What is your ideal appointment length when seeing a provider?
- Thread starter vitaminD
- Start date
I’m a long session guy, so 2 hours is my minimum. Longer if it’s a repeat with a girl I really like. I like the chat, flirting and foreplay before the clothes come off, and the relaxation and pillow talk between rounds. I’m still lucky enough to get in 2 or 3 rounds so I’m gonna take advantage of that while it lasts. Eventually my age will catch up to me and I’ll be done after one, but while I can ...
I'm a 1 hour guy because I find that strikes a good balance between giving enough time to enjoy the company of and connecting with the SP, and my pocketbook. It's my dream to do an overnight one day so I can really get into the fantasy and take that time with her to places I just haven't had a chance to yet.
One hour is the perfect amount of time for me. A little bit of chatting, some foreplay and oral, fuck until I cum...then repeat one more time (and maybe a quick BJ before I go).
I could do 90 minutes or two hours, but I'd be shooting blanks by that point.
I could do 90 minutes or two hours, but I'd be shooting blanks by that point.
Usually 60. But 90 is gaining traction for me, especially if already built in chemistry. Some price points the 45-60 minutes isn't bad..but some you can tell they prefer the 45 as a extra $100-$150 for 15 minutes generally means they want a break and are encouraging bookings towards the 45 minute booking. I'll take that into consideration as it's priced like that for a reason. If msog is included for a dif price point, I'll weigh that option aswell if it works out better then just 60 plus $xx for msog.
The shortest i have done is 15/quickie and longest is 8hrs. The quickie was with a lady that was known to have good head game but wasn't the best looking and also in a messy house. I did it because I wanted to experience her bj skills but I wasn't really satisfied with the session. Also experienced 30 and 45mins appointment before and never really liked those. I like doing atleast 2 rounds and I can't enjoy in a rushed session. Right now I won't do anything shorter than 60 but ideally I have chosen 90mins or 2hrs with most ladies I have met. The extended sessions 3-4hrs or even more are reserved for just few ladies that I have had the best times with before.
Two hours is perfect -- lots of time for a good warmup, a flirty chat, plenty of kissing, then a couple of orgasms, followed by more chatting, touching, and maybe more orgasms ... or maybe not. Never rushed, nice and slow, and time just melts away. Perfect.
An hour is usually standard for me, but I go longer if I'm seeing someone that I've got good chemistry with.
An hour for first meeting.
After that, more.
Not everyone clicks with everyone else. You can both be on your best day but there’s no spark. Nobody’s fault, you both move on.
After that, more.
Not everyone clicks with everyone else. You can both be on your best day but there’s no spark. Nobody’s fault, you both move on.
Last edited:
Definitely the longer the better. I generally like to start with 2 hours incase we don't have chemistry. That way I can leave early and not feel too bad about it. For repeat sessions I like 3 hours minimum.
It's intriguing that, as I write this comment, 72.8% of men who voted prefer appointments of 60 minutes or less. However, the trend observed on platforms like Tryst and among independent providers appears to be shifting toward a minimum of 60 to 90 minutes, and in some cases, even longer.
One might assume that this indicates a significant untapped market for providers who begin offering appointment lengths of 30 or 45 minutes as well.
One might assume that this indicates a significant untapped market for providers who begin offering appointment lengths of 30 or 45 minutes as well.
It's intriguing that, as I write this comment, 77.5% of men who voted prefer appointments of 60 minutes or more. And, the trend observed on platforms like Tryst and among independent providers appears to be shifting toward a minimum of 60 to 90 minutes, and in some cases, even longer.
One might assume that providers know their market!
And some people should learn that statistics are easily misrepresented!
The extended appointment lengths appear to be counterintuitive. It seems that those who can afford longer sessions often lack the spare time to utilize them. Many times, I find that I only have enough free time for a 30-minute appointment. 60 minutes max.
or the opposite
Of course, statistics can be misrepresented, particularly when dealing with a small sample size like this.
However, I believe we don't even need statistics or polls to conclude that appointment times of 60 minutes or less are probably the most preferred by buyers by a substantial margin. its just common sense really.
The Costco model of higher revenue with fixed transactional cost.
One bottle of Frank's Hot Sauce requires x many hours of shelf stocking and cashier time. Bundle two bottles together and you get almost twice the revenue for the same labour cost.
Two one hour appointments require two sessions of housekeeping, laundry and makeup prep, which can take an hour. So four hours work in total.
One two hour session is the same one hour of prep time.
Three hours work for two hours of income
vs
Four hours of work for two hours of income.
Longer sessions definitely benefit the provider. Added bonus: they usually involve familiar and reliable customers who book with less effort, ie one or two texts vs multiple queries and clarifications.
If that were the business model they were using, we would observe a decrease in rates.
Additionally, Costco is a large corporation that sometimes operates at a loss or breaks even on certain products because the profit margins on other items are quite favorable.
I can't believe you're actually comparing women to hot sauce, but it's not hard to deduce that the profit margins on hot sauce in bulk are much more favourable.
You're also presuming that requests and bookings for longer appointments are equal to those for shorter ones, and we know that's simply not the case.
This comment is entirely unfounded and lacks any supporting evidence, it comes across as nothing more than self-righteous self-congratulation.
From what I've gathered through conversations with some providers about their "business models," as well as insights from "provider-only" group chats, the reality is that those who offer appointment lengths ranging from 30 minutes and up tend to make the most money, provided there's enough demand and they can see that many clients without burning out.
Furthermore, given the high cost of rent and other expenses these days, many providers find they need to share their incall locations with others, which are usually booked by the hour. As a result, 30-minute bookings are often less practical.
I won't go into much more detail, as I believe many other commenters have already addressed the key points.
However, I would like to add that from my exposure to discussions among providers in various "providers-only group chats," I've learned that a significant number of those charging $500 or more per hour are only booking 1 to 4 clients each month.
It's not that they prefer to see such a limited number of clients each month; rather, it's simply that very few men are willing to book them. Before anyone gets defensive, I want to clarify that I'm not suggesting this applies to all providers in those price ranges, but it definitely describes the majority.
It really depends on so many things, for me. There are ladies I've been happy with 15 minute quickies fairly regularly, and there are those that 60 or 90s are great for. Often, 60 seems like too much time for one shot, and not enough for two. 30 often feels somewhat rushed. 45 seems like it would be kind of ideal, but yet, I almost never do them, lol.
