Cover up of Bidens mental state for 4 years
Hunter's Laptop is Russian disinformation
Ivermectin is horse paste
I will NOT pardon my son
Bloodbath (out of context)
I will be a dictator from day one (out of context and misquote)
Trump is trying to duplicate the Nazi rally at MSG
Good people on both sides. (out of context)
Covid came from a wet market
The FBI was not acting in consort with Twitter to censor Conservatives
Ukraine is winning the war!
Want more?
I would say these are far more consequential lies than the supposed ones you have provided.
So,
1) In your rush to defend the Diaper Don and 'both sides' this thing you've lost context that Orange Foolius is documented to have lied habitually and that he should not be believed when he says he did not assault E. Jean Caroll. By both sidesing you're proving my point. He is 'technically not a rapist' and is a sexual assaulter.
2) Your quoting all sources as if Biden made the lies personally. Were I to include the right wing nut-job media you source, i'd have to just put a live stream up here to capture all their bs. That would be the equivelent of asking people to defend media statements.
3) The guy who said HBiden gave money to the big guy just plead guilty to lying to the FBI about it. So the Cons just tried to destroy a private citizen to get at poppa - I though this was something you gun nut pro convoy freaks were worried about.
4) Out of the things you listed, only Biden pardoning his son is a provable 'lie', but again you hold your opponents to a different standard than you expect of your chosen one. I personally believe the pardon system in the states needs overhaul and is being abused - Roger Stone, Paul Manifort and Guilliani should be rotting in jail for espionage among others.
3) How many other of your pet theories didnt pan out? QAnon ring a bell?
4) I would not agree they are more consequential unless I was a partisan hack. Even Biden pardoning his son has less consequence than the pardons the Golden Umpa Loompa gave out to folks who lied to congress and the FBI for him.
5) Im noticing a trend with you where you take the very slightest whiff of something and then run with it as if true. Invermectin is horse paste when the efficacy of treatment is reviewed under a high standard scientific scrutiny.
At least dig deeper into your sources before using them as evidence , otherwise you're just another rube propogandist. Read the articles, look for counter arguments, have at least some room for controversy beyond 'my favourite talking head said it so it must be true'