexual Affectosexual Energosensual

It’s weird being someone who can cream her panties at the dinner table over discussion, but mainly experiences people asexually until connection is there.

Is anyone else like this?

I have to say that you have too many big words in your table (an example of thinking to much). If your partner makes you wet, the better the sex. Good for you. Individuals get turned on by different things ... boobs, ass, legs etc.


And for the last and greatest note: The brain is the biggest sexual organ there is; so engaging in conversation is the start to engaging the brain.
Men and Women take sex differently. Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus. Read the book...

Ps. The brain is the biggest sexual organ, so engaging in conversation is engaging the brain and the biggest sexual organ...

 

[TheBellaRoseXo]

I have to say that you have too many big words in your table (an example of thinking to much). If your partner makes you wet, the better the sex. Good for you. Individuals get turned on by different things ... boobs, ass, legs etc.


And for the last and greatest note: The brain is the biggest sexual organ there is; so engaging in conversation is the start to engaging the brain.
Men and Women take sex differently. Men are from Mars and Women are from Venus. Read the book...

Ps. The brain is the biggest sexual organ, so engaging in conversation is engaging the brain and the biggest sexual organ...

I would normally be a bit upset by this one... But I just saw a FABULOUS eater, and you’ve proven your own argument underwhelming...
So, Where do I start?

”too many big words in your table” = “Spell this out for me”

• It’s okay that YOU don’t know them and don’t care to look them up. You aren’t staying with me, so it is of no consequence to me specifically. The thread was about relating to those who would likely to respond well to intellect and connecting with men about something more than what colour I should choose, the weather, sports, or other small talk.
• I learned 2 of those words in an effort to make this post. Learning new language to articulate your own experience and connect with others isn’t overthinking Sir. Your message is evidence of the male loneliness epidemic not being lonesome enough to lose misogyny. 👎

“an example of thinking too much”

• Perhaps @80watts enjoys the “male loneliness epidemic” so much that he is encouraging women to not bother knowing men beyond which hole they put it in. SOOO sorry I want to hear a man’s perspective who isn’t stimulated by looks the same way you are, that I enjoy discussing and learning how men connect during intimate moments beyond the pornographic and am doing it on a review thread. Damn my thinking!!! WHAT A HORRIBLE QUALITY! 🤷🏼‍♀️😂🤣

”if your partner makes you wet, the better the sex.”

• OMFG! The poor girls you stay with! If? IF??!
• Stater of the obvious much….? 🤔

”Individuals get turned on by different things”…

• Proceeds to list only physical attributes as if that’s well-rounded... 🤦‍♀️ My guy, the thread is titled “Who else is like this??”… I’m looking to interact with men who aren’t stimulated nearly as much by beauty alone and may have a similar experience (or a derivative) of mine. It’s more than okay if you’re only turned on by the physical, but this isn’t your thread then. 🤷🏼‍♀️

”Men and women take sex differently... Blah blah blah… Read the book…”

• HAHAHAHA 😂 Big ask coming from a man who says the 12 big words in my table are too big. Classic “do more work… than me” standpoint 🤣

It’s redundant to put “of last and greatest note” only to follow it up with a PS…

• That hurt my heart. Genuinely. You lost that Ooomph!
• and to be stating the same sentence again as if I couldn’t make sense of it the first time… Misogyny or carelessness. Take your pick. I really don’t care which.

”engaging in conversation is engaging the brain and the biggest sexual organ”

• Stated as if ANY conversation automatically stimulates someone enough to be turned on. I could discuss a bucket and get you hard, couldn’t I? 🪣

For last and greatest note (actually): I question the quality of your conversation and ability to have any without condescension. 🤷🏼‍♀️

 

[steverino]

Before it closed down, Sweet VIPs in Victoria provided a really nice bio sheet on the ladies (they had the choice to opt-in or not). My recollection is that it included things like favourite band, favourite cuisine, travel destination they would most like to visit, turn ons, turn offs, pets, what they wore to bed, musical instruments they played, hobbies, and others.

I found it very helpful as you could identify areas of common interest and conversation starters which reduced discomfort associated with a first visit. It also made it easy to share your own information if you were comfortable doing so.

 

[Harmony-bc]

I would normally be a bit upset by this one... But I just saw a FABULOUS eater, and you’ve proven your own argument underwhelming...
So, Where do I start?

”too many big words in your table” = “Spell this out for me”

• It’s okay that YOU don’t know them and don’t care to look them up. You aren’t staying with me, so it is of no consequence to me specifically. The thread was about relating to those who would likely to respond well to intellect and connecting with men about something more than what colour I should choose, the weather, sports, or other small talk.
• I learned 2 of those words in an effort to make this post. Learning new language to articulate your own experience and connect with others isn’t overthinking Sir. Your message is evidence of the male loneliness epidemic not being lonesome enough to lose misogyny. 👎

“an example of thinking too much”

• Perhaps @80watts enjoys the “male loneliness epidemic” so much that he is encouraging women to not bother knowing men beyond which hole they put it in. SOOO sorry I want to hear a man’s perspective who isn’t stimulated by looks the same way you are, that I enjoy discussing and learning how men connect during intimate moments beyond the pornographic and am doing it on a review thread. Damn my thinking!!! WHAT A HORRIBLE QUALITY! 🤷🏼‍♀️😂🤣

”if your partner makes you wet, the better the sex.”

• OMFG! The poor girls you stay with! If? IF??!
• Stater of the obvious much….? 🤔

”Individuals get turned on by different things”…

• Proceeds to list only physical attributes as if that’s well-rounded... 🤦‍♀️ My guy, the thread is titled “Who else is like this??”… I’m looking to interact with men who aren’t stimulated nearly as much by beauty alone and may have a similar experience (or a derivative) of mine. It’s more than okay if you’re only turned on by the physical, but this isn’t your thread then. 🤷🏼‍♀️

”Men and women take sex differently... Blah blah blah… Read the book…”

• HAHAHAHA 😂 Big ask coming from a man who says the 12 big words in my table are too big. Classic “do more work… than me” standpoint 🤣

It’s redundant to put “of last and greatest note” only to follow it up with a PS…

• That hurt my heart. Genuinely. You lost that Ooomph!
• and to be stating the same sentence again as if I couldn’t make sense of it the first time… Misogyny or carelessness. Take your pick. I really don’t care which.

”engaging in conversation is engaging the brain and the biggest sexual organ”

• Stated as if ANY conversation automatically stimulates someone enough to be turned on. I could discuss a bucket and get you hard, couldn’t I? 🪣

For last and greatest note (actually): I question the quality of your conversation and ability to have any without condescension. 🤷🏼‍♀️

This whole post was incredibly sexy. I loved reading it. 💕

 

[masterpoonhunter]

good stuff snipped
Fucking someone that wants to be fucked by you is completely different than fucking someone that tolerates being fucked by you.

THIS to me, is the defining statement of what is good sex.
When you both want it, it then becomes a matter of just how badly you both want it and if you both want it REALLY FUCKING BADLY, well ... there you go.

 

[80watts]

I’ve never been the type to want to do unspeakable things with a man solely on sight. Maybe I’ll entertain the idea, if the man is THAT handsome/chiseled.
But without trust or rapport, sexual mechanical manipulation feels… unstimulating (or overstimulating, at times). Sadly, I think that’s the cost of my brain power. 😂

Here’s a mini set of terms which influence how I take in sessions and connect with others ⬇😇😈

Asexual Spectrum	Sexual Spectrum	Connection-Triggered Attraction
Graysexual Demisexual Sapiosexual Cupiosexual	Bisexual	Psychosexual Emotiosexual Affectosexual Energosensual

It’s weird being someone who can cream her panties at the dinner table over discussion, but mainly experiences people asexually until connection is there.

Is anyone else like this?

I did look up all the words. First column there were references on google, but the 3rd column, not easily found on google, so I did not look further for them. So I have to assume they came from a textbook of some kind.
Asexuality refers to a sexual orientation where individuals do not experience sexual attraction toward others. Asexual people, often referred to as "aces," may still experience romantic attraction but do not desire sexual relationships.
This line:
It’s weird being someone who can cream her panties at the dinner table over discussion, but mainly experiences people asexually until connection is there.

Really dosen't make sense, you are sexually excited over discussion; but are asexual until you are sexually attracted to them?? Which is it, its one or the other. If you are asexual, how the fuck are you creaming in your pants over a conversation. Therefore you can't be asexual, because you are sexually attracted to them.

Here are some words I know. Heterosexual, Homosexual, Bisexual, beyond these 3 words, you quickly lose people trying to explain your sexuality. The old rule applies here: Keep it Simple

 

[TheBellaRoseXo]

I did look up all the words. First column there were references on google, but the 3rd column, not easily found on google, so I did not look further for them. So I have to assume they came from a textbook of some kind.
Asexuality refers to a sexual orientation where individuals do not experience sexual attraction toward others. Asexual people, often referred to as "aces," may still experience romantic attraction but do not desire sexual relationships.
This line:
It’s weird being someone who can cream her panties at the dinner table over discussion, but mainly experiences people asexually until connection is there.

Really dosen't make sense, you are sexually excited over discussion; but are asexual until you are sexually attracted to them?? Which is it, its one or the other. If you are asexual, how the fuck are you creaming in your pants over a conversation. Therefore you can't be asexual, because you are sexually attracted to them.

Here are some words I know. Heterosexual, Homosexual, Bisexual, beyond these 3 words, you quickly lose people trying to explain your sexuality. The old rule applies here: Keep it Simple

https://chatgpt.com/share/6928a47f-7980-8004-b679-e599e98d4f7e
Then you don’t understand the definition of ”Graysexual” even though you looked it up. There you go hun!

Like I said, this was to reach to a niche set of men for discussion - not everybody. It’s okay if people lose interest.
Those aren’t my people then and they can kindly exit. Have a blessed day! 😊

 

[phool]

Here are some words I know. Heterosexual, Homosexual, Bisexual, beyond these 3 words, you quickly lose people trying to explain your sexuality. The old rule applies here: Keep it Simple

Hey, at least you're honest with your own ignorance about this (not as in 'you're dumb' but just haven't learned about it yet) but sexuality can be on a spectrum, not just black/white/grey. While hers is more fluid than yours apparently, it doesn't mean she owes anyone an explanation they don't want to hear about. To answer the OP question: You are not like this. Easy peasy.