Dee 2088
- Thread starter LuigiVentura
- Start date
There seems ti be existing reviews that date back to 2019. Maybe things are different now. If you do TOFTT, please let the perb universe know how the session went.
https://perb.cc/xenforo/threads/dee.265214/#post-2017628
OK, so I TOFTT here today.
I haven't posted a review for a few years, so I'm a bit rusty. She reminds me to some degree of Tara. Though not nearly so bad. Those of you who may have read my review for Tara a while back will start to get a sinking feeling at the mention of that particular horror. Unlikely any of you remember it, but I do. Oh the humanity.
So, Dee. Advertized on Leo with a veritable smorgasboard of services. The good news is that she is very friendly and easy to chat to and seems to routinely work out of a small "spa" on Main which was clean, tidy and quiet. And so, on to the bad and the ugly.
While not unattactive facially, I feel somewhat cheated by the photos she chooses to use on Leo which are sadly not her. Not even close. If she wasn't so misrepresentative, I probably would have let it fly without a review, but $$ is a fair bit to plop down if the goods don't even come close to matching the pricetag or the promise. The ad on leo (though not all of them) shows a nice plump breast pic, which is inviting, arousing and also a complete misrepresentation. So is the other one of a very taut, trim, athletic figure with a nicey rounded bum in leggings. She may have the dog shown in the picture, but she sure doesn't have the body. She advertizes as being 46. I am nearly fifty and felt positively juvenile next to her. I would put her closer to 60, if not a bit above. Her tits are very saggy, although she does have quite nice nipples. The skin on her belly, unlike the tight and firm one in the pic, is flaccid and has those weird vertical belly-jowls some women get. She also has some scars, but that's OK. She is not fat, but generally, her skin is loose and sort of shifts independently of the bone and muscle underneath. Her teeth are fine and facially, she's quite acceptable, but no Aphrodite. She smelled fine and was clean. Her pussy, while being actually quite nice to look at, is very hairy, with plenty of grey. This fact did not unduly concern me, but did lend credence to my doubts about her claimed age. Still nobody goes to a mature SP thinking that they have definitely been honest on that score.
On to the menu and delivery:
She remained puzzlingly fully clothed while commencing proceedings with one of the least effectual and enthusiastic massages I have ever had. I think I could have had a better one from a quadruple amputee. In a blindfold. Frankly, it seemed, in hindsight to be a measure to take up time rather than set any erotic tone. Her hands did very little exploration to build up the sexual tension, merely slapped on some oil and rubbed it a bit. She was very reluctant to undress. She said I had to ask her permission to touch her - something I though was a bit of a given (to a point) in this sort of business relationship where you had agreed you were going to fuck. This was said as I reached over to gently unbutton her top. This initiative on my part revealed the above mentioned below-par breasts and belly, which may explain her reluctance to undrape.
She was very complimentary about my physique, stating I was in much better order than her usual clientele - more about this shortly. After rubbing the massage oil back off me with a towel (again, it felt like a time-waste), she then agreed to perform rimming. She seems to really like rimming, and is quite adept at it, preferring to also simultaneously give one's trouser snake a vigorous handshake (although in my case not quite vigorous enough to make him spew). She talks about it like she is the only person performing this most benevolent of services. Once again, time was wasted as she wanted to describe her technique to me. I wasn't having any of it, just telling her to go at it and if it felt good then it didn't matter what the technique was. She seemed surpised I had been rimmed before - which I in turn found surprising. Nevertheless, she got down to it and was actually pretty damn good at it. She used a dam of what looked like saran wrap. Still felt good though.
Despite it being both heavily featured on her ad and agreed to on my call to her, she very quickly declined anal. So here we come back to my physique. She declined anal saying my cock was much, much too big and how very very thick I was. Now fellas, I'm happy to have my ego stroked as much as my cock, but I'm here to tell you that my cock, while perfectly agreeable to most, is no anaconda. It's average, or perhaps even a little teensy bit smaller than average, so what fella she is hoping to entertain in the dubious delights of her pooper, I can't imagine. Now, bearing in mind I am not particularly well endowed, I decided to satisfy my penetrative urge with vaginal instead, which again, is in the ad and was agreed on the call. She reluctantly disrobed her lower half and told me how it would have to be done (if she could at all), with me being possessed of such a mammoth member as I apparently am. She beseeched me to be slow and gentle as if I was popping her cherry. Upon entry, she nearly screamed, and I barely, at that point even had half my helmet inside her. She allowed another inch or so and that was all she could suffer to manage. I like to have nice long thrusts of what meagre meat I have, so a very shallow drive just doesn't do much for me, so off came the condom after probably less than a minute. Then it was on to the main event. I may have mentioned this in the past, but I am rather fond of golden showers. Dee bravely wasted time throughout our session to stop and take water breaks which I presumed were to help build up a reservoir like deluge to be delivered upon my good self when the time came. Well, it arrived and I prepped myself into position.......
The room had a very small quadrant shaped shower stall which was OK, but not ideal for this sort of activity. She was unable to pee on me while playing with my nipples, which is what I particularly like and which always makes me shoot. Therefore orgasm was not reached. Despite spending so much time drinking, she produced more of a dribble than a deluge so it was all over much too quickly. Lots of buildup and no delivery. Her aim was a bit off too as she struggled too much to be able to squat and manage the flow. Like I said above, she is not the 46 she claims to be. She apparently had an accident some years ago that impacted the legs and, she claims, her pussy, which was why she couldn't accommodate the magnificence of my enormous cock. Anyway, as she had made it clear earlier that she did not care for a spot of pre or post-urinary cunnilingus, I was left feeling a bit deficient of an orgasm - to the tune of one, in fact. I persuaded her to suck and play with my nipples while I wanked and that got me off in the end. As I was wanking, she was wary of my cum splashing her shoes and moved them out of what she expected to be the trajectory of my jizz. I did not feel particularly bad however, that my first (and unobserved) spurt smacked right into the join of her pants and top - yes, she took the time to dress while I waited! Anyway, it was a very handsomely sized spurt, if I do say so myself.
Service:
Dee is pleasant and chatty. BUT, I have never, ever, been with a SP that was so bad a clock-watcher. When she started rimming, she said "I will do it for 10-12 minutes. With 5 minutes of that to go, she popped her head up and told me just that. When into the last minute of her rectum footling, she did the same. Quite off-putting if you are (as I was) trying to work up to that being the first shot on target. It went unrewarded. To be blunt, I just felt time was wasted unnnecessarily, constantly commented on and it was very detrimental to my session. Whatever activity I suggested towards the end to bring about my orgasm was met with something along the lines of either declining it altogether or "it will have to be quick as we only have 10* minutes" * or seven, or five, or three, or two or one. She is the worst I have ever come across for that bar none.
I did not get a BJ as it was to be covered, which I dislike and it would have wasted more time again as she rummaged for a condom. She insisted I wear a XL Trojan due to my mighty girth and it took a while to find the one to fuck her with, let alone another for a blowjob. Indeed, so apparently impressive was my penis that I am surprised she didn't try and glue two together to ensure proper coverage of my unbelievably huge cock (by the way, rather flatteringly, this is the first time ANYONE has said my cock is too big - or even big at all really).
Conclusion:
Dee is a nice person, she really is. But I feel perhaps I am not the demographic she typically sees. I am less than 50, virile, up for all sorts of fun and games and, despite her advertised menu, it is abundantly clear that she is not. She explicitly told me not to touch her pussy for example. Now I am not a sex pest like Trump, but I do like to play about with lady-parts from time to time. I'm afraind it's off limits here, as was DATO (on her), DATY (strongly discouraged), FS (unless you have a cock as wide as a bootlace), Anal (I suspect for all but the most microscopic of penises) and kissing of any kind.
Cost for an "All inclusive FULL MEAL DEAL" hour was $$. I gave a pre-meeting tip of .2, which I somewhat feel was not really earned.
Would I repeat? Nope.
Would I recommend? Nope - not unless you are an older gent who is looking for a slightly less vigorous suite of activities, or if you are not interested in actually fucking, being blown or getting your face deep into a pussy.
Final thoughts:
I do feel kinda bad posting a negative review, but I disliked the misrepresentation, but I kinda get that her business would be negatively impacted if she put honest body pics up. Not an excuse though, she shouldn't do it. If worried she would lose business, I get that, but better to put up no photos than fake ones and trick your clients.
Anyway, happy pooning chums, just try doing it with someone other than Dee.
I haven't posted a review for a few years, so I'm a bit rusty. She reminds me to some degree of Tara. Though not nearly so bad. Those of you who may have read my review for Tara a while back will start to get a sinking feeling at the mention of that particular horror. Unlikely any of you remember it, but I do. Oh the humanity.
So, Dee. Advertized on Leo with a veritable smorgasboard of services. The good news is that she is very friendly and easy to chat to and seems to routinely work out of a small "spa" on Main which was clean, tidy and quiet. And so, on to the bad and the ugly.
While not unattactive facially, I feel somewhat cheated by the photos she chooses to use on Leo which are sadly not her. Not even close. If she wasn't so misrepresentative, I probably would have let it fly without a review, but $$ is a fair bit to plop down if the goods don't even come close to matching the pricetag or the promise. The ad on leo (though not all of them) shows a nice plump breast pic, which is inviting, arousing and also a complete misrepresentation. So is the other one of a very taut, trim, athletic figure with a nicey rounded bum in leggings. She may have the dog shown in the picture, but she sure doesn't have the body. She advertizes as being 46. I am nearly fifty and felt positively juvenile next to her. I would put her closer to 60, if not a bit above. Her tits are very saggy, although she does have quite nice nipples. The skin on her belly, unlike the tight and firm one in the pic, is flaccid and has those weird vertical belly-jowls some women get. She also has some scars, but that's OK. She is not fat, but generally, her skin is loose and sort of shifts independently of the bone and muscle underneath. Her teeth are fine and facially, she's quite acceptable, but no Aphrodite. She smelled fine and was clean. Her pussy, while being actually quite nice to look at, is very hairy, with plenty of grey. This fact did not unduly concern me, but did lend credence to my doubts about her claimed age. Still nobody goes to a mature SP thinking that they have definitely been honest on that score.
On to the menu and delivery:
She remained puzzlingly fully clothed while commencing proceedings with one of the least effectual and enthusiastic massages I have ever had. I think I could have had a better one from a quadruple amputee. In a blindfold. Frankly, it seemed, in hindsight to be a measure to take up time rather than set any erotic tone. Her hands did very little exploration to build up the sexual tension, merely slapped on some oil and rubbed it a bit. She was very reluctant to undress. She said I had to ask her permission to touch her - something I though was a bit of a given (to a point) in this sort of business relationship where you had agreed you were going to fuck. This was said as I reached over to gently unbutton her top. This initiative on my part revealed the above mentioned below-par breasts and belly, which may explain her reluctance to undrape.
She was very complimentary about my physique, stating I was in much better order than her usual clientele - more about this shortly. After rubbing the massage oil back off me with a towel (again, it felt like a time-waste), she then agreed to perform rimming. She seems to really like rimming, and is quite adept at it, preferring to also simultaneously give one's trouser snake a vigorous handshake (although in my case not quite vigorous enough to make him spew). She talks about it like she is the only person performing this most benevolent of services. Once again, time was wasted as she wanted to describe her technique to me. I wasn't having any of it, just telling her to go at it and if it felt good then it didn't matter what the technique was. She seemed surpised I had been rimmed before - which I in turn found surprising. Nevertheless, she got down to it and was actually pretty damn good at it. She used a dam of what looked like saran wrap. Still felt good though.
Despite it being both heavily featured on her ad and agreed to on my call to her, she very quickly declined anal. So here we come back to my physique. She declined anal saying my cock was much, much too big and how very very thick I was. Now fellas, I'm happy to have my ego stroked as much as my cock, but I'm here to tell you that my cock, while perfectly agreeable to most, is no anaconda. It's average, or perhaps even a little teensy bit smaller than average, so what fella she is hoping to entertain in the dubious delights of her pooper, I can't imagine. Now, bearing in mind I am not particularly well endowed, I decided to satisfy my penetrative urge with vaginal instead, which again, is in the ad and was agreed on the call. She reluctantly disrobed her lower half and told me how it would have to be done (if she could at all), with me being possessed of such a mammoth member as I apparently am. She beseeched me to be slow and gentle as if I was popping her cherry. Upon entry, she nearly screamed, and I barely, at that point even had half my helmet inside her. She allowed another inch or so and that was all she could suffer to manage. I like to have nice long thrusts of what meagre meat I have, so a very shallow drive just doesn't do much for me, so off came the condom after probably less than a minute. Then it was on to the main event. I may have mentioned this in the past, but I am rather fond of golden showers. Dee bravely wasted time throughout our session to stop and take water breaks which I presumed were to help build up a reservoir like deluge to be delivered upon my good self when the time came. Well, it arrived and I prepped myself into position.......
The room had a very small quadrant shaped shower stall which was OK, but not ideal for this sort of activity. She was unable to pee on me while playing with my nipples, which is what I particularly like and which always makes me shoot. Therefore orgasm was not reached. Despite spending so much time drinking, she produced more of a dribble than a deluge so it was all over much too quickly. Lots of buildup and no delivery. Her aim was a bit off too as she struggled too much to be able to squat and manage the flow. Like I said above, she is not the 46 she claims to be. She apparently had an accident some years ago that impacted the legs and, she claims, her pussy, which was why she couldn't accommodate the magnificence of my enormous cock. Anyway, as she had made it clear earlier that she did not care for a spot of pre or post-urinary cunnilingus, I was left feeling a bit deficient of an orgasm - to the tune of one, in fact. I persuaded her to suck and play with my nipples while I wanked and that got me off in the end. As I was wanking, she was wary of my cum splashing her shoes and moved them out of what she expected to be the trajectory of my jizz. I did not feel particularly bad however, that my first (and unobserved) spurt smacked right into the join of her pants and top - yes, she took the time to dress while I waited! Anyway, it was a very handsomely sized spurt, if I do say so myself.
Service:
Dee is pleasant and chatty. BUT, I have never, ever, been with a SP that was so bad a clock-watcher. When she started rimming, she said "I will do it for 10-12 minutes. With 5 minutes of that to go, she popped her head up and told me just that. When into the last minute of her rectum footling, she did the same. Quite off-putting if you are (as I was) trying to work up to that being the first shot on target. It went unrewarded. To be blunt, I just felt time was wasted unnnecessarily, constantly commented on and it was very detrimental to my session. Whatever activity I suggested towards the end to bring about my orgasm was met with something along the lines of either declining it altogether or "it will have to be quick as we only have 10* minutes" * or seven, or five, or three, or two or one. She is the worst I have ever come across for that bar none.
I did not get a BJ as it was to be covered, which I dislike and it would have wasted more time again as she rummaged for a condom. She insisted I wear a XL Trojan due to my mighty girth and it took a while to find the one to fuck her with, let alone another for a blowjob. Indeed, so apparently impressive was my penis that I am surprised she didn't try and glue two together to ensure proper coverage of my unbelievably huge cock (by the way, rather flatteringly, this is the first time ANYONE has said my cock is too big - or even big at all really).
Conclusion:
Dee is a nice person, she really is. But I feel perhaps I am not the demographic she typically sees. I am less than 50, virile, up for all sorts of fun and games and, despite her advertised menu, it is abundantly clear that she is not. She explicitly told me not to touch her pussy for example. Now I am not a sex pest like Trump, but I do like to play about with lady-parts from time to time. I'm afraind it's off limits here, as was DATO (on her), DATY (strongly discouraged), FS (unless you have a cock as wide as a bootlace), Anal (I suspect for all but the most microscopic of penises) and kissing of any kind.
Cost for an "All inclusive FULL MEAL DEAL" hour was $$. I gave a pre-meeting tip of .2, which I somewhat feel was not really earned.
Would I repeat? Nope.
Would I recommend? Nope - not unless you are an older gent who is looking for a slightly less vigorous suite of activities, or if you are not interested in actually fucking, being blown or getting your face deep into a pussy.
Final thoughts:
I do feel kinda bad posting a negative review, but I disliked the misrepresentation, but I kinda get that her business would be negatively impacted if she put honest body pics up. Not an excuse though, she shouldn't do it. If worried she would lose business, I get that, but better to put up no photos than fake ones and trick your clients.
Anyway, happy pooning chums, just try doing it with someone other than Dee.
Last edited:
