Just came across some names and people mentioned that there was a list of SP's and MP's that were under a dnr. Is there a list to Find out who exactly is on that list to prevent an accidental review?
Do not review list.
- Thread starter Masseffect189
- Start date
- Status
You should ALWAYS ask a provider if it’s okay to review her or not. Many of my reviewers will let me read over the reviews before they post them to make sure there isn’t anything that makes me uncomfortable.
I can understand and appreciate this, but then this defeats the purpose of a review website. I would feel violated if someone wrote a terrible or too personal review of me, so I do empathize with these ladies. But, if a women''s services are abysmal, then others need to find out somehow. I do ask before posting a positive review, but I feel it's my duty to advise others of scams etc.
Correct me if I'm wrong, mods, but I think reporting scams supersedes DNR status.
Well yes obviously scams or lack of service should be reported. It’s not like a scammer is going to make off with your money and say “Oh by the way, please don’t review me on PERB, k byee”.
I think you’re missing the point of the DNR women. The ones I know offer a great time but they don’t want bozos like us writing about them on the internet, especially in ways they can’t control.
I think you’re missing the point of the DNR women. The ones I know offer a great time but they don’t want bozos like us writing about them on the internet, especially in ways they can’t control.
The DNR list is very short and very private, only ladies approved by Fred Zed are on it. Ladies can and have been removed if it’s determined they were using it to hide bad service. If you do review a lady on the list it will be removed and an explanation sent to you.
If a provider has a DNR policy that’s between you and her we don’t enforce it.
We have to deal with scammers using the most frivolous reasons to have posts deleted daily, as long as a review follows board guidelines it will not be deleted.
Asking a lady if she wants to be reviewed is just asinine. I don't give a rat's ass what she thinks of perb or review sites in general. Not my problem. Going 1 step further the idiocy ladder is allowing the lady to "review" the review before being "allowed" to post it. This just reeks of bias and tampering with an honest review.
Good to know perb doesn't allow many ladies to be DNR as it kinda defeats the purpose of this place.
Good to know perb doesn't allow many ladies to be DNR as it kinda defeats the purpose of this place.
Review boards surely must be a man's idea and creation. I personally request to be DNR (recommendations welcomed), as I don't need to have myself or services validated to be bad, mediocre or fabulous. Furthermore, what I do behind closed doors with someone else, ain't nobody else's business and the braggadocious, play by play reviews are filthy and disturbing. Not giving a rat's ass just shows your lack of respect for others.
For better or for worse, the DNR list is a function of Perb being a business, not of it being a public forum (hint: it's not a public forum).
Asking her if she would mind being reviewed is cordial, but doesn't have anything to do with a DNR list. A business having a say on their review really defeats the purpose of said review. SW reviews are of a different nature, but it comes with the line of work and just isn't something a SW can control (short of becoming a Perb advertiser, but even then it's limited).
Asking her if she would mind being reviewed is cordial, but doesn't have anything to do with a DNR list. A business having a say on their review really defeats the purpose of said review. SW reviews are of a different nature, but it comes with the line of work and just isn't something a SW can control (short of becoming a Perb advertiser, but even then it's limited).
That's not a fair statement to make and u know it. If u genuinely felt that way then it's like me saying u have something to hide coz you're DNR. Neither is completely true. The reality falls somewhere in between.
I feel even that is excessive. If she doesn't want reviews, the ad should mention it. That's easy to go along with: either don't see her, or don't review.
If a review is actually shown to the SP before posting, it might as well come with a disclaimer: "this message was approved by ...".
I think maybe you misunderstood. I would never ask a client to amend a negative part of an experience with me; however I find super graphic reviews to be tasteless and a bit of a breach of privacy. I don’t appreciate that kind of review. Also, I think you’d be shocked how many clients are vengeful and write fake reviews or put outright lies in their reviews.
I can't speak for fake negative reviews as that is obviously just plain wrong. It is however, a cost of doing business sometimes whether we like it or not. I know bcoz I run one myself. Reviews are a tool and u take the bad with the good however unfortunate it may be.
I'm hopeful DNR ladies don't coerce clients into leaving only positive reviews but it does irk me to think of a business critiquing a review before "allowing" it to be posted.
I'm hopeful DNR ladies don't coerce clients into leaving only positive reviews but it does irk me to think of a business critiquing a review before "allowing" it to be posted.
Exactly. Kinda like YouTube reviewers disclosing that the product being reviewed was provided by such and such.
Excuse you, but I feel it is a fair statement and you not agreeing with me is up to you. All of my ads and PERB profile kindly ask that one respects my privacy to not review me. I know what I provide and so does that
person who shared time with me. There is no need to turn around and tell others what we did, or how I look. I fulfill my job requirements to the utmost and update my ads with how I look and my rates dictate the type
or service one will receive. One may absolutely recommend myself and my services, but what happens with Miss Lady Vanessa, stays with you and her.
And a side note, I have nothing but good reviews.
I would agree that it would be weird to be DNR or ask to go over reviews if the service wasn’t so personal. If reviews were just “I had an amazing time with x! She is fantastic!” I’m sure fewer providers would be DNR. They’re not, though. Many go into graphic and exaggerated detail which I can definitely understand would make people uncomfortable. Also, a provider may feel comfortable doing something with one person and not another—I’ve asked reviewers to leave out certain things I’ve done with them that I don’t want everyone thinking is a guaranteed part of my service. Anyways, yeah, there are lots of legitimate reasons not to want reviews or to want to green light a review. And yeah, I will die on this hill.
This made me laugh. It's nice to be so green to how the world works.
Oh yeah also “the cost of doing business” doesn’t really apply to a profession that is already super stigmatised. A bad review could literally mean the difference between eating or not eating for some of us. If this was all above board there would be no need for a specialty review site just for sex workers; we’d all be on Yelp right now 😂 write to your MP and fight for decrim!
If someone is advertising services, asking to be on a DNR list (or to just not be reviewed, regardless of the list) is asking for something that is unrealistic. I would never speak about an experience I've had with a civilian through friends or at a coffee shop and started dating but that's because she didn't put herself into a public domain of commerce. Providers do. If they were low key, under the radar and not advertising on this or any forum, or not advertising period, then I can agree with the idea of DNR, but for anyone that is openly advertising AND making marketing claims about how wonderful they are to be with, you're fair game as long as the reviews are tasteful. I find the idea of advertisers to request DNR to be selfish and incredibly self serving.
- Status
