ASIANDELIGHT - 6006
- Thread starter Scorpion63
- Start date
Not new and yes there is a website... https://asiandelight.cc
Give it a try now. We submitted the false positive to Bitdefender and this shouldn't be flagging anymore.
Last edited:
You can try checking again, the false positive check was submitted to Avast as well but not sure how long they take to turn it around.
The photos appear to be run through an AI filter to the point where you may have a 5-10% reference at best.
For example it looks like Myrtle on AsianDelight is Malai from XDS and 032 from PrivateParadise, based on Myrtle being in the same area, having same listed stats, exact same rates & extras as Malai and 032, and sharing the slightest facial resemblance after the AI filter.
You can see the real (maybe slightly edited) photos of her that XDS and PP uses, while in comparison the photos AsianDelight uses doesn't look much like her real photos.
AsianDelight: https://asiandelight.cc/products/myrtle
XDS: https://xiao-dimsum.com/malai-平采娜/
PP: https://privateparadise.cc/2025/03/04/thai-032220-260-30030-45-60mins/
The vast majority of AsianDelight's photos are in this vein, if you expect the girls to look like their AI photos you'll likely be set up for disappointment.
AsianDelight:
XDS:
PP:
Last edited:
not trying to defend them or anything but isn't the first picture literally from xiuren and therefore actually a different girl compared to privateparadise and xiao-dimsum?The photos appear to be run through an AI filter to the point where you may have a 5-10% reference at best.
For example it looks like Myrtle on AsianDelight is Malai from XDS and 032 from PrivateParadise, based on Myrtle being in the same area, having same listed stats, exact same rates & extras as Malai and 032, and sharing the slightest facial resemblance after the AI filter.
You can see the real (maybe slightly edited) photos of her that XDS and PP uses, while in comparison the photos AsianDelight uses is comical in comparison and doesn't look anything like her real photos.
AsianDelight: https://asiandelight.cc/products/myrtle
XDS: https://xiao-dimsum.com/malai-平采娜/
PP: https://privateparadise.cc/2025/03/04/thai-032220-260-30030-45-60mins/
The vast majority of AsianDelight's photos are in this vein, if you expect the girls to look like their AI photos you'll likely be set up for disappointment.
AsianDelight:
XDS:
PP:
News flash @Biggalactis : Aside from AF, they’re all using filters/photoshop/AI (insert whatever tool you want to call it).... Would you prefer the face to be fully covered/blurred out so the resemblance focuses on the body?
Last edited:
Thank you for pointing out the obvious. For simplicity sake let's call filters/photoshop/AI just "editing".
If we're keeping it real, there's different levels of editing, and some photos are just not the SP at all, with most of the popular Asian micros using a mix. The most common forms of real photos with minor edits are ones that are clearly taken in the SP's room locally.
In my example with Myrtle/Malai/032, I don't think it's controversial to say Malai and 032 are real photos taken in a room locally with minor edits, while Myrtle is either significantly edited or not a photo of the SP at all.
And to answer your question, I think most pooners prefer real photos with as little editing as possible, if possible. While we understand this cannot always be the case due to the individual SP's comfort level on privacy, there are Asian micros that do provide my described "real photos with minor edits", which unfortunately cannot be found on AsianDelight.
I'm not sure what xiuren is but I assumed it was the same girl (just more heavily edited) as there is a slight facial resemblance between Myrtle and Malai/032.
@Biggalactis Cheers for the info mate. I don't mind if it's minor stuff like smoothening of the skin, or manipulating angles to show a flat stomach where there might be a tiny bit of a belly. As long as the face is the same, and the physique is reasonably "accurate". As you said, usually the photos taken in their room are the only real ones but sometimes they have professional photoshoots as well but those ones beg the question: are the photos current enough to accurately reflect their appearance or was it from their long-past prime, years ago?
In my experience, the Japanese providers usually have the most accurate photos and are the only ones that I've gone "wow, they look even better than the photos". Korean photos are almost 99% a completely different person. And Chinese providers are 50/50 and even the real ones have what you mentioned as "real photos with minor edits", although big YMMV on the "minor" part. Some websites do have a "100% real photos/accurate/selfie" on the ad to give you an idea if the photo is at all accurate or if you're going to be opening up a box of chocolates.
Just today actually, I saw a Japanese lady whose pictures, despite saying "100% real photos" (which they technically were) were clearly from a while ago as they were much slimmer in their photos to the point where I could not recognize the face initially. She chalked it up to gaining weight due to the increased portion size in Western food whilst working here compared to Japanese portion sizes. Meh, could be the case, who knows. Service was still great but it has made me really skeptical about the photos from these agencies, even if they have "100% real photos".
In my experience, the Japanese providers usually have the most accurate photos and are the only ones that I've gone "wow, they look even better than the photos". Korean photos are almost 99% a completely different person. And Chinese providers are 50/50 and even the real ones have what you mentioned as "real photos with minor edits", although big YMMV on the "minor" part. Some websites do have a "100% real photos/accurate/selfie" on the ad to give you an idea if the photo is at all accurate or if you're going to be opening up a box of chocolates.
Just today actually, I saw a Japanese lady whose pictures, despite saying "100% real photos" (which they technically were) were clearly from a while ago as they were much slimmer in their photos to the point where I could not recognize the face initially. She chalked it up to gaining weight due to the increased portion size in Western food whilst working here compared to Japanese portion sizes. Meh, could be the case, who knows. Service was still great but it has made me really skeptical about the photos from these agencies, even if they have "100% real photos".
You can't make this claim and provide heavily doctored pics such as this. Having photos that "resemble" the provider is definition of bait-and-switch.
I don't know why more shops don't adopt the model AF/Temporary GF and all reputable independent providers use. Let the provider choose what level of protection they choose (blurred face, tattoos removed etc.) but otherwise have have accurate photos. What you see is what you get. It is simple, honest, and will promote trust in your business.
Furthermore, referring to potential customers who wish for accurate photos "haters' is gaslighting. Let's be real -- just because everyone else is doing something doesn't make that thing honest. Photo editing done this way is only going to be use to make a person look more attractive, never the opposite so it can't be trusted. I am not assuming you have bad intent, but you do appear to be using "safety and discretion" to justify the misrepresentation of of the Sp's appearance.
You don't need to be like the other shops with corny photos. You can respect your customers and protect the privacy of the sp's with accurate photos. It is done all the time. You used to have real pics. It was rad.
Last edited:
I've pretty much self-blacklisted from over half the local shops for turning and walking so many times then being honest when the handler texts back to question my action only to go on to justify the B&S by suggesting there was no edits or that I should have known what to expect based on the price point
It's fine. I'm older and less inclined to indulge as frequently as I did 10 years ago when so many shops were so much more honorable
Now I just put what was once my once or twice a month funds aside and splurge on a few incredibly well-reviewed gems each year and spare myself the nonsense and drama
For those encouraging shops to abandon the B&S BS to improve their reputations with their loyal customers, I say, 'Don't hold your breath'. They believe they make way more off the random pooners showing up and taking what's given than they do from discerning loyal repeaters they may lose
Sad truth is they couldn't give 2 shits about those who never return. Simply read the 'News Flash' tone of this agency's chosen public response to a community member to see the kind of regard they have for us
It's fine. I'm older and less inclined to indulge as frequently as I did 10 years ago when so many shops were so much more honorable
Now I just put what was once my once or twice a month funds aside and splurge on a few incredibly well-reviewed gems each year and spare myself the nonsense and drama
For those encouraging shops to abandon the B&S BS to improve their reputations with their loyal customers, I say, 'Don't hold your breath'. They believe they make way more off the random pooners showing up and taking what's given than they do from discerning loyal repeaters they may lose
Sad truth is they couldn't give 2 shits about those who never return. Simply read the 'News Flash' tone of this agency's chosen public response to a community member to see the kind of regard they have for us
Last edited:
